Literature DB >> 29167406

Inverted Encoding Models of Human Population Response Conflate Noise and Neural Tuning Width.

Taosheng Liu1, Dylan Cable2, Justin L Gardner3.   

Abstract

Channel-encoding models offer the ability to bridge different scales of neuronal measurement by interpreting population responses, typically measured with BOLD imaging in humans, as linear sums of groups of neurons (channels) tuned for visual stimulus properties. Inverting these models to form predicted channel responses from population measurements in humans seemingly offers the potential to infer neuronal tuning properties. Here, we test the ability to make inferences about neural tuning width from inverted encoding models. We examined contrast invariance of orientation selectivity in human V1 (both sexes) and found that inverting the encoding model resulted in channel response functions that became broader with lower contrast, thus apparently violating contrast invariance. Simulations showed that this broadening could be explained by contrast-invariant single-unit tuning with the measured decrease in response amplitude at lower contrast. The decrease in response lowers the signal-to-noise ratio of population responses that results in poorer population representation of orientation. Simulations further showed that increasing signal to noise makes channel response functions less sensitive to underlying neural tuning width, and in the limit of zero noise will reconstruct the channel function assumed by the model regardless of the bandwidth of single units. We conclude that our data are consistent with contrast-invariant orientation tuning in human V1. More generally, our results demonstrate that population selectivity measures obtained by encoding models can deviate substantially from the behavior of single units because they conflate neural tuning width and noise and are therefore better used to estimate the uncertainty of decoded stimulus properties.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is widely recognized that perceptual experience arises from large populations of neurons, rather than a few single units. Yet, much theory and experiment have examined links between single units and perception. Encoding models offer a way to bridge this gap by explicitly interpreting population activity as the aggregate response of many single neurons with known tuning properties. Here we use this approach to examine contrast-invariant orientation tuning of human V1. We show with experiment and modeling that due to lower signal to noise, contrast-invariant orientation tuning of single units manifests in population response functions that broaden at lower contrast, rather than remain contrast-invariant. These results highlight the need for explicit quantitative modeling when making a reverse inference from population response profiles to single-unit responses.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380398-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast; encoding model; orientation; population response

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29167406      PMCID: PMC5761616          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2453-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  107 in total

Review 1.  Linear systems analysis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Boynton; Stephen A Engel; David J Heeger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G Sclar; J H Maunsell; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Orientation decoding in human visual cortex: new insights from an unbiased perspective.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI.

Authors:  X Hu; T H Le; T Parrish; P Erhard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Computational advances towards linking BOLD and behavior.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Alexandra Krugliak; Alexander Walther; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Overlapping and distinct contributions of stimulus location and of spatial context to nonspatial visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Andrew D Sheldon; Qing Yu; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Role of Object Individuation in Attention and Visual Processing.

Authors:  Bridgitt Shea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dual Process Coding of Recalled Locations in Human Oscillatory Brain Activity.

Authors:  Mary H MacLean; Tom Bullock; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Reliable Sensory Processing in Mouse Visual Cortex through Cooperative Interactions between Somatostatin and Parvalbumin Interneurons.

Authors:  Rajeev V Rikhye; Murat Yildirim; Ming Hu; Vincent Breton-Provencher; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Neural Codes Underlying Internally Generated Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.420

6.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Revisiting the Neural Architecture of Adolescent Decision-Making: Univariate and Multivariate Evidence for System-Based Models.

Authors:  João F Guassi Moreira; Adriana S Méndez Leal; Yael H Waizman; Natalie Saragosa-Harris; Emilia Ninova; Jennifer A Silvers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Kirsten C S Adam; Joshua J Foster; Masih Rahmati; David W Sutterer; Vy A Vo
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-06-05

9.  Foreground-Background Segmentation Revealed during Natural Image Viewing.

Authors:  Paolo Papale; Andrea Leo; Luca Cecchetti; Giacomo Handjaras; Kendrick N Kay; Pietro Pietrini; Emiliano Ricciardi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  Monkey EEG links neuronal color and motion information across species and scales.

Authors:  Florian Sandhaeger; Constantin von Nicolai; Earl K Miller; Markus Siegel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.