| Literature DB >> 29152121 |
Kuan-Yin Ko1,2,3, Yen-Wen Wu2,4,5,6,7, Cheng-Wei Liu6,8,3, Mei-Fang Cheng2,9, Ruoh-Fang Yen2, Wei-Shiung Yang4,3,10,11.
Abstract
The aim was to evaluate sequential changes of myocardial glucose utilization and LV systolic function in db/db mice. Eight db/db and eight wild-type mice underwent plasma substrate analysis and dynamic 18F-FDG PET at week 8 (W8), W10, W12, W14, and W16. 18F-FDG uptake constant Ki and the rate of myocardial glucose uptake (MRGlu) were derived via Patlak graphic analysis. Another 8 db/db and 8 wild-type mice received echocardiography at W8, W12, and W16 and LV structure and function were measured. The db/db mice showed increased weights and glucose levels as they aged. The index of homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance, insulin, and free fatty acid concentrations were higher in db/db mice compared with wild-type. MRGlu of db/db mice across all time points was markedly higher than that of wild-type. An age-dependent elevation of MRGlu was observed in db/db mice. Ki and MRGlu of db/db mice showed negative correlation with triglyceride levels. When two groups were pooled together, Ki and MRGlu were significantly proportional to glucose levels. No significant difference in LV structure and function was noted between db/db and control mice. In conclusion, we demonstrated altered myocardial glucose utilization preceding the onset of LV systolic dysfunction in db/db mice.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG); db/db mice; positron emission tomography (PET); small animal imaging; type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)
Year: 2017 PMID: 29152121 PMCID: PMC5675673 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinical characteristics, plasma substrate levels, HOMA-IR index and estimated metabolic glucose utilization using FDG PET of wild type and db/db animal models
| Mice group (n) | Weight (g) | TG (nmol/μl) | FFA (nmol/μl) | HOMA-IR | MRGlu (umol/min/100g) | Isolated Heart | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dl) | Insulin (μg/l) | Index | Max | Mean | LVW (g) (n=4/group) | HW (g) (n=4/group) | HW/BW (% (n=4/group) | ||||
| wild-type (4) | 19.99 ± 2.59 | 0.57 ± 0.15 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 98.50 ± 16.62 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 14.15 ± 5.76 | 2.43 ± 1.41 | |||
| db/db (7) | 36.17 ± 1.84* | 0.69 ± 0.23 | 4.27 ± 2.14* | 318.25 ± 54.84* | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 1.89 ± 0.07* | 79.64 ± 27.10* | 35.95 ± 19.70* | |||
| wild-type (6) | 20.85 ± 2.84 | 0.54 ± 1.68 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 120.33 ± 19.33 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 24.00 ± 7.32 | 7.25 ± 3.71 | |||
| db/db (4) | 40.25 ± 1.17*† | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 2.31 ± 2.47* | 354.75 ± 50.10* | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 2.84 ± 0.03* | 87.24 ± 25.61* | 45.12 ± 31.40* | |||
| wild-type (4) | 23.26 ± 2.42 | 1.20 ± 0.31 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 112.00 ± 38.20 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.11 | 11.03 ± 6.21 | 0.88 ± 0.43 | |||
| db/db (5) | 43.48 ± 2.47*† | 2.10 ± 0.25 | 1.47 ± 0.51* | 372.12 ± 49.25* | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 2.97 ± 0.08*† | 77.69 ± 34.88* | 19.28 ± 15.96* | |||
| wild-type (7) | 22.86 ± 2.36 | 0.81 ± 0.34 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 104.12 ± 20.53 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 12.27 ± 6.83 | 3.66 ± 1.85 | |||
| db/db (5) | 45.38 ± 2.76*† | 0.61 ± 0.23 | 2.78 ± 3.05* | 414.25 ± 49.10*† | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 2.29 ± 0.06*† | 165.80 ± 87.93*† | 76.66 ± 65.46*† | |||
| wild-type (7) | 23.09 ± 2.23 | 0.80 ± 0.28 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 93.50 ± 14.00 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 16.58 ± 5.81 | 3.63 ± 3.60 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.16‡ |
| db/db (7) | 47.03 ± 4.03*† | 0.55 ± 0.20 | 1.15 ± 0.42* | 469.75 ± 76.86*† | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 2.35 ±0.06*† | 129.13 ± 48.49*† | 71.90 ± 40.37*† | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.06 |
TG, triglyceride. FFA, free fatty acid. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance. MRGlu, rate of myocardial glucose uptake. LVW, left ventricular weight. HW, heart weight. BW, body weight.
