Literature DB >> 35086911

Comparison of nicotine emissions rate, 'nicotine flux', from heated, electronic and combustible tobacco products: data, trends and recommendations for regulation.

Mario El Hourani1,2, Alan Shihadeh3,2, Soha Talih1,2, Thomas Eissenberg2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking is a major cause of disease and premature death worldwide. While nicotine is recognised as the main addictive component in tobacco smoke, the total nicotine amount emitted (nicotine yield) and the rate of nicotine emission per second ('nicotine flux') contribute to the abuse liability of a given product. These variables can be regulated for public health ends and conveniently so for electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS).
METHODS: In this study we computed nicotine flux from previously reported values of yield and puff topography for a wide range of tobacco products.
RESULTS: We found that nicotine flux varied widely across tobacco products, from less than 0.1 µg/s to more than 100 µg/s, and that since 2015 the upper limit of the ENDS nicotine flux range has risen significantly and is now approaching that of combustible cigarettes. We also found that products that differ in nicotine flux may exhibit similar nicotine yields due to differences in user puffing behavior. Nicotine flux is a tool that can be used to regulate nicotine emissions of tobacco products, including ENDS. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; nicotine; toxicology

Year:  2022        PMID: 35086911      PMCID: PMC9325916          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   6.953


  14 in total

1.  Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers.

Authors:  M V Djordjevic; S D Stellman; E Zang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Electronic cigarette effectiveness and abuse liability: predicting and regulating nicotine flux.

Authors:  Alan Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; J M Stapleton; N L Benowitz; R F Grayson; E D London
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; J Slade; T P Houston; R M Davis; S D Deitchman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  'Open-System' electronic cigarettes cannot be regulated effectively.

Authors:  Thomas Eissenberg; Eric Soule; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  Nicotine delivery and cigarette equivalents from vaping a JUULpod.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; Erin A Vogel; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.953

9.  A Qualitative Approach to Understanding Real-World Electronic Cigarette Use: Implications for Measurement and Regulation.

Authors:  Maria Cooper; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.