Literature DB >> 24995997

Experimental manipulation of female reproduction demonstrates its fitness costs in kangaroos.

Uriel Gélin1, Michelle E Wilson2, Graeme Coulson2, Marco Festa-Bianchet1,2.   

Abstract

When resources are scarce, female mammals should face a trade-off between lactation and other life-history traits such as growth, survival and subsequent reproduction. Kangaroos are ideal to test predictions about reproductive costs because they may simultaneously lactate and carry a young, and have indeterminate growth and a long breeding season. An earlier study in three of our five study populations prevented female eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) from reproducing during one reproductive season by either inserting contraceptive implants or removing very small pouch young. We explored how individual and environmental variables affect the costs of reproduction over time, combining this experimental reduction of reproductive effort with multi-year monitoring of 270 marked females. Experimental manipulation should control for individual heterogeneity, revealing the costs of reproduction and their likely sources. We also examined the fitness consequences of reproductive effort and offspring sex among unmanipulated individuals to test whether sex allocation strategies affected trade-offs. Costs of reproduction included longer inter-birth intervals and lower probability of producing a young that survived to 7 months in the subsequent reproductive event. Weaning success, however, did not differ significantly between manipulated and control females. By reducing reproductive effort, manipulation appeared to increase individual condition and subsequent reproductive success. Effects of offspring sex upon subsequent reproductive success varied according to year and study population. Mothers of sons were generally more likely to have a young that survived to 7 months, compared to mothers of daughters. The fitness costs of reproduction arise from constraints in both acquisition and allocation of resources. To meet these costs, females delay subsequent parturition and may manipulate offspring sex. Reproductive tactics thus vary according to the amount of resource available to each individual, promoting a wide range in reproductive performance within and among individuals and populations.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Macropus giganteus; body condition; environmental effects; individual heterogeneity; mammal; marsupial; reproductive costs; reproductive rate; sex allocation; trade‐off

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995997     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  9 in total

1.  Tall young females get ahead: size-specific fecundity in wild kangaroos suggests a steep trade-off with growth.

Authors:  Louise Quesnel; Wendy J King; Graeme Coulson; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Alison Bell; Rudy Boonstra; Ben Dantzer; Sophia G Lavergne; Katie E McGhee; Kirsty J MacLeod; Laurane Winandy; Cedric Zimmer; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Trade-offs between reproduction and health in free-ranging African striped mice.

Authors:  I Schoepf; N Pillay; C Schradin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Fitness correlates of age at primiparity in a hunted moose population.

Authors:  Stine S Markussen; Anne Loison; Ivar Herfindal; Erling J Solberg; Hallvard Haanes; Knut H Røed; Morten Heim; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Adoption in eastern grey kangaroos: a consequence of misdirected care?

Authors:  Wendy J King; David M Forsyth; Graeme Coulson; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Finding the Balance: Fertility Control for the Management of Fragmented Populations of a Threatened Rock-Wallaby Species.

Authors:  Nicole Willers; Graeme B Martin; Phill Matson; Peter R Mawson; Keith Morris; Roberta Bencini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Individual quality and age but not environmental or social conditions modulate costs of reproduction in a capital breeder.

Authors:  Lucie Debeffe; Jocelyn Poissant; Philip D McLoughlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Experimentally increased brood size accelerates actuarial senescence and increases subsequent reproductive effort in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Jelle J Boonekamp; Christina Bauch; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Costs of Rearing the Wrong Sex: Cross-Fostering to Manipulate Offspring Sex in Tammar Wallabies.

Authors:  Lisa E Schwanz; Kylie A Robert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.