Literature DB >> 29159012

Robust Planning for a Patient Treated in Decubitus Position with Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Radiotherapy.

Shikui Tang1, Limin Song1, Jared D Sturgeon2, Chang Chang1.   

Abstract

A challenging case was reported for a patient treated in decubitus position with proton pencil beam scanning. A regular robust plan with the consideration of the uncertainties of translational alignment and range accuracy cannot ensure the target coverage as revealed in two verification computed tomography (CT) scans during the first week of the treatment. The irreproducibility of daily alignment and anatomical variations in such a position is mainly due to patient's roll. To mitigate the interfractional effect on the target coverage, a novel robust optimization against the patient's angular setup uncertainties was implemented to improve the plan quality by introducing two artificial CT image sets by rolling the planning CT three degrees in both clockwise and counter-clockwise directions and adding them into robust optimization scenarios, which was shown to be an effective and simple way to mitigate target dose degradation with respect to interfractional variations. This method can be easily generalized and applied to other situations where angular variations in patient's setup can introduce large dosimetric effects. It is recommended that angularly robust optimization method should be integrated into the treatment planning system as an option particularly for patient's treatment subject to large angular variations, such as the one in the decubitus position reported here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung tumors; pencil beam scanning; proton raiotherapy; robust planning

Year:  2017        PMID: 29159012      PMCID: PMC5690418          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  10 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Yupeng Li; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions.

Authors:  A J Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Radiological use of fast protons.

Authors:  R R WILSON
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1946-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  D Pflugfelder; J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy.

Authors:  Albin Fredriksson; Anders Forsgren; Björn Hårdemark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties.

Authors:  Peter C Park; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Narayan Sahoo; Adam D Melancon; Lifei Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Beam-specific planning volumes for scattered-proton lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Flampouri; B S Hoppe; R L Slopsema; Z Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.

Authors:  B Schaffner; E Pedroni
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  AAPM Task Group Report 290: Respiratory motion management for particle therapy.

Authors:  Heng Li; Lei Dong; Christoph Bert; Joe Chang; Stella Flampouri; Kyung-Wook Jee; Liyong Lin; Michael Moyers; Shinichiro Mori; Joerg Rottmann; Erik Tryggestad; Sastry Vedam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.