Literature DB >> 16737616

[Significance of EGFR and p-ERK expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

Shu-sen Wang1, Zhong-zhen Guan, Yan-qun Xiang, Bo Wang, Tong-yu Lin, Wen-qi Jiang, Li Zhang, Hui-zhong Zhang, Jing-hui Hou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To detect the expression of EGFR and p-ERK in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and investigate their clinical significance.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry LSAB method was adopted to detect the expression of EGFR and p-ERK. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software package (10.0) to correlate their expression with clinical characteristics and prognosis.
RESULTS: Positive staining for EGFR was observed in 39 of 55 cases (70.9%). The EGFR expression was correlated with clinical stage and gender. EGFR expression was correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) and shorter time to progression (TTP). Positive staining for p-ERK was observed in 29 of 55 cases (52.7%). There was a statistically significant association between positive p-ERK expression and advanced clinical stage. Positive p-ERK expression was correlated with poorer OS, disease-free survival (DFS) and TTP. EGFR expression was correlated with the expression of p-ERK. On multivariate analysis, age over 50 years was an independent poor prognostic factor for NPC. Both EGFR and p-ERK were not independent prognostic factors for NPC.
CONCLUSION: Expressions of EGFR and p-ERK are detected in NPC. Their abnormally high expression signifies poor prognosis in NPC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16737616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi        ISSN: 0253-3766


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma--review of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Josephine Chou; Yu-Ching Lin; Jae Kim; Liang You; Zhidong Xu; Biao He; David M Jablons
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Quantitative study of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immunotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wang Shengjun; Guo Yunbo; Song Liyan; Li Jinming; Deng Qinkai
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.432

3.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma signaling pathway: an update on molecular biomarkers.

Authors:  Warut Tulalamba; Tavan Janvilisri
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-03-05

Review 4.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: molecular biomarker discovery and progress.

Authors:  William Chi-Shing Cho
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  Oncogene mutational profile in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zi-Chen Zhang; Sha Fu; Fang Wang; Hai-Yun Wang; Yi-Xin Zeng; Jian-Yong Shao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Prognostic Value of Molecular Markers and Implication for Molecular Targeted Therapies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Update in an Era of New Targeted Molecules Development.

Authors:  Mu-Tai Liu; Mu-Kuan Chen; Chia-Chun Huang; Chao-Yuan Huang
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2015-02-14

7.  Inhibition of cell proliferation and radioresistance by miR-383-5p through targeting RNA binding protein motif (RBM3) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui Ma; Peng Gao; Hua Yang; Jing Hu; Jing-Jing Xiao; Mei Shi; Li-Na Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

8.  Prognostic Role of EGFR/p-EGFR in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xishan Chen; Renba Liang; Lin Lai; Kaihua Chen; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Prognostic value of EGFR and p-EGFR in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohua Hong; Guangyao Wang; Guanglan Xu; Wei Shi; Tongbiao Wang; Zhen Rong; Chunmei Mo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.