| Literature DB >> 29191238 |
Khawaja Shafique Ahmad1, Abdul Hamid2, Fahim Nawaz3, Mansoor Hameed4, Farooq Ahmad4, Jiabin Deng5, Noreen Akhtar6, Ambreen Wazarat7, Sehrish Mahroof7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This explorative study was undertaken for the first time in Kel village located in the Upper Neelum Valley, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. The purpose was to document the indigenous knowledge of the native people used in the preparation of herbal medicines.Entities:
Keywords: Ethnobotany; Informant consensus factor; Jaccard index; Neelum Valley; Use value; Western Himalaya
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29191238 PMCID: PMC5709976 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-017-0196-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Demographic information of the respondents
| Variables | Demographic categories | Total | Percentages (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 14 | 70 |
| Women | 6 | 30 | |
| Age groups | 30–45 | 4 | 20 |
| 46–60 | 6 | 30 | |
| 61–75 | 8 | 40 | |
| 76 and above | 2 | 10 | |
| Educational attainment | Illiterate | 8 | 40 |
| Primary | 4 | 20 | |
| Middle | 4 | 20 | |
| Secondary | 2 | 10 | |
| graduate | 2 | 10 | |
| Occupation | Housewives | 4 | 20 |
| Shopkeepers | 3 | 15 | |
| Farmers | 3 | 15 | |
| Labors | 2 | 10 | |
| Primary teachers | 2 | 10 | |
| Local healers | 6 | 30 |
Fig. 1Map of the studied area with locations within the upper part of District Neelum
Medicinal plants used in Kel, Neelum Valley, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
| Family | Plant species/voucher No. | Part(s) used | ∑Ui | UVs | FC | RFC | Ailments | Mode of administration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apiaeceae |
| Fruit | 16 | 0.8 | 8 | 0.4 | Digestive disorders | Extract, powder |
| Araliaceae |
| Leaves | 22 | 1.1 | 9 | 0.45 | Ulcer, dyspepsia, skin allergies | Decoction, juice |
| Asparagaceae |
| Root | 25 | 1.25 | 10 | 0.5 | Dysentery, diarrhea | Powder |
| Asteraceae |
| Leaves, fruit | 34 | 1.7 | 12 | 0.6 | Wound healing, digestion, earache, toothache, tuberculosis | Infusion, juice, eat |
|
| Whole plant | 35 | 1.75 | 11 | 0.55 | Leprosy, bone dislocation, fever | Infusion, juice, decoction | |
|
| Leaves | 35 | 1.75 | 8 | 0.4 | Hepatitis, jaundice, stomach disorders | Infusion | |
|
| Leaves and root | 33 | 1.65 | 8 | 0.4 | Liver pain, stomach disorder | Juice, extract | |
|
| Whole plant | 27 | 1.35 | 5 | 0.25 | Cancer, skin allergies | Extract | |
|
| Roots | 19 | 0.95 | 11 | 0.55 | Tonic, bone fracture | Extract | |
|
| Whole plant | 13 | 0.65 | 6 | 0.3 | Skin allergies, stomach pain, typhoid | Paste, decoction | |
|
| Whole plant | 29 | 1.45 | 6 | 0.3 | Jaundice, liver disorder, stomach pain | Poultice, juice | |
| Balsaminaceae |
| Leaves, aerial parts | 39 | 1.95 | 12 | 0.6 | Joint pain, anxiety | Paste, extract |
| Betulaceae |
| Bark | 9 | 0.45 | 10 | 0.5 | Jaundice, wound healing | Infusion, extract, poultice |
| Berberidaceae |
| Roots, leaves | 41 | 2.05 | 15 | 0.75 | Jaundice, diarrhea | Oil, juice, decoction |
|
| Whole plant | 15 | 0.75 | 10 | 0.5 | Cancer, jaundice, typhoid fever | Decoction, infusion | |
| Broginaceae |
| leaves and roots | 24 | 1.2 | 13 | 0.65 | Diaphoretic, diuretic, wound healer | Oil, extract, powder |
| Buxaceae |
| Leaves | 19 | 0.95 | 4 | 0.2 | Blood purifier | Extract, infusion |
| Caprifoliaceae |
| Leaves and fruits | 21 | 1.05 | 5 | 0.25 | Used for abortion and miscarriage | Powder |
| Chenopodiaceae |
| Whole plant | 17 | 0.85 | 3 | 0.15 | Rheumatism, dysentery | Infusion, poultice, juice |
| Dioscoreaceae |
| Leaves, stem, tuber | 23 | 1.15 | 7 | 0.35 | Rheumatism | Decoction, powder |
| Dryopteridaceae |
| Leaves and stem | 7 | 0.35 | 8 | 0.4 | Ulcer | Infusion, decoction |
|
| Whole plant | 11 | 0.55 | 2 | 0.1 | Tuberculosis | Decoction | |
| Euphorbiaceae |
| Leaves and seeds | 14 | 0.7 | 7 | 0.35 | Asthma, joint pain | Oil, poultice |
| Fabaceae |
| Leaves and seeds | 10 | 0.5 | 6 | 0.3 | Rheumatic pains | Paste, poultice |
|
| Bark | 9 | 0.45 | 8 | 0.4 | Hemorrhages, diarrhea and dysentery | Extract, decoction, infusion | |
|
