Holly Marie Sumner1, Amy McQueen2, Michael John Scott2, Walton Sumner3. 1. St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO; 2. Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 3. Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO wsumner@dom.wustl.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A 2009 petition opposing a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban on electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) garnered international attention from e-cig users (vapers). Petitioners' comments described the perceived benefits of vaping. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of petitioners' comments. A sample of 200 petitioner names was sought in public records. Reviewers identified 13 major themes in a sample of comments, and themes related to current controversies were added. For each theme, software pattern-matching instructions (regular expressions) were developed and were used to scan comments. Agreement between reviewers and software was calculated; theme prevalence and clustering was ascertained. RESULTS: A total of 13,414 signatures and 8,285 comments from 50 states and 75 nations were collected in 6 months. Temporal patterns and name matches in public records suggest that most petitioners are authentic. Agreement between reviewers and software was moderate to high (κ = 0.4-0.8). Commonly cited themes were "e-cigs helped me quit" (34%), "a ban would be counterproductive" (15%), and "my health improved with e-cigs" (13%). Two clusters of themes emerged: the first combined comments about smoking cessation, health benefits, and smoking relapse that an e-cig ban would cause; the second combined themes that a "ban would be counterproductive," it would infringe on personal liberties, and it was motivated by government or industrial greed. People who cited mental health issues often mentioned avoiding withdrawal as a benefit of e-cigs. CONCLUSIONS: Early e-cig adopters were both frustrated and confused by discussion of a ban. They believed that e-cigs safely delivered nicotine and helped them quit smoking.
INTRODUCTION: A 2009 petition opposing a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban on electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) garnered international attention from e-cig users (vapers). Petitioners' comments described the perceived benefits of vaping. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of petitioners' comments. A sample of 200 petitioner names was sought in public records. Reviewers identified 13 major themes in a sample of comments, and themes related to current controversies were added. For each theme, software pattern-matching instructions (regular expressions) were developed and were used to scan comments. Agreement between reviewers and software was calculated; theme prevalence and clustering was ascertained. RESULTS: A total of 13,414 signatures and 8,285 comments from 50 states and 75 nations were collected in 6 months. Temporal patterns and name matches in public records suggest that most petitioners are authentic. Agreement between reviewers and software was moderate to high (κ = 0.4-0.8). Commonly cited themes were "e-cigs helped me quit" (34%), "a ban would be counterproductive" (15%), and "my health improved with e-cigs" (13%). Two clusters of themes emerged: the first combined comments about smoking cessation, health benefits, and smoking relapse that an e-cig ban would cause; the second combined themes that a "ban would be counterproductive," it would infringe on personal liberties, and it was motivated by government or industrial greed. People who cited mental health issues often mentioned avoiding withdrawal as a benefit of e-cigs. CONCLUSIONS: Early e-cig adopters were both frustrated and confused by discussion of a ban. They believed that e-cigs safely delivered nicotine and helped them quit smoking.
Authors: Raman Baweja; Katherine M Curci; Jessica Yingst; Susan Veldheer; Shari Hrabovsky; Stephen J Wilson; Travis T Nichols; Thomas Eissenberg; Jonathan Foulds Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2015-09-02
Authors: Walton Sumner; Mark S Walker; Gabrielle R Highstein; Irene Fischer; Yan Yan; Amy McQueen; Edwin B Fisher Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Clara G Sears; Joy L Hart; Kandi L Walker; Rose Marie Robertson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.390