| Literature DB >> 23984919 |
Ermias Lulekal1, Zemede Asfaw, Ensermu Kelbessa, Patrick Van Damme.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ankober District has long been inhabited by people who have a long tradition of using medicinal plants to treat human ailments. Overexploitation of medicinal plants coupled with an ever-increasing population growth, deforestation and agricultural land expansion threatens plants in the area. Hence, this study aimed at documenting and analyzing the plant-based ethnomedicinal knowledge of the people in order to preserve the dwindling indigenous knowledge.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23984919 PMCID: PMC3846447 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Figure 1Map of the study area.
Statistical test of significance, t-test, on average number of reported medicinal plants among different informant groups in Ankober District
| Gender | Male | 235 | 4.23 ± 0.13 | 1.61 | 0.1075 |
| Female | 117 | 3.85 ± 0.19 | |||
| Age | Young members | 122 | 2.59 ±0.08 | −11.65 | 0.0001* |
| Senior members | 230 | 4.90 ± 0.13 | |||
| Literacy level | Illiterate | 85 | 4.73 ± 0.11 | −11.90 | 0.0001* |
| Literate | 267 | 2.12 ± 0.10 | |||
| Distance from health centres | Proximity to health centre | 80 | 4.22 ± 0.22 | 0.57 | 0.5681 |
| Far away from health centre | 272 | 4.07 ±0.12 | |||
| Experience (Informant category) | Key/knowledgeable | 88 | 6.94 ± 0.16 | 23.88 | 0.0001* |
| General informant | 264 | 3.16 ± 0.07 |
*Significant difference (p < 0.05); ** t(0.05) (two tailed), df = 350, N = number of respondents.
Figure 2Plant parts used for remedy preparation in Ankober District.
Figure 3Modes of remedy preparation and application in Ankober District.
ICF values of traditional medicinal plants for treating human ailments in Ankober
| 1 | Gastro-intestinal and parasitic | 20 | 14.81 | 65 | 19.75 | 0.70 |
| 2 | Dermatological | 13 | 9.62 | 41 | 12.46 | 0.70 |
| 3 | Respiratory | 7 | 5.18 | 18 | 5.47 | 0.65 |
| 4 | Oral, dental and pharyngeal | 6 | 4.44 | 14 | 4.25 | 0.62 |
| 5 | Sensorial | 8 | 5.92 | 17 | 5.16 | 0.56 |
| 6 | Urogenital and venereal | 15 | 11.11 | 30 | 9.11 | 0.52 |
| 7 | Febrile | 11 | 8.14 | 21 | 6.38 | 0.5 |
| 8 | External injuries, bleeding and snake bite | 13 | 9.62 | 19 | 5.77 | 0.33 |
| 9 | Musculoskeletal and nervous system | 21 | 15.55 | 28 | 8.51 | 0.26 |
| 10 | Blood and lymphatic system | 18 | 13.33 | 24 | 7.29 | 0.26 |
| 11 | Evil spirit | 21 | 15.55 | 22 | 6.68 | 0.05 |
| 12 | Others | 29 | 21.48 | 31 | 9.42 | 0.06 |
Fidelity Level value of medicinal plants commonly reported against a given ailment category
| 1 | Febrile | 19 | 20 | 95 | |
| 2 | Gastro-intestinal and parasitic | 15 | 16 | 93.75 | |
| 3 | Febrile | 14 | 15 | 93.33 | |
| 4 | Gastro-intestinal and parasitic | 22 | 24 | 91.6 | |
| 5 | Evil spirit | 17 | 19 | 89.47 | |
| 6 | Dermatological | 23 | 26 | 88.46 | |
| 7 | Gastro-intestinal and parasitic | 14 | 16 | 87.5 | |
| 8 | External injuries, bleeding and snake bite | 11 | 13 | 84.6 | |
| 9 | Gastro-intestinal and parasitic | 10 | 13 | 76.92 | |
| 10 | Dermatological | 15 | 18 | 83.33 | |
| 11 | Urogenital and venereal | 7 | 10 | 70 |
Average DMR score of fifteen key informants for ten medicinal plants species with additional uses besides medicinal value
| Agricultural tool | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | ||
| Construction | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Lumbering | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Firewood | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Charcoal | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | ||
| Medicine | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ||
| | ||||||||||||
Based on use criteria (5 = best; 4 = very good; 3 = good;2 = less used; 1 = least used and 0 = no value).
Preference ranking of medicinal plants reported for treating atopic eczema
| 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 81 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 36 | ||
| 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 32 | ||
| 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 67 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 76 | ||
| 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 90 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 38 | ||
N:B-Scores in the table indicate ranks given to medicinal plants based on their efficacy. Highest number (7) given for the medicinal plant which informants thought most effective in treating atopic eczema and the lowest number (1) for the least effective plant.