OBJECTIVE: To assess variation among hospitals on pediatric readmission and revisit rates and to determine the number of high- and low-performing hospitals. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis using the State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project with revisit linkages available, we identified pediatric (ages 1-20 years) visits with 1 of 7 common inpatient pediatric conditions (asthma, dehydration, pneumonia, appendicitis, skin infections, mood disorders, and epilepsy). For each condition, we calculated rates of all-cause readmissions and rates of revisits (readmission or presentation to the emergency department) within 30 and 60 days of discharge. We used mixed logistic models to estimate hospital-level risk-standardized 30-day revisit rates and to identify hospitals that had performance statistically different from the group mean. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission rates were low (<10.0%) for all conditions. Thirty-day rates of revisit to the inpatient or emergency department setting ranged from 6.2% (appendicitis) to 11.0% (mood disorders). Study hospitals (n = 958) had low condition-specific visit volumes (37.0%-82.8% of hospitals had <25 visits). The only condition with >1% of hospitals labeled as different from the mean on 30-day risk-standardized revisit rates was mood disorders (4.2% of hospitals [n = 15], range of hospital performance 6.3%-15.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that when comparing hospitals' performances to the average, few hospitals that care for children are identified as high- or low-performers for revisits, even for common pediatric diagnoses, likely due to low hospital volumes. This limits the usefulness of condition-specific readmission or revisit measures in pediatric quality measurement.
OBJECTIVE: To assess variation among hospitals on pediatric readmission and revisit rates and to determine the number of high- and low-performing hospitals. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis using the State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project with revisit linkages available, we identified pediatric (ages 1-20 years) visits with 1 of 7 common inpatient pediatric conditions (asthma, dehydration, pneumonia, appendicitis, skin infections, mood disorders, and epilepsy). For each condition, we calculated rates of all-cause readmissions and rates of revisits (readmission or presentation to the emergency department) within 30 and 60 days of discharge. We used mixed logistic models to estimate hospital-level risk-standardized 30-day revisit rates and to identify hospitals that had performance statistically different from the group mean. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission rates were low (<10.0%) for all conditions. Thirty-day rates of revisit to the inpatient or emergency department setting ranged from 6.2% (appendicitis) to 11.0% (mood disorders). Study hospitals (n = 958) had low condition-specific visit volumes (37.0%-82.8% of hospitals had <25 visits). The only condition with >1% of hospitals labeled as different from the mean on 30-day risk-standardized revisit rates was mood disorders (4.2% of hospitals [n = 15], range of hospital performance 6.3%-15.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that when comparing hospitals' performances to the average, few hospitals that care for children are identified as high- or low-performers for revisits, even for common pediatric diagnoses, likely due to low hospital volumes. This limits the usefulness of condition-specific readmission or revisit measures in pediatric quality measurement.
Entities:
Keywords:
child health research; delivery of care; health policy; hospital performance variation; quality measurement; readmission rates
Authors: Mark I Neuman; Matt Hall; Adam L Hersh; Thomas V Brogan; Kavita Parikh; Jason G Newland; Anne J Blaschke; Derek J Williams; Carlos G Grijalva; Amy Tyler; Samir S Shah Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Scott A Lorch; Michael Baiocchi; Jeffrey H Silber; Orit Even-Shoshan; Gabriel J Escobar; Dylan S Small Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jay G Berry; Sara L Toomey; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ashish K Jha; Mari M Nakamura; David J Klein; Jeremy Y Feng; Shanna Shulman; Vincent W Chiang; Vincent K Chiang; William Kaplan; Matt Hall; Mark A Schuster Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Chris Feudtner; James E Levin; Rajendu Srivastava; Denise M Goodman; