Literature DB >> 29143331

Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments.

James P Marcin1, Patrick S Romano1,2, Madan Dharmar1, James M Chamberlain3, Nanette Dudley4, Charles G Macias5, Lise E Nigrovic6, Elizabeth C Powell7, Alexander J Rogers8, Meridith Sonnett9, Leah Tzimenatos10, Elizabeth R Alpern11, Rebecca Andrews-Dickert12, Dominic A Borgialli13, Erika Sidney14, Charlie Casper15, Jonathan Michael Dean15, Nathan Kuppermann1,10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consistency, reliability, and validity of an implicit review instrument that measures the quality of care provided to children in the emergency department (ED). DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Medical records of randomly selected children from 12 EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). STUDY
DESIGN: Eight pediatric emergency medicine physicians applied the instrument to 620 medical records. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We determined internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We evaluated the validity of the instrument by correlating scores with four condition-specific explicit review instruments. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Individual reviewers' Cronbach's alpha had a mean of 0.85 with a range of 0.76-0.97; overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.90. The ICC was 0.49 for the summary score with a range from 0.40 to 0.46. Correlations between the quality of care score and the four condition-specific explicit review scores ranged from 0.24 to 0.38.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care instrument demonstrated good internal consistency, moderate inter-rater reliability, high inter-rater agreement, and evidence supporting validity. The instrument could be useful for systems' assessment and research in evaluating the care delivered to children in the ED. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatrics; emergency department; quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29143331      PMCID: PMC5980311          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986.

Authors:  L V Rubenstein; K L Kahn; E J Reinisch; M J Sherwood; W H Rogers; C Kamberg; D Draper; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The reliability of peer assessments. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R L Goldman
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Measuring hospital quality using pediatric readmission and revisit rates.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Eric Vittinghoff; Renée Asteria-Peñaloza; Jeffrey D Edwards; Jinoos Yazdany; Henry C Lee; W John Boscardin; Michael D Cabana; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.

Authors:  M A Smith; A J Atherly; R L Kane; J T Pacala
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

Authors:  K L Kahn; W H Rogers; L V Rubenstein; M J Sherwood; E J Reinisch; E B Keeler; D Draper; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Quality of care of children in the emergency department: association with hospital setting and physician training.

Authors:  Madan Dharmar; James P Marcin; Patrick S Romano; Emily R Andrada; Frank Overly; Jonathan H Valente; Danielle J Harvey; Stacey L Cole; Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 8.  Advancing children's health care and outcomes through the pediatric quality measures program.

Authors:  Kamila B Mistry; Francis Chesley; Karen LLanos; Denise Dougherty
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

9.  Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.

Authors:  P E Dans; J P Weiner; S E Otter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  2 in total

1.  Removing anonymity protection and utilization review decisions: a real-world case under a single-payer health system.

Authors:  Chih-Kuang Wang; Shih-Jung Chien; Po-Chang Lee; Shou-Hsia Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Using an artificial neural network to predict traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Andrew T Hale; David P Stonko; Jaims Lim; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Chevis N Shannon; Mayur B Patel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.