Literature DB >> 26151317

Chromosomal instability, tolerance of mitotic errors and multidrug resistance are promoted by tetraploidization in human cells.

Anastasia Y Kuznetsova1, Katarzyna Seget, Giuliana K Moeller, Mirjam S de Pagter, Jeroen A D M de Roos, Milena Dürrbaum, Christian Kuffer, Stefan Müller, Guido J R Zaman, Wigard P Kloosterman, Zuzana Storchová.   

Abstract

Up to 80% of human cancers, in particular solid tumors, contain cells with abnormal chromosomal numbers, or aneuploidy, which is often linked with marked chromosomal instability. Whereas in some tumors the aneuploidy occurs by missegregation of one or a few chromosomes, aneuploidy can also arise during proliferation of inherently unstable tetraploid cells generated by whole genome doubling from diploid cells. Recent findings from cancer genome sequencing projects suggest that nearly 40% of tumors underwent whole genome doubling at some point of tumorigenesis, yet its contribution to cancer phenotypes and benefits for malignant growth remain unclear. Here, we investigated the consequences of a whole genome doubling in both cancerous and non-transformed p53 positive human cells. SNP array analysis and multicolor karyotyping revealed that induced whole-genome doubling led to variable aneuploidy. We found that chromosomal instability (CIN) is a frequent, but not a default outcome of whole genome doubling. The CIN phenotypes were accompanied by increased tolerance to mitotic errors that was mediated by suppression of the p53 signaling. Additionally, the expression of pro-apoptotic factors, such as iASPP and cIAP2, was downregulated. Furthermore, we found that whole genome doubling promotes resistance to a broad spectrum of chemotherapeutic drugs and stimulates anchorage-independent growth even in non-transformed p53-positive human cells. Taken together, whole genome doubling provides multifaceted benefits for malignant growth. Our findings provide new insight why genome-doubling promotes tumorigenesis and correlates with poor survival in cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CIN; aneuploidy; cancer; drug resistance; p53; tetraploidy; whole genome doubling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26151317      PMCID: PMC4614355          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1068482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  48 in total

Review 1.  From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer.

Authors:  Zuzana Storchova; David Pellman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Apoptosis regulation in tetraploid cancer cells.

Authors:  Maria Castedo; Arnaud Coquelle; Sonia Vivet; Ilio Vitale; Audrey Kauffmann; Philippe Dessen; Marie O Pequignot; Noelia Casares; Alexandre Valent; Shahul Mouhamad; Elise Schmitt; Nazanine Modjtahedi; William Vainchenker; Laurence Zitvogel; Vladimir Lazar; Carmen Garrido; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Overexpression of TGF alpha in transgenic mice: induction of epithelial hyperplasia, pancreatic metaplasia, and carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  E P Sandgren; N C Luetteke; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster; D C Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Characterization of the p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint following spindle disruption.

Authors:  J S Lanni; T Jacks
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Repression of the MSP/MST-1 gene contributes to the antiapoptotic gain of function of mutant p53.

Authors:  A Zalcenstein; L Weisz; P Stambolsky; J Bar; V Rotter; M Oren
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Genetic instability in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujiwara; Madhavi Bandi; Masayuki Nitta; Elena V Ivanova; Roderick T Bronson; David Pellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Caspase-1 is a direct target gene of ETS1 and plays a role in ETS1-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Huiping Pei; Chunyang Li; Yair Adereth; Tien Hsu; Dennis K Watson; Runzhao Li
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors.

Authors:  S E Shackney; C A Smith; B W Miller; D R Burholt; K Murtha; H R Giles; D M Ketterer; A A Pollice
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Dual-specificity phosphatase 5 (DUSP5) as a direct transcriptional target of tumor suppressor p53.

Authors:  Koji Ueda; Hirofumi Arakawa; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  68 in total

1.  Tetraploidy and CIN: a dangerous combination.

Authors:  Sally Dewhurst; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  RNA- binding protein Stau2 is important for spindle integrity and meiosis progression in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Yan Cao; Juan Du; Dandan Chen; Qian Wang; Nana Zhang; Xiaoyun Liu; Xiaoyu Liu; Jing Weng; Yuanjing Liang; Wei Ma
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Aneuploidy, TP53 mutation, and amplification of MYC correlate with increased intratumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Johanna Oltmann; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Leanora S Hernandez; Rüdiger Meyer; Irianna Torres; Yue Hu; Natalie Doberstein; J Keith Killian; David Petersen; Yuelin Jack Zhu; Daniel C Edelman; Paul S Meltzer; Russell Schwartz; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  The evolutionary significance of polyploidy.

Authors:  Yves Van de Peer; Eshchar Mizrachi; Kathleen Marchal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The ISWI ATPase Smarca5 (Snf2h) Is Required for Proliferation and Differentiation of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Juraj Kokavec; Tomas Zikmund; Filipp Savvulidi; Vojtech Kulvait; Winfried Edelmann; Arthur I Skoultchi; Tomas Stopka
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 6.  Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Sansregret; Bart Vanhaesebroeck; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  A PoleP286R mouse model of endometrial cancer recapitulates high mutational burden and immunotherapy response.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Li; Changzheng Lu; He Zhang; Qing Hu; Junqiu Zhang; Ileana C Cuevas; Subhransu S Sahoo; Mitzi Aguilar; Elizabeth G Maurais; Shanrong Zhang; Xiaojing Wang; Esra A Akbay; Guo-Min Li; Bo Li; Prasad Koduru; Peter Ly; Yang-Xin Fu; Diego H Castrillon
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 8.  Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.

Authors:  Marco Raffaele Cosenza; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  A Soft Microenvironment Protects from Failure of Midbody Abscission and Multinucleation Downstream of the EMT-Promoting Transcription Factor Snail.

Authors:  Allison K Simi; Alişya A Anlaş; Melody Stallings-Mann; Sherry Zhang; Tiffaney Hsia; Magdalena Cichon; Derek C Radisky; Celeste M Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Isabel Quintanilla; Keyvan Torabi; Maria Vila-Casadesús; Amaia Ercilla; Gregory Klus; Zeynep Yuce; Claudia Galofré; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Juan José Lozano; Neus Agell; Daniela Cimini; Antoni Castells; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.