| Literature DB >> 29147412 |
Mu-Tai Liu1,2,3,4, Mu-Kuan Chen4,5, Chia-Chun Huang1, Chao-Yuan Huang2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of molecular biomarkers which could provide information for more accurate prognostication and development of novel therapeutic strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). NPC is a unique malignant epithelial carcinoma of head and neck region, with an intimate association with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Currently, the prediction of NPC prognosis is mainly based on the clinical TNM staging; however, NPC patients with the same clinical stage often present different clinical outcomes, suggesting that the TNM stage is insufficient to precisely predict the prognosis of this disease. In this review, we give an overview of the prognostic value of molecular markers in NPC and discuss potential strategies of targeted therapies for treatment of NPC. Molecular biomarkers, which play roles in abnormal proliferation signaling pathways (such as Wnt/β-catenin pathway), intracellular mitogenic signal aberration (such as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α), receptor-mediated aberrations (such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), tumor suppressors (such as p16 and p27 activity), cell cycle aberrations (such as cyclin D1 and cyclin E), cell adhesion aberrations (such as E-cadherin), apoptosis dysregualtion (such as survivin) and centromere aberration (centromere protein H), are prognostic markers for NPC. Plasma EBV DNA concentrations and EBV-encoded latent membrane proteins are also prognostic markers for NPC. Implication of molecular targeted therapies in NPC was discussed. Such therapies could have potential in combination with different cytotoxic agents to combat and eradicate tumor cells. In order to further improve overall survival for patients with loco-regionally advanced NPC, the development of innovative strategies, including prognostic molecular markers and molecular targeted agents is needed.Entities:
Keywords: Molecular marker; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Targeted therapy
Year: 2015 PMID: 29147412 PMCID: PMC5649942 DOI: 10.14740/wjon610w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Oncol ISSN: 1920-4531
Figure 1Overview of the signaling pathways involved in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) development. Initiation of upstream signaling proteins in the NPC development begins with LMP1. Subsequent induced activity of downstream proteins in several pathways such as β-catenin, NF-κB, and AP-1 leads to dysregulation of cell proliferation (CDK/cyclin protein), increase in angiogenesis (VEGF, IL-8), metastasis (E-cadherin, MMPs), cell transformation (TERT), and inhibition of apoptosis (survivin, Bcl-2). ——►: stimulatory effect; ——●: inhibitory effect; AP-1: activator protein 1; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK: extracellular signal related kinase; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase; LMP1: latent membrane protein 1; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; PI3K: phosphoinositol-3-kinase; RASSF: Ras association domain family; TERT: telomerase reverse transcriptase; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; WIF: Wnt inhibitory factor.
Molecular Pathways and Targeted Therapeutic Agents Involved in Nasopharyngeal Cancer
| Mechanism | Pathway | Targeted therapeutic agent or strategy | Clinical application | In development |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal signaling pathways | EGFR | Cetuximab: anti-EGFR antibody | + | |
| PI3K/AKT and PTEN | PI3K inhibitor: Y294002 | + | ||
| RKIP | RKIP: alter radiosensitivity | + | ||
| RASSF | Demethylation of RASSF2A | + | ||
| Wnt/β-catenin | YC-1: anti-invasion activity | + | ||
| Receptor-mediated aberration | VEGF | Bevacizumab: monoclonal antibody against VEGF | + | |
| c-MET | c-MET inhibitor: SU11274, BAY 853474, PF-04217903 | + | ||
| Intra-cellular mitogenic signals aberration | HIF-1α | HIF-1α inhibitor: NSC-134754, pantoprazole | + | |
| Cell cycle aberration | Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), cyclin D1, E | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor: seliciclib | + | |
| c-Myc | c-Myc inhibitor | + | ||
| MicroRNAs | miRNAs of let-7 family: suppress cell proliferation | + | ||
| Cell adhesion aberration | E-cadherin | DNA demethylating agent: 5-aza-dC | + | |
| Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) | Synthetic inhibitors: marimastat, tanomastat (BAY12-9666), prinomastat (AG3340) | + | ||
| Recombinant human endostatin: endosatr | + | |||
| Off-target inhibitors: bisphosphonates | + | |||
| Natural inhibitors: neovastat (AE-941) | + |
Clinical Trials of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Cancer
| Agent | Phase | Treatment | Number of patients | ORR (%) | CR (%) | SD (%) | TTP (mo) | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single or combination therapy in metastatic/recurrent disease | ||||||||||
| Cetuximab | II | Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly (400 mg/m2 loading dose) + carboplatin | 60 | 11.7 | 0 | 48.3 | 2.7 | - | 7.8 | Chan et al, 2005 [ |
| Gefitinib | II | Gefitinib 250 mg daily | 19 | 0 | 0 | 10.5 | 4 | - | 16 | Chua et al, 2008 [ |
| Gefitinib | II | Gefitinib 500 mg daily | 16 (15 evaluable) | 0 | 0 | 18.8 | 2.7 | - | 12 | Ma et al, 2008 [ |
| Single or concurrent therapy in locally advanced disease | ||||||||||
| Seliciclib | I | 800 mg or 400 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3 and 8 to 12 | 20 (14 evaluable) | 0 | 0 | Seven patients had > 25% reduction of tumor size | - | - | - | Hsieh et al, 2009 [ |
| Cetuximab | II | An initial dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m2) 7 - 10 days before receiving concurrent IMRT, weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2/week) and cetuximab (250 mg/m2/week) | 30 | 96 | 90 | - | - | 2-year PFS 86.5% | 2-year OS 89.9% | Ma et al, 2012 [ |
| Bevacizumab | II | Three cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) both given on days 1, 22, and 43 of IMRT, then received three cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2), both given on days 64, 85, and 106 after IMRT, and three cycles of fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2/day), given on days 64 - 67, 85 - 88, and 106 - 109 after IMRT | 46 (44 evaluable) | 91 | - | - | - | 2-year PFS 74.7% | 2-year OS 90.9% | Lee et al, 2012 [ |
ORR: overall response rate; CR: complete response; SD: stable disease; SD: stable disease; TTP (mo): time to progression (month); PFS (mo): progression-free survival (month); OS (mo): overall survival (month).