Literature DB >> 25559321

Compensating for the impact of non-stationary spherical air cavities on IMRT dose delivery in transverse magnetic fields.

G H Bol1, J J W Lagendijk, B W Raaymakers.   

Abstract

With the development of the 1.5 T MRI linear accelerator and the clinical introduction of the 0.35 T ViewRay™ system, delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in a transverse magnetic field becomes increasingly important. When delivering dose in the presence of a transverse magnetic field, one of the most prominent phenomena occurs around air cavities: the electron return effect (ERE). For stationary, spherical air cavities which are centrally located in the phantom, the ERE can be compensated by using opposing beams configurations in combination with IMRT. In this paper we investigate the effects of non-stationary spherical air cavities, centrally located within the target in a phantom containing no organs at risk, on IMRT dose delivery in 0.35 T and 1.5 T transverse magnetic fields by using Monte Carlo simulations. We show that IMRT can be used for compensating ERE around those air cavities, except for intrafraction appearing or disappearing air cavities. For these cases, gating or plan re-optimization should be used. We also analyzed the option of using IMRT plans optimized at 0 T to be delivered in the presence of 0.35 T and 1.5 T magnetic field. When delivering dose at 0.35 T, IMRT plans optimized at 0 T and 0.35 T perform equally well regarding ERE compensation. Within a 1.5 T environment, the 1.5 T optimized plans perform slightly better for the static and random intra- and interfraction air cavity movement cases than the 0 T optimized plans. For non-stationary spherical air cavities with a baseline shift (intra- and interfraction) the 0 T optimized plans perform better. These observations show the intrinsic ERE compensation by equidistant and opposing beam configurations for spherical air cavities within the target area. IMRT gives some additional compensation, but only in case of correct positioning of the air cavity according to the IMRT compensation. For intrafraction appearing or disappearing air cavities this correct positioning is absent and gating or plan re-optimization should be used.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25559321     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Bin Li; Liyuan Chen; Ming Yang; Yifei Lou; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  New concept on an integrated interior magnetic resonance imaging and medical linear accelerator system for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Zhen Tian; Yan Xi; Steve B Jiang; Ge Wang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Developing and characterizing MR/CT-visible materials used in QA phantoms for MRgRT systems.

Authors:  Angela Steinmann; R Jason Stafford; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Zhifei Wen; Laurence Court; Clifton D Fuller; David Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with an MR-linac - Quantifying the impact of the magnetic field and real-time tumor tracking.

Authors:  Martin J Menten; Martin F Fast; Simeon Nill; Cornelis P Kamerling; Fiona McDonald; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system.

Authors:  Paola Godoy Scripes; Ergys Subashi; Sarah Burleson; Jiayi Liang; Paul Romesser; Christopher Crane; James Mechalakos; Margie Hunt; Neelam Tyagi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Radiation-induced lung toxicity in mice irradiated in a strong magnetic field.

Authors:  Ashley E Rubinstein; Skylar Gay; Christine B Peterson; Charles V Kingsley; Ramesh C Tailor; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Adam D Melancon; David S Followill; Laurence E Court
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Planning feasibility of extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator.

Authors:  Mariska D den Hartogh; Hans C J de Boer; Eline N de Groot-van Breugel; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Jochem Hes; Uulke A van der Heide; Floris Pos; Karin Haustermans; Tom Depuydt; Robert Jan Smeenk; Martina Kunze-Busch; Bas W Raaymakers; Linda G W Kerkmeijer
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07-15

8.  Investigating the effect of a magnetic field on dose distributions at phantom-air interfaces using PRESAGE® 3D dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Filipa Costa; Simon J Doran; Ian M Hanson; Simeon Nill; Ilias Billas; David Shipley; Simon Duane; John Adamovics; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Magnetic field dose effects on different radiation beam geometries for hypofractionated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Anthony Kim; Stephanie Lim-Reinders; Claire McCann; Syed Bilal Ahmad; Arjun Sahgal; Justin Lee; Brian M Keller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Impact of Magnetic Field on Dose Distribution in MR-Guided Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Wenlong Xia; Ke Zhang; Minghui Li; Yuan Tian; Kuo Men; Jingbo Wang; Junlin Yi; Yexiong Li; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.