| Bark and galls | 18 | 0.9 | 9 | 0.45 | Diarrhea, dysentery and throat pain | Decoction | |
| Fumariaceae |
| Whole plant | 12 | 0.6 | 7 | 0.35 | Skin allergies, jaundice | Decoction, powder |
| Gentianaceae |
| 12 | 0.6 | 11 | 0.55 | Stomach pain and liver disorders | Hot infusion, juice, extract | |
| Geraniaceae |
| Roots | 6 | 0.3 | 8 | 0.4 | Wound healing | Powder, extract |
| Hippocastanaceae |
| Seeds and fruit | 10 | 0.5 | 7 | 0.35 | Joint pain | Paste, oil |
| Juglandiaceae |
| Bark, leaves and seeds | 16 | 0.8 | 3 | 0.15 | Asthma, constipation and diarrhea | Decoction, juice |
| Lamiaceae |
| Whole plant | 18 | 0.9 | 3 | 0.15 | Abdominal pain | Paste, powder |
|
| 14 | 0.7 | 5 | 0.25 | Digestion | Extract | ||
|
| Whole plant | 19 | 0.95 | 9 | 0.45 | Skin diseases and diarrhea | Juice | |
|
| Whole plant | 12 | 0.6 | 9 | 0.45 | Heart diseases, cough and cold | Decoction | |
|
| leaves | 3 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.2 | Stomach pain and skin diseases | Powder, poultice | |
| Meliaceae |
| Leaves and bark | 10 | 0.5 | 6 | 0.3 | Fever, tonic | Paste, extract |
| Oleaceae |
| Leaves | 10 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.2 | Ulcer | Decoction |
| Plantaginaceae |
| Whole plant | 6 | 0.3 | 4 | 0.2 | Abdominal pain | Decoction, Powder, extract |
|
| Seeds | 13 | 0.65 | 7 | 0.35 | Stomach disorders | Powder, paste | |
| Polygonaceae |
| Roots | 13 | 0.65 | 8 | 0.4 | Tonic | Decoction, powder |
| Ranunculaceae |
| Roots | 7 | 0.35 | 5 | 0.25 | Fever, cough, stomach disorders | Decoction, extract, infusion |
| Rosaceace |
| Leaves and fruit | 5 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.2 | Anemia | Juice, infusion, oil |
|
| Whole plant | 5 | 0.25 | 9 | 0.45 | Dysentery, jaundice, wound healing | Powder, paste | |
| Rubiaceae |
| Whole plant | 4 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.35 | Skin diseases | juice |
| Rutaceace |
| Bark, seeds and fruits | 11 | 0.55 | 2 | 0.1 | Carminative, stomachic, anthelmintic | Powder, paste, extract |
| Saxifragaceae |
| Whole plant | 5 | 0.25 | 5 | 0.25 | Asthma, stomach pain | Poultice, paste, infusion |
| Scrophulariaceae |
| Leaves and flowers | 8 | 0.4 | 7 | 0.35 | Respiratory disorders | Powder, infusion |
| Taxaceae |
| Bark | 10 | 0.5 | 7 | 0.35 | Cancer | Decoction |
| Urticaceae |
| Root, aerial parts | 6 | 0.3 | 6 | 0.3 | Dandruff and baldness | Decoction |
Fig. 2Number of species represented by each species
Fig. 3Plant parts used by traditional healers
Fig. 4Mode of preparation of medicinal plants
Categories of ailments and informant consensus factor (FIC) for each category
| Sample No. | Use categories | Uses under each category | Number of taxa | Number of use report | Fic | FL | Most uses species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Infectious diseases | Jaundice, hepatitis, typhoid, fever, tuberculosis | 7 | 75 | 0.92 | 95 |
|
| 2 | Disease of the ear | Earache | 3 | 8 | 0.71 | 35 |
|
| 3 | Diseases of the circulatory system | Blood purifier, hemorrhage, anemia | 3 | 12 | 0.82 | 55 |
|
| 4 | Diseases of the respiratory system | Asthma, cold and cough | 6 | 74 | 0.93 | 45 |
|
| 5 | Diseases of the digestive system | Diarrhea, digestion, stomach disorder, ulcer, constipation, dysentery, dyspepsia | 24 | 233 | 0.90 | 35 |
|
| 6 | Injury, poisoning and some other consequences of external cause | Skin allergies, wound healing, bone dislocation, bone fracture | 11 | 134 | 0.92 | 60 |
|
| 7 | Diseases of the musculoskeletal system | Rheumatism, joint pain | 6 | 58 | 0.91 | 90 |
|
| 8 | Diseases of the urinary system | Diuretic | 1 | 15 | 1.00 | 20 |
|
| 9 | Cardiac diseases | Heart diseases | 1 | 18 | 1.00 | 65 |
|
| 10 | Liver disorders | Liver diseases | 2 | 19 | 0.94 | 90 |
|
| 11 | Cancerous diseases | Cancer, tumor | 3 | 32 | 0.94 | 35 |
|
| 12 | Dandruff and baldness | Dandruff | 1 | 10 | 1.00 | 30 |
|
| 13 | Used for abortion and miscarriage | Used for abortion and miscarriage | 1 | 10 | 1.00 | 60 |
|
Direct matrix ranking (DMR) of tree species with different uses other than medicinal value (total score of 10 informants) in the study area
| Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction | 40 | 49 | 12 | 56 | 32 | 55 | 55 | 48 |
