PURPOSE: Cell cycle dysregulation resulting in expression of antiapoptotic genes and uncontrolled proliferation is a feature of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The pharmacodynamic effects of seliciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, were studied in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma received seliciclib at 800 mg or 400 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3 and 8 to 12. Paired tumor samples obtained at baseline and on day 13 were assessed by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transcriptional profiling using real-time PCR low-density array consisting of a panel of 380 genes related to cell cycle inhibition, apoptosis, signal transduction, and cell proliferation. RESULTS: At 800 mg bd, one patient experienced grade 3 liver toxicity and another had grade 2 vomiting; no significant toxicities were experienced in 13 patients treated at 400 mg bd. Seven of fourteen evaluable patients had clinical evidence of tumor reduction. Some of these responses were associated with increased tumor apoptosis, necrosis, and decreases in plasma EBV DNA posttreatment. Reduced protein expression of Mcl-1, cyclin D1, phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein pRB (T821), and significant transcriptional down-regulation of genes related to cellular proliferation and survival were shown in some patients posttreatment, indicative of cell cycle modulation by seliciclib, more specifically inhibition of cdk2/cyclin E, cdk7/cyclin H, and cdk9/cyclin T. CONCLUSIONS: Brief treatment with this regimen of seliciclib in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma is tolerable at 400 mg bd and associated with tumor pharmacodynamic changes consistent with cdk inhibition, and warrants further efficacy studies in this tumor.
PURPOSE: Cell cycle dysregulation resulting in expression of antiapoptotic genes and uncontrolled proliferation is a feature of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The pharmacodynamic effects of seliciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, were studied in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma received seliciclib at 800 mg or 400 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3 and 8 to 12. Paired tumor samples obtained at baseline and on day 13 were assessed by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transcriptional profiling using real-time PCR low-density array consisting of a panel of 380 genes related to cell cycle inhibition, apoptosis, signal transduction, and cell proliferation. RESULTS: At 800 mg bd, one patient experienced grade 3 liver toxicity and another had grade 2 vomiting; no significant toxicities were experienced in 13 patients treated at 400 mg bd. Seven of fourteen evaluable patients had clinical evidence of tumor reduction. Some of these responses were associated with increased tumor apoptosis, necrosis, and decreases in plasma EBV DNA posttreatment. Reduced protein expression of Mcl-1, cyclin D1, phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein pRB (T821), and significant transcriptional down-regulation of genes related to cellular proliferation and survival were shown in some patients posttreatment, indicative of cell cycle modulation by seliciclib, more specifically inhibition of cdk2/cyclin E, cdk7/cyclin H, and cdk9/cyclin T. CONCLUSIONS: Brief treatment with this regimen of seliciclib in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma is tolerable at 400 mg bd and associated with tumor pharmacodynamic changes consistent with cdk inhibition, and warrants further efficacy studies in this tumor.
Authors: C Norez; C Vandebrouck; J Bertrand; S Noel; E Durieu; N Oumata; H Galons; F Antigny; A Chatelier; P Bois; L Meijer; F Becq Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Christine K Cheng; W Clay Gustafson; Elizabeth Charron; Benjamin T Houseman; Eli Zunder; Andrei Goga; Nathanael S Gray; Brian Pollok; Scott A Oakes; C David James; Kevan M Shokat; William A Weiss; Qi-Wen Fan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C Delehouzé; K Godl; N Loaëc; C Bruyère; N Desban; N Oumata; H Galons; T I Roumeliotis; E G Giannopoulou; J Grenet; D Twitchell; J Lahti; N Mouchet; M-D Galibert; S D Garbis; L Meijer Journal: Oncogene Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Angela Nanos-Webb; Natalie A Jabbour; Asha S Multani; Hannah Wingate; Nassima Oumata; Hervé Galons; Benoît Joseph; Laurent Meijer; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Arie J Hoogendijk; Joris J T H Roelofs; Janwillem Duitman; Miriam H P van Lieshout; Dana C Blok; Tom van der Poll; Catharina W Wieland Journal: Mol Med Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Nina Berberich; Bernd Uhl; Jos Joore; Ulrike K Schmerwitz; Bettina A Mayer; Christoph A Reichel; Fritz Krombach; Stefan Zahler; Angelika M Vollmar; Robert Fürst Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 8.739