Literature DB >> 25684112

Accelerating 4D flow MRI by exploiting vector field divergence regularization.

Claudio Santelli1,2, Michael Loecher3, Julia Busch2, Oliver Wieben3,4, Tobias Schaeffter1, Sebastian Kozerke1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve velocity vector field reconstruction from undersampled four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI by penalizing divergence of the measured flow field. THEORY AND METHODS: Iterative image reconstruction in which magnitude and phase are regularized separately in alternating iterations was implemented. The approach allows incorporating prior knowledge of the flow field being imaged. In the present work, velocity data were regularized to reduce divergence, using either divergence-free wavelets (DFW) or a finite difference (FD) method using the ℓ1-norm of divergence and curl. The reconstruction methods were tested on a numerical phantom and in vivo data. Results of the DFW and FD approaches were compared with data obtained with standard compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction.
RESULTS: Relative to standard CS, directional errors of vector fields and divergence were reduced by 55-60% and 38-48% for three- and six-fold undersampled data with the DFW and FD methods. Velocity vector displays of the numerical phantom and in vivo data were found to be improved upon DFW or FD reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Regularization of vector field divergence in image reconstruction from undersampled 4D flow data is a valuable approach to improve reconstruction accuracy of velocity vector fields.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow; compressed sensing; flow quantification; phase regularization; undersampling; vector field divergence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684112     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  9 in total

1.  Virtual injections using 4D flow MRI with displacement corrections and constrained probabilistic streamlines.

Authors:  Grant S Roberts; Michael W Loecher; Alma Spahic; Kevin M Johnson; Patrick A Turski; Laura B Eisenmenger; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Wall Shear Stress Estimation for 4D Flow MRI Using Navier-Stokes Equation Correction.

Authors:  Jiacheng Zhang; Sean M Rothenberger; Melissa C Brindise; Michael Markl; Vitaliy L Rayz; Pavlos P Vlachos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Assessment of 4D flow MRI's quality by verifying its Navier-Stokes compatibility.

Authors:  Jeremías Garay; Hernán Mella; Julio Sotelo; Cristian Cárcamo; Sergio Uribe; Cristóbal Bertoglio; Joaquín Mura
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.648

4.  General phase regularized reconstruction using phase cycling.

Authors:  Frank Ong; Joseph Y Cheng; Michael Lustig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Multipoint 5D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - accelerated cardiac- and respiratory-motion resolved mapping of mean and turbulent velocities.

Authors:  Jonas Walheim; Hannes Dillinger; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration.

Authors:  Elisabeth Neuhaus; Kilian Weiss; Rene Bastkowski; Jonas Koopmann; David Maintz; Daniel Giese
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Data Quality and Optimal Background Correction Order of Respiratory-Gated k-Space Segmented Spoiled Gradient Echo (SGRE) and Echo Planar Imaging (EPI)-Based 4D Flow MRI.

Authors:  Federica Viola; Petter Dyverfeldt; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  SRflow: Deep learning based super-resolution of 4D-flow MRI data.

Authors:  Suprosanna Shit; Judith Zimmermann; Ivan Ezhov; Johannes C Paetzold; Augusto F Sanches; Carolin Pirkl; Bjoern H Menze
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.