Joseph Y Cheng1,2, Tao Zhang1,2, Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn3, Marcus T Alley2, Martin Uecker4, John M Pauly1, Michael Lustig4, Shreyas S Vasanawala2. 1. Magnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 3. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and assess motion correction techniques for high-resolution pediatric abdominal volumetric magnetic resonance images acquired free-breathing with high scan efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, variable-density sampling and radial-like phase-encode ordering were incorporated into the 3D Cartesian acquisition. Second, intrinsic multichannel butterfly navigators were used to measure respiratory motion. Lastly, these estimates are applied for both motion-weighted data-consistency in a compressed sensing and parallel imaging reconstruction, and for nonrigid motion correction using a localized autofocusing framework. With Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent/assent, studies were performed on 22 consecutive pediatric patients. Two radiologists independently scored the images for overall image quality, degree of motion artifacts, and sharpness of hepatic vessels and the diaphragm. The results were assessed using paired Wilcoxon test and weighted kappa coefficient for interobserver agreements. RESULTS: The complete procedure yielded significantly better overall image quality (mean score of 4.7 out of 5) when compared to using no correction (mean score of 3.4, P < 0.05) and to using motion-weighted accelerated imaging (mean score of 3.9, P < 0.05). With an average scan time of 28 seconds, the proposed method resulted in comparable image quality to conventional prospective respiratory-triggered acquisitions with an average scan time of 91 seconds (mean score of 4.5). CONCLUSION: With the proposed methods, diagnosable high-resolution abdominal volumetric scans can be obtained from free-breathing data acquisitions.
PURPOSE: To develop and assess motion correction techniques for high-resolution pediatric abdominal volumetric magnetic resonance images acquired free-breathing with high scan efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, variable-density sampling and radial-like phase-encode ordering were incorporated into the 3D Cartesian acquisition. Second, intrinsic multichannel butterfly navigators were used to measure respiratory motion. Lastly, these estimates are applied for both motion-weighted data-consistency in a compressed sensing and parallel imaging reconstruction, and for nonrigid motion correction using a localized autofocusing framework. With Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent/assent, studies were performed on 22 consecutive pediatric patients. Two radiologists independently scored the images for overall image quality, degree of motion artifacts, and sharpness of hepatic vessels and the diaphragm. The results were assessed using paired Wilcoxon test and weighted kappa coefficient for interobserver agreements. RESULTS: The complete procedure yielded significantly better overall image quality (mean score of 4.7 out of 5) when compared to using no correction (mean score of 3.4, P < 0.05) and to using motion-weighted accelerated imaging (mean score of 3.9, P < 0.05). With an average scan time of 28 seconds, the proposed method resulted in comparable image quality to conventional prospective respiratory-triggered acquisitions with an average scan time of 91 seconds (mean score of 4.5). CONCLUSION: With the proposed methods, diagnosable high-resolution abdominal volumetric scans can be obtained from free-breathing data acquisitions.
Authors: Shreyas S Vasanawala; Marcus T Alley; Brian A Hargreaves; Richard A Barth; John M Pauly; Michael Lustig Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joseph Y Cheng; Marcus T Alley; Charles H Cunningham; Shreyas S Vasanawala; John M Pauly; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Reed F Busse; Anja C S Brau; Anthony Vu; Charles R Michelich; Ersin Bayram; Richard Kijowski; Scott B Reeder; Howard A Rowley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Clifton R Haider; Houchun Harry Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Thomas Benkert; John P Mugler; David S Rigie; Daniel K Sodickson; Hersh Chandarana; Kai Tobias Block Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-04-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tao Zhang; Ufra Yousaf; Albert Hsiao; Joseph Y Cheng; Marcus T Alley; Michael Lustig; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-06-04
Authors: David Y Zeng; Jamil Shaikh; Signy Holmes; Ryan L Brunsing; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Joseph Y Cheng Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Feiyu Chen; Tao Zhang; Joseph Y Cheng; Xinwei Shi; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 4.668