Literature DB >> 33711014

Assessing the contribution of tumor mutational phenotypes to cancer progression risk.

Yifeng Tao1,2, Ashok Rajaraman1, Xiaoyue Cui1,2, Ziyi Cui1, Haoran Chen1,2, Yuanqi Zhao1, Jesse Eaton1, Hannah Kim1, Jian Ma1, Russell Schwartz1,3.   

Abstract

Cancer occurs via an accumulation of somatic genomic alterations in a process of clonal evolution. There has been intensive study of potential causal mutations driving cancer development and progression. However, much recent evidence suggests that tumor evolution is normally driven by a variety of mechanisms of somatic hypermutability, which act in different combinations or degrees in different cancers. These variations in mutability phenotypes are predictive of progression outcomes independent of the specific mutations they have produced to date. Here we explore the question of how and to what degree these differences in mutational phenotypes act in a cancer to predict its future progression. We develop a computational paradigm using evolutionary tree inference (tumor phylogeny) algorithms to derive features quantifying single-tumor mutational phenotypes, followed by a machine learning framework to identify key features predictive of progression. Analyses of breast invasive carcinoma and lung carcinoma demonstrate that a large fraction of the risk of future clinical outcomes of cancer progression-overall survival and disease-free survival-can be explained solely from mutational phenotype features derived from the phylogenetic analysis. We further show that mutational phenotypes have additional predictive power even after accounting for traditional clinical and driver gene-centric genomic predictors of progression. These results confirm the importance of mutational phenotypes in contributing to cancer progression risk and suggest strategies for enhancing the predictive power of conventional clinical data or driver-centric biomarkers.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33711014      PMCID: PMC7990181          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  55 in total

1.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

Review 2.  A new genome-driven integrated classification of breast cancer and its implications.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Dawson; Oscar M Rueda; Samuel Aparicio; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  International Cancer Genome Consortium Data Portal--a one-stop shop for cancer genomics data.

Authors:  Junjun Zhang; Joachim Baran; A Cros; Jonathan M Guberman; Syed Haider; Jack Hsu; Yong Liang; Elena Rivkin; Jianxin Wang; Brett Whitty; Marie Wong-Erasmus; Long Yao; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Inferring models of multiscale copy number evolution for single-tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; E Michael Gertz; Darawalee Wangsa; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  MuSE: accounting for tumor heterogeneity using a sample-specific error model improves sensitivity and specificity in mutation calling from sequencing data.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Liu Xi; Daniel S T Hughes; Jianjun Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; P Andrew Futreal; David A Wheeler; Wenyi Wang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kishikawa; Yukihide Momozawa; Takeshi Ozeki; Taisei Mushiroda; Hidenori Inohara; Yoichiro Kamatani; Michiaki Kubo; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The evolution of the unstable cancer genome.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Phylogenetic analysis of multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization data from tumor cell populations.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; Stanley E Shackney; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes.

Authors:  Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Paz Polak; Gregory V Kryukov; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Sivachenko; Scott L Carter; Chip Stewart; Craig H Mermel; Steven A Roberts; Adam Kiezun; Peter S Hammerman; Aaron McKenna; Yotam Drier; Lihua Zou; Alex H Ramos; Trevor J Pugh; Nicolas Stransky; Elena Helman; Jaegil Kim; Carrie Sougnez; Lauren Ambrogio; Elizabeth Nickerson; Erica Shefler; Maria L Cortés; Daniel Auclair; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Michael Noble; Daniel DiCara; Pei Lin; Lee Lichtenstein; David I Heiman; Timothy Fennell; Marcin Imielinski; Bryan Hernandez; Eran Hodis; Sylvan Baca; Austin M Dulak; Jens Lohr; Dan-Avi Landau; Catherine J Wu; Jorge Melendez-Zajgla; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Amnon Koren; Steven A McCarroll; Jaume Mora; Brian Crompton; Robert Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Wendy Winckler; Kristin Ardlie; Stacey B Gabriel; Charles W M Roberts; Jaclyn A Biegel; Kimberly Stegmaier; Adam J Bass; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Dmitry A Gordenin; Shamil Sunyaev; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Algorithms to model single gene, single chromosome, and whole genome copy number changes jointly in tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; Stanley E Shackney; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.