Literature DB >> 30273337

Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Fabian A Soto1, Lauren E Vucovich2, F Gregory Ashby2.   

Abstract

Many research questions in visual perception involve determining whether stimulus properties are represented and processed independently. In visual neuroscience, there is great interest in determining whether important object dimensions are represented independently in the brain. For example, theories of face recognition have proposed either completely or partially independent processing of identity and emotional expression. Unfortunately, most previous research has only vaguely defined what is meant by "independence," which hinders its precise quantification and testing. This article develops a new quantitative framework that links signal detection theory from psychophysics and encoding models from computational neuroscience, focusing on a special form of independence defined in the psychophysics literature: perceptual separability. The new theory allowed us, for the first time, to precisely define separability of neural representations and to theoretically link behavioral and brain measures of separability. The framework formally specifies the relation between these different levels of perceptual and brain representation, providing the tools for a truly integrative research approach. In particular, the theory identifies exactly what valid inferences can be made about independent encoding of stimulus dimensions from the results of multivariate analyses of neuroimaging data and psychophysical studies. In addition, commonly used operational tests of independence are re-interpreted within this new theoretical framework, providing insights on their correct use and interpretation. Finally, we apply this new framework to the study of separability of brain representations of face identity and emotional expression (neutral/sad) in a human fMRI study with male and female participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273337      PMCID: PMC6181430          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  81 in total

1.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Wenger; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Identification of walked-upon materials in auditory, kinesthetic, haptic, and audio-haptic conditions.

Authors:  Bruno L Giordano; Yon Visell; Hsin-Yun Yao; Vincent Hayward; Jeremy R Cooperstock; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Why are some dimensions integral? Testing two hypotheses through causal learning experiments.

Authors:  Fabián A Soto; Gonzalo R Quintana; Andrés M Pérez-Acosta; Fernando P Ponce; Edgar H Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-07-09

6.  General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren Vucovich; Robert Musgrave; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

7.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex.

Authors:  M A Paradiso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: an fMRI adaptation study.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; So Young Moon; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  A computational account of the mechanisms underlying face perception biases in depression.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Rochelle A Stewart; Sanaz Hosseini; Jason Hays; Christopher G Beevers
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-07

2.  Multivoxel codes for representing and integrating acoustic features in human cortex.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Sukhbinder Kumar; Maria Chait; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.