| Hedge, Fencing | 18 | 10 | 20 | 12 | 07 | 15 | 15 | 10 |
| Fire wood | 14 | 55 | 15 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 49 | 26 |
| Cash income | 43 | 22 | 31 | 56 | 71 | 12 | 22 | 15 |
| Fodder | 9 | 17 | 15 | 24 | 20 | 17 | 34 | 10 |
| Fruit, Food | 08 | 09 | 04 | 20 | 34 | 02 | 08 | 05 |
| Total | 132 | 162 | 97 | 196 | 180 | 113 | 183 | 114 |
| Rank | 5th | 4th | 8th | 1st | 3rd | 7th | 2nd | 6th |
Priority ranking (PR) of factors perceived as threats to plant biodiversity based on their level of destructive effects in the study area
| Threats | Respondent (R1–R6) | Total | Percentage (%) | Rank | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | ||||
| Construction | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 29 | 18.71 | 3rd |
| Timber mafia/export | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 33 | 21.29 | 1st |
| Urbanization | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 19.35 | 2nd |
| Agriculture extension | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 13.55 | 4th |
| Fuel and Fodder | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 10.97 | 5th |
Jaccard index comparing the present study with previous reports at the regional, national, and global scales
| Area | Study year | Number of recorded plant species | Plants with similar use | Plants with dissimilar use | Total species common in both area | Species enlisted only in aligned areas | Species enlisted only in study area | Percentage of plant with similar uses | Percentage of dissimilar uses | JI | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toli Peer A.K, Pakistan | 2017 | 121 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 106 | 63 | 7.44 | 4.96 | 9.74 | [ |
| Sharda, Neelum Valley | 2012 | 39 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 17 | 28 | 30.77 | 25.64 | 95.65 | [ |
| Abbottabad, Northern Pakistan | 2014 | 120 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 114 | 44 | 1.67 | 3.33 | 3.95 | [ |
| Senhsa, District Kotli A.K, Pakistan | 2012 | 112 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 99 | 37 | 5.36 | 6.25 | 10.57 | [ |
| Hangu North KPK Pakistan, | 2014 | 67 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 65 | 48 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.80 | [ |
| Kashmir Himalayas, Pakistan | 2012 | 71 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 64 | 43 | 4.23 | 5.63 | 7.00 | [ |
| Central Karakoram national Park, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan | 2011 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 48 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.20 | [ |
| Naran Valley, Pakistan | 2013 | 101 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 91 | 40 | 4.95 | 4.95 | 8.26 | [ |
| Garhwal Himalaya, India | 2013 | 152 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 144 | 42 | 1.32 | 3.95 | 4.49 | [ |
| District Bhimber A.K, Pakistan | 2013 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 56 | 48 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.96 | [ |
| Leepa Valley, Muzaffarabad (AJK), Pakistan | 2012 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 46 | 8.33 | 2.78 | 5.41 | [ |
| Makawanpur District, Central Nepal | 2014 | 161 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 158 | 47 | 1.24 | 0.62 | 1.49 | [ |
| Terai forest, Western Nepal | 2012 | 66 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 63 | 47 | 3.03 | 1.52 | 2.80 | [ |
| Rasuwa District, Central Nepal | 2010 | 60 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 56 | 46 | 5.00 | 1.67 | 4.08 | [ |
| Jakholi block, Rudraprayag, India | 2017 | 78 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66 | 38 | 10.26 | 5.13 | 13.04 | [ |
Correlation between use value and relative frequency of citation
| Correlations | UV | RFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV | Pearson correlation | 1 | .500a |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .000 | ||
|
| 50 | 50 | |
| RFC | Pearson correlation | .500a | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .000 | ||
|
| 50 | 50 |
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
R 2 = 0.25
Fig. 5Association between use value and relative frequency of citation