*Significantly higher than wild-type group. †Significantly higher than baseline W8 values. ‡Significantly higher than db/db group. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics in wild type and db/db mice
| Wild-type (n) | db/db (n) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | W8 (8) | W12 (7) | W16 (7) | W8 (7) | W12 (7) | W16 (7) |
| IVS, mm | 0.68 ± 0.15 | 0.64 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.10 | 0.75 ± 0.93 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0. 06 |
| PW, mm | 0.72 ± 0.73 | 0.70 ± 0.11 | 0.63 ± 0.11 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.69 ± 0.07 | 0.70 ± 0.08 |
| EDD, mm | 3.94 ± 0.42 | 4.11 ± 0.48 | 3.88 ± 0.48 | 3.57 ± 0.52 | 3.82 ± 0.30 | 3.84 ± 0.25 |
| ESD, mm | 2.47 ± 0.58 | 2.82 ± 0.47 | 2.60 ± 0.44 | 2.51 ± 0.37 | 2.62 ± 0.27 | 2.46 ± 0.44 |
| EF, % | 74.13 ± 8.26 | 66.51 ± 7.85 | 68.18 ± 6.41 | 65.66 ± 6.34 | 67.08 ± 0.18 | 71.25 ± 9.28 |
| FS, % | 38.20 ± 8.10 | 32.25 ± 5.38 | 33.00 ± 4.70 | 31.00 ± 4.41 | 31.96 ± 3.76 | 36.18 ± 8.83 |
| 23.65 ± 2.50 | 26.45 ± 2.87 | 28.08 ± 2.82 | 39.06 ±2.74* | 45.28 ±3.02*‡ | 50.98 ±2.49*‡ | |
| LVW, g | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | ||||
| HW, g | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ±0.03 | ||||
| HW/BW (%) | 0.60 ± 0.01† | 0.31 ± 0.06 | ||||
LVW, left ventricular weight. HW, heart weight. BW, body weight. UCG, ultrasound cardiogram. IVS, interventricular septum.
PW, posterior wall, EDD, end diastolic dimension. ESD, end systolic dimension. EF, ejection fraction. FS, fractional shortening.
*Significantly higher than wild-type group.
†Significantly higher than db/db group.
‡Significantly higher than baseline W8 values.
P<0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 1Body weight (A) and blood glucose (B) of wild type and db/db mice at 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks of ages. Body weight and glucose levels in db/db demonstrated moderate age-dependent increases. Body weight, not glucose, in wild type mice increased only minimally with age. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 2Metabolic glucose utilization of the myocardium [MRGlumean (A) and MRGlumax (B)] in wild type and db/db mice at 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks of age. Significantly higher MRGlu values were observed in db/db mice as compared with age-matched controls (all P<0.05). A statistically significant trend was also seen with time. Significance values are denoted above bar plots.
Figure 3Relationships between blood glucose levels and Ki (A), MRGlumean (B), MRGlumax (C) in the myocardium. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 4Relationships between plasma triglyceride (TG) levels and Ki (A), MRGlumean (B), MRGlumax (C) in the myocardium. Ki and MRGlu were both inversely proportional to TG in db/db mice (all P<0.05).
Previous FDG PET studies of animal heart in vivo for assessment of myocardial glucose utilization
| Reference | Animal models | FDG PET | Time points | Injection route | Glucose clamp | glucose uptake/MRGlu | LV function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yue et al., 2007 [ | db/db and db/+ mice | Static | W9 | IV | Insulin tolerance test | ↓glucose uptake | Preserved EF |
| Shoghi et al., 2008 [ | Type 2 diabetic ZDF rat | Dynamic | W14, W19 | IV | No | ↓MRGlu, no difference in aging | Preserved FS |
| Ménard et al., 2010 [ | Diet-induced Type 2 diabetic rat | Dynamic | W14 | IV | Yes | ↓MRGlu | ↓EF |
| Thorn et al., 2013 [ | Type 1 diabetic STZ mice | Dynamic | Baseline, 2wk after STZ | IV | No | ↓MRGlu | No mention |
| Nemanich et al., 2013 [ | Type 2 diabetic ZDF rat | Dynamic | W14 | IV | No | ↓MRGlu | No mention |
| Abdurrachim et al., 2017 [ | db/db and db/+ mice | Static | W10 | IV | No | ↓glucose uptake | Preserved EF |
ZDF, Zucker Diabetic Fatty. STZ, streptozotocin. IV, intravenous. MRGlu, rate of myocardial glucose uptake. FS, fractional shortening. EF, ejection fraction.
↑and↓stand for increased and decreased effect, respectively.
Experimental designs
| Mice models | Experiments | Time point (age in week) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. db/db vs. wild-type (8/group) | NPOFDG PET (MRGlu)HOMA-IR, glucose, TG, FFA | 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 |
| 2. db/db vs. wild-type (8/group) | Echocardiography | 8, 12, 16 |
MRGlu, rate of myocardial glucose uptake. NPO, nil per os. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance.
TG, triglyceride. FFA, free fatty acid.
Figure 5Representative of myocardial time-activity curve together with the 18 F-FDG kinetics fitted model curve (right), and its transverse PET images in fasting mice after intraperitoneal injection of 18 F-FDG (left)
The highlighted circle and radius demonstrated the circular volume-of-interest (VOI) which has a 60° angle indicating the septum location.