Raman Baweja1, Katherine M Curci2, Jessica Yingst3, Susan Veldheer3, Shari Hrabovsky3, Stephen J Wilson4, Travis T Nichols4, Thomas Eissenberg5, Jonathan Foulds3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Penn State University College of Medicine, 500 University Dr. Hershey PA 17033 USA. 2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. 3. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, PA. 5. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the last five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. METHOD: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data was analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. RESULTS: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapor to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.
BACKGROUND: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the last five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. METHOD: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data was analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. RESULTS: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapor to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dependence; Electronic cigarette; Experience; Public Health; Smoking; Survey
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Lauren R Pacek; Olga Rass; Maggie M Sweitzer; Jason A Oliver; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Jessica Yingst; Jonathan Foulds; Susan Veldheer; Caroline O Cobb; Miao-Shan Yen; Shari Hrabovsky; Sophia I Allen; Christopher Bullen; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dominic L Palazzolo; John M Nelson; Emily A Ely; Andrew P Crow; James Distin; Stan C Kunigelis Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.566