Literature DB >> 31209592

Multi-detector CT for suspected hip fragility fractures: A diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mostafa Alabousi1, Isabelle D Gauthier2, Nicole Li2, Gonçalo Mf Dos Santos2, Dmitry Golev3, Michael N Patlas4, Abdullah Alabousi5.   

Abstract

To perform a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) for detecting proximal femoral (hip) fragility fractures in patients with a negative initial radiograph. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies published between January 2000 and May 2018. Articles underwent title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. Study inclusion criteria are patients with suspected hip fracture, negative initial radiograph, MDCT as the index test, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical follow-up as the reference standard, and DTA measure as the outcome. Demographic, methodologic, and study outcome data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. DTA metrics were pooled using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. From an initial 1385 studies, four studies reporting on 418 patients (174 with hip fractures) were included. Pooled summary statistics included the following: sensitivity (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79-93), specificity (98%; 95% CI 95-99), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.972). MDCT has a high specificity for detecting hip fragility fractures, comparable to MRI, but a lower sensitivity. Local institutional factors may play a role in whether a patient receives MDCT or MRI, as imaging should not be delayed. If there is ongoing concern for fracture in a patient with a negative MDCT, MRI should be performed. Cautious interpretation of the results is warranted given the risk of bias and small sample size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fractures; Meta-analysis; Multi-detector computed tomography; Sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209592     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01696-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  36 in total

Review 1.  Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research.

Authors:  Matthew D F McInnes; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Length of stay, mortality, morbidity and delay to surgery in hip fractures.

Authors:  K A Lefaivre; S A Macadam; D J Davidson; R Gandhi; H Chan; H M Broekhuyse
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-07

4.  Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Saoussen Ftouh; Antonia Morga; Cameron Swift
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-21

5.  Computed tomography for occult fractures of the proximal femur, pelvis, and sacrum in clinical practice: single institution, dual-site experience.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Michael J Weaver; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-01-11

6.  The sensitivity of ct scans in diagnosing occult femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Z Sadozai; R Davies; J Warner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Andrew B Ross; Brian Y Chan; Paul H Yi; Michael D Repplinger; David J Vanness; Kenneth S Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Imaging choices in occult hip fracture.

Authors:  Jesse Cannon; Salvatore Silvestri; Mark Munro
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Irene Papanicolas; Liana R Woskie; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Investigation of occult hip fractures: the use of CT and MRI.

Authors:  S K Gill; J Smith; R Fox; T J S Chesser
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Update on Imaging-Based Measurement of Bone Mineral Density and Quality.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Galateia Kazakia
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Clinical utility of a focused hip MRI for assessing suspected hip fracture in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ellen X Sun; Jacob C Mandell; Michael J Weaver; Vera Kimbrell; Mitchel B Harris; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.