Frank Ong1, Joseph Y Cheng2, Michael Lustig1. 1. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a general phase regularized image reconstruction method, with applications to partial Fourier imaging, water-fat imaging and flow imaging. THEORY AND METHODS: The problem of enforcing phase constraints in reconstruction was studied under a regularized inverse problem framework. A general phase regularized reconstruction algorithm was proposed to enable various joint reconstruction of partial Fourier imaging, water-fat imaging and flow imaging, along with parallel imaging (PI) and compressed sensing (CS). Since phase regularized reconstruction is inherently non-convex and sensitive to phase wraps in the initial solution, a reconstruction technique, named phase cycling, was proposed to render the overall algorithm invariant to phase wraps. The proposed method was applied to retrospectively under-sampled in vivo datasets and compared with state of the art reconstruction methods. RESULTS: Phase cycling reconstructions showed reduction of artifacts compared to reconstructions without phase cycling and achieved similar performances as state of the art results in partial Fourier, water-fat and divergence-free regularized flow reconstruction. Joint reconstruction of partial Fourier + water-fat imaging + PI + CS, and partial Fourier + divergence-free regularized flow imaging + PI + CS were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The proposed phase cycling reconstruction provides an alternative way to perform phase regularized reconstruction, without the need to perform phase unwrapping. It is robust to the choice of initial solutions and encourages the joint reconstruction of phase imaging applications. Magn Reson Med 80:112-125, 2018.
PURPOSE: To develop a general phase regularized image reconstruction method, with applications to partial Fourier imaging, water-fat imaging and flow imaging. THEORY AND METHODS: The problem of enforcing phase constraints in reconstruction was studied under a regularized inverse problem framework. A general phase regularized reconstruction algorithm was proposed to enable various joint reconstruction of partial Fourier imaging, water-fat imaging and flow imaging, along with parallel imaging (PI) and compressed sensing (CS). Since phase regularized reconstruction is inherently non-convex and sensitive to phase wraps in the initial solution, a reconstruction technique, named phase cycling, was proposed to render the overall algorithm invariant to phase wraps. The proposed method was applied to retrospectively under-sampled in vivo datasets and compared with state of the art reconstruction methods. RESULTS: Phase cycling reconstructions showed reduction of artifacts compared to reconstructions without phase cycling and achieved similar performances as state of the art results in partial Fourier, water-fat and divergence-free regularized flow reconstruction. Joint reconstruction of partial Fourier + water-fat imaging + PI + CS, and partial Fourier + divergence-free regularized flow imaging + PI + CS were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The proposed phase cycling reconstruction provides an alternative way to perform phase regularized reconstruction, without the need to perform phase unwrapping. It is robust to the choice of initial solutions and encourages the joint reconstruction of phase imaging applications. Magn Reson Med 80:112-125, 2018.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Guobin Li; Jürgen Hennig; Esther Raithel; Martin Büchert; Dominik Paul; Jan G Korvink; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Claudio Santelli; Michael Loecher; Julia Busch; Oliver Wieben; Tobias Schaeffter; Sebastian Kozerke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Charles A McKenzie; Angel R Pineda; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Anja C Brau; Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Jean H Brittain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Joseph Y Cheng; Tao Zhang; Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn; Marcus T Alley; Martin Uecker; John M Pauly; Michael Lustig; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Amanda K Funai; Jeffrey A Fessler; Desmond T B Yeo; Valur T Olafsson; Douglas C Noll Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Berkin Bilgic; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Mary Kate Manhard; Qiyuan Tian; Congyu Liao; Siddharth S Iyer; Stephen F Cauley; Susie Y Huang; Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yuxin Hu; Xiaole Wang; Qiyuan Tian; Grant Yang; Bruce Daniel; Jennifer McNab; Brian Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 4.668