Literature DB >> 25540152

Population properties affect inbreeding avoidance in moose.

Ivar Herfindal1, Hallvard Haanes2, Knut H Røed3, Erling J Solberg4, Stine S Markussen5, Morten Heim6, Bernt-Erik Sæther5.   

Abstract

Mechanisms reducing inbreeding are thought to have evolved owing to fitness costs of breeding with close relatives. In small and isolated populations, or populations with skewed age- or sex distributions, mate choice becomes limited, and inbreeding avoidance mechanisms ineffective. We used a unique individual-based dataset on moose from a small island in Norway to assess whether inbreeding avoidance was related to population structure and size, expecting inbreeding avoidance to be greater in years with larger populations and even adult sex ratios. The probability that a potential mating event was realized was negatively related to the inbreeding coefficient of the potential offspring, with a stronger relationship in years with a higher proportion or number of males in the population. Thus, adult sex ratio and population size affect the degree of inbreeding avoidance. Consequently, conservation managers should aim for sex ratios that facilitate inbreeding avoidance, especially in small and isolated populations.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alces alces; adult sex ratio; population size

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540152      PMCID: PMC4298189          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation.

Authors:  Dieter Ebert; Christoph Haag; Mark Kirkpatrick; Myriam Riek; Jurgen W Hottinger; V Ilmari Pajunen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  When not to avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Indrek Ots
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Multiple Allee effects and population management.

Authors:  Ludek Berec; Elena Angulo; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  How do reproductive skew and founder group size affect genetic diversity in reintroduced populations?

Authors:  K A Miller; N J Nelson; H G Smith; J A Moore
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?

Authors:  Marta Szulkin; Katie V Stopher; Josephine M Pemberton; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Inbreeding depression in the wild.

Authors:  P Crnokrak; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The effects of habitat fragmentation on the social kin structure and mating system of the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis.

Authors:  S C Banks; S J Ward; D B Lindenmayer; G R Finlayson; S J Lawson; A C Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Time-lag in extinction dynamics in experimental populations: evidence for a genetic Allee effect?

Authors:  Elodie Vercken; Flora Vincent; Ludovic Mailleret; Nicolas Ris; Elisabeth Tabone; Xavier Fauvergue
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Effects of inbreeding on fitness-related traits in a small isolated moose population.

Authors:  Hallvard Haanes; Stine S Markussen; Ivar Herfindal; Knut H Røed; Erling J Solberg; Morten Heim; Liv Midthjell; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Fitness correlates of age at primiparity in a hunted moose population.

Authors:  Stine S Markussen; Anne Loison; Ivar Herfindal; Erling J Solberg; Hallvard Haanes; Knut H Røed; Morten Heim; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Resolving the conundrum of inbreeding depression but no inbreeding avoidance: Estimating sex-specific selection on inbreeding by song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Peter Arcese; Greta Bocedi; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Habitat-performance relationships of a large mammal on a predator-free island dominated by humans.

Authors:  Andrew M Allen; Augusta Dorey; Jonas Malmsten; Lars Edenius; Göran Ericsson; Navinder J Singh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Female dispersion and sex ratios interact in the evolution of mating behavior: a computational model.

Authors:  B V Gomes; D M Guimarães; D Szczupak; K Neves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.