Literature DB >> 29149433

Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.

Marko Zlicar1, Vesna Novak-Jankovic2, Rok Blagus3, Maurizio Cecconi4.   

Abstract

Animal studies suggest that dynamic predictors remain useful in patients with pneumoperitoneum, but human data is conflicting. Our aim was to determine predictive values of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in patients with pneumoperitoneum using LiDCORapid™ haemodynamic monitor. Standardised fluid challenges of colloid were administered to patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, one fluid challenge per patient. Intra-abdominal pressure was automatically held at 12 mmHg. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in nominal stroke index (nSI) ≥ 10%. Linear regression was used to assess the ability of PPV and SVV to track the changes of nSI and logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the predictive value of PPV and SVV for fluid responsiveness. Threshold values for PPV and SVV were obtained using the "gray zone" approach. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 56 patients were included in analysis. 41 patients (73%) responded to fluids. Both PPV and SVV tracked changes in nSI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.34 for PPV and 0.53 for SVV). Odds ratio for fluid responsiveness for PPV was 1.163 (95% CI 1.01-1.34) and for SVV 1.341 (95% CI 1.10-1.63). PPV achieved an AUROC of 0.674 (95% CI 0.518-0.830) and SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.668-0.932). The gray zone of PPV ranged between 6.5 and 20.5% and that of SVV between 7.5 and 13%. During pneumoperitoneum, as measured by LiDCORapid™, PPV and SVV can predict fluid responsiveness, however their sensitivity is lower than the one reported in conditions without pneumoperitoneum. Trial registry number: (with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12612000456853.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic predictors; Fluid responsiveness; Haemodynamics; Pneumoperitoneum

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29149433     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0081-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  53 in total

1.  Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  L Ø Høiseth; I E Hoff; K Myre; S A Landsverk; K A Kirkebøen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Goal-directed therapy in the operating room: is there any benefit?

Authors:  Jason B O'Neal; Andrew D Shaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Ability of pulse power, esophageal Doppler, and arterial pulse pressure to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume in humans.

Authors:  José Marquez; Kenneth McCurry; Donald A Severyn; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care.

Authors:  John A Myburgh; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Alan Cass; David Gattas; Parisa Glass; Jeffrey Lipman; Bette Liu; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Colman B Taylor; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively.

Authors:  D Lahner; B Kabon; C Marschalek; A Chiari; G Pestel; A Kaider; E Fleischmann; H Hetz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Sami Alaya; Véronique Zarka; Mabrouk Bahloul; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; David A Harrison; Neil MacDonald; Michael A Gillies; Mark Blunt; Gareth Ackland; Michael P W Grocott; Aoife Ahern; Kathryn Griggs; Rachael Scott; Charles Hinds; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pulse pressure variation shows a direct linear correlation with tidal volume in anesthetized healthy patients.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Jing-Sheng Lou; Wei-Dong Mi; Wei-Xiu Yuan; Qiang Fu; Min Wang; Jing Qu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  5 in total

1.  Application of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in early enteral nutrition after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Liqiang Du; Yuanyuan Zhao; Changheng Yin; Shuhong Liu; Zhaobo Cui; Min Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.

Authors:  Yun'an Song; Huiyan Hou; Jie Bai; Hongbin Gu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Anesthetic Challenges and Perioperative Factors Affecting Delayed Graft Function in Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplant: A Review of a Single-Center Experience of 100 Cases.

Authors:  Nisha Rajmohan; Shilpa Omkarappa; Sangeeth P Srinivasan; Suresh G Nair; Rajesh Rajgopal; Nidhin Eldo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation using a finger-cuff method in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Roman Schumann; Phillip Hoppe; Iwona Bonney; Wilbert Wesselink; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.977

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.