Literature DB >> 29178486

Developing and characterizing MR/CT-visible materials used in QA phantoms for MRgRT systems.

Angela Steinmann1, R Jason Stafford2, Gabriel Sawakuchi1, Zhifei Wen1, Laurence Court1, Clifton D Fuller3, David Followill1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Synthetic tissue equivalent (STE) materials currently used to simulate tumor and surrounding tissues for IROC-Houston's anthropomorphic head and thorax QA phantoms cannot be visualized using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The purpose of this study was to characterize dual MR/CT-visible STE materials that can be used in an end-to-end QA phantom for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) modalities.
METHODS: Over 80 materials' MR, CT, and dosimetric STE properties were investigated for use in MRgRT QA phantoms. The materials tested included homogeneous and heterogeneous materials to simulate soft tissue/tumor and lung tissues. Materials were scanned on a Siemens' Magnetom Espree 1.5 T using four sequences, which showed the materials visual contrast between T1- and T2-weighted images. Each material's Hounsfield number and electron density data was collected using a GE's CT Lightspeed Simulator. Dosimetric properties were examined by constructing a 10 × 10 × 20 cm3 phantom of the selected STE materials that was divided into three sections: anterior, middle, and posterior. Anterior and posterior pieces were composed of polystyrene, whereas the middle section was substituted with the selected STE materials. EBT3 film was inserted into the phantom's midline and was irradiated using an Elekta's Versa 6 MV beam with a prescription of 6 Gy at 1.5 cm and varying field size of: 10 × 10 cm2 , 6 × 6 cm2 , and 3 × 3 cm2 . Measured film PDD curves were compared to planning system calculations and conventional STE materials' percent depth dose (PDD) curves.
RESULTS: The majority of the tested materials showed comparable CT attenuation properties to their respective organ site; however, most of the tested materials were not visible on either T1- or T2-weighted MR images. Silicone, hydrocarbon, synthetic gelatin, and liquid PVC plastic-based materials showed good MR image contrast. In-house lung equivalent materials made with either silicone- or hydrocarbon-based materials had HUs ranging from: -978 to -117 and -667 to -593, respectively. Synthetic gelatin and PVC plastic-based materials resembled soft tissue/tumor equivalent materials and had HUs of: -175 to -170 and -29 to 32, respectively. PDD curves of the selected MR/CT-visible materials were comparable to IROC-Houston's conventional phantom STE materials. The smallest field size showed the largest disagreements, where the average discrepancies between calculated and measured PDD curves were 1.8% and 5.9% for homogeneous and heterogeneous testing materials, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Gelatin, liquid plastic, and hydrocarbon-based materials were determined as alternative STE substitutes for MRgRT QA phantoms.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI -guided radiotherapy; MRgRT; anthropomorphic QA phantoms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29178486      PMCID: PMC5807190          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  Andrea Molineu; David S Followill; Peter A Balter; William F Hanson; Michael T Gillin; M Saiful Huq; Avraham Eisbruch; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Compensating for the impact of non-stationary spherical air cavities on IMRT dose delivery in transverse magnetic fields.

Authors:  G H Bol; J J W Lagendijk; B W Raaymakers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  A facility for magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Marco C Carlone; Michael F Milosevic; Stephen L Breen; Teodor Stanescu; Alexandra Rink; Hamideh Alasti; Anna Simeonov; Michael C Sweitzer; Jeffrey D Winter
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  The rotating biplanar linac-magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  Biagio Gino Fallone
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 6.  The magnetic resonance imaging-linac system.

Authors:  Jan J W Lagendijk; Bas W Raaymakers; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.

Authors:  Phil Prior; Xinfeng Chen; Maikel Botros; Eric S Paulson; Colleen Lawton; Beth Erickson; X Allen Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Review of potential improvements using MRI in the radiotherapy workflow.

Authors:  Alberto Torresin; Maria Grazia Brambilla; Angelo F Monti; Alessio Moscato; Marc A Brockmann; Lothar Schad; Ulrike I Attenberger; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.820

9.  Technical Note: Multipurpose CT, ultrasound, and MRI breast phantom for use in radiotherapy and minimally invasive interventions.

Authors:  Mark Ruschin; Sean R H Davidson; William Phounsy; Tae Sun Yoo; Lee Chin; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Ananth Ravi; Claire McCann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms.

Authors:  David S Followill; DeeAnn Radford Evans; Christopher Cherry; Andrea Molineu; Gary Fisher; William F Hanson; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical imaging phantoms for simulation of tumor heterogeneity in PET, CT, and MRI: An overview of existing designs.

Authors:  Alejandra Valladares; Thomas Beyer; Ivo Rausch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The role of dosimetry audit in achieving high quality radiotherapy.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Núria Jornet; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21

3.  Standard MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI phantoms: a novel concept using MRI-visible polymer.

Authors:  Martin Meyerspeer; Ewald Unger; Ivo Rausch; Alejandra Valladares; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Thomas Beyer; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-02-18

4.  Development of an anthropomorphic multimodality pelvic phantom for quantitative evaluation of a deep-learning-based synthetic computed tomography generation technique.

Authors:  Hyeongmin Jin; Sung Young Lee; Hyun Joon An; Chang Heon Choi; Eui Kyu Chie; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jong Min Park; Sukwon Park; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 5.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Mechanical and medical imaging properties of 3D-printed materials as tissue equivalent materials.

Authors:  Depeng Ma; Ronghui Gao; Minghui Li; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.