Literature DB >> 31265154

Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13.

Jianlin Cheng1, Myong-Ho Choe2, Arne Elofsson3, Kun-Sop Han2, Jie Hou1, Ali H A Maghrabi4, Liam J McGuffin4, David Menéndez-Hurtado3, Kliment Olechnovič5, Torsten Schwede6,7, Gabriel Studer6,7, Karolis Uziela3, Česlovas Venclovas5, Björn Wallner8.   

Abstract

Methods to reliably estimate the accuracy of 3D models of proteins are both a fundamental part of most protein folding pipelines and important for reliable identification of the best models when multiple pipelines are used. Here, we describe the progress made from CASP12 to CASP13 in the field of estimation of model accuracy (EMA) as seen from the progress of the most successful methods in CASP13. We show small but clear progress, that is, several methods perform better than the best methods from CASP12 when tested on CASP13 EMA targets. Some progress is driven by applying deep learning and residue-residue contacts to model accuracy prediction. We show that the best EMA methods select better models than the best servers in CASP13, but that there exists a great potential to improve this further. Also, according to the evaluation criteria based on local similarities, such as lDDT and CAD, it is now clear that single model accuracy methods perform relatively better than consensus-based methods.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31265154      PMCID: PMC6851425          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  48 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

6.  Smooth orientation-dependent scoring function for coarse-grained protein quality assessment.

Authors:  Mikhail Karasikov; Guillaume Pagès; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Methods for estimation of model accuracy in CASP12.

Authors:  Arne Elofsson; Keehyoung Joo; Chen Keasar; Jooyoung Lee; Ali H A Maghrabi; Balachandran Manavalan; Liam J McGuffin; David Ménendez Hurtado; Claudio Mirabello; Robert Pilstål; Tomer Sidi; Karolis Uziela; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-10-17

8.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation.

Authors:  J M Word; S C Lovell; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Protein single-model quality assessment by feature-based probability density functions.

Authors:  Renzhi Cao; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms.

Authors:  Karolis Uziela; Nanjiang Shu; Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  15 in total

1.  Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.

Authors:  Jonghun Won; Minkyung Baek; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Modeling SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the CASP-commons experiment.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; John Moult; Wendy M Billings; Dennis Della Corte; Krzysztof Fidelis; Sohee Kwon; Kliment Olechnovič; Chaok Seok; Česlovas Venclovas; Jonghun Won
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-05

3.  Improved Protein Model Quality Assessment By Integrating Sequential And Pairwise Features Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Protein model accuracy estimation empowered by deep learning and inter-residue distance prediction in CASP14.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Jian Liu; Zhiye Guo; Tianqi Wu; Jie Hou; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Mirko Torrisi; Gianluca Pollastri; Quan Le
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 6.  Machine Learning Approaches for Quality Assessment of Protein Structures.

Authors:  Jiarui Chen; Shirley W I Siu
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-04-17

7.  A systematic structural comparison of all solved small proteins deposited in PDB. The effect of disulfide bonds in protein fold.

Authors:  Mariana H Moreira; Fabio C L Almeida; Tatiana Domitrovic; Fernando L Palhano
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 8.  Graph representation learning for structural proteomics.

Authors:  Romanos Fasoulis; Georgios Paliouras; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

9.  QDeep: distance-based protein model quality estimation by residue-level ensemble error classifications using stacked deep residual neural networks.

Authors:  Md Hossain Shuvo; Sutanu Bhattacharya; Debswapna Bhattacharya
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Deep Learning-Based Advances in Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Subash C Pakhrin; Bikash Shrestha; Badri Adhikari; Dukka B Kc
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.