Literature DB >> 2288090

Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception.

G J Mitchison1, S P McKee.   

Abstract

There is a marked anisotropy in the perception of stereoscopic tilt: vertical gradients of horizontal disparity are more easily perceived than horizontal gradients. This could be explained if orientation disparity (the orientation difference in the two eyes' views of the same line) were one of the cues used to determine tilt, since orientation disparities are in general larger for vertical gradients. We show here that a marked anisotropy in tilt perception is present even with stereograms which contain equally strong orientation disparity cues for horizontal and vertical gradients. This implies that there must be other mechanisms for stereoscopic tilt perception, or further processing steps in the use of orientation disparity, which are anisotropic in their mode of action.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2288090     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90159-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences.

Authors:  H Bridge; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The monocular-boundary-contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression.

Authors:  Eric A van Bogaert; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The motion-induced contour revisited: Observations on 3-D structure and illusory contour formation in moving stimuli.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Mengzhu Fu; Michael D Dodd; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Douglas G Taylor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; William Herbert; Laura Villa-Laso; Michael Widdall; Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Binocular Depth Judgments on Smoothly Curved Surfaces.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hornsey; Paul B Hibbard; Peter Scarfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stereo slant discrimination of planar 3D surfaces: Frontoparallel versus planar matching.

Authors:  Can Oluk; Kathryn Bonnen; Johannes Burge; Lawrence K Cormack; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Robust natural depth for anticorrelated random dot stereogram for edge stimuli, but minimal reversed depth for embedded circular stimuli, irrespective of eccentricity.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Jordi M Asher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Evidence in Support of the Border-Ownership Neurons for Representing Textured Figures.

Authors:  Chao Han; Wanyi Huang; Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-07-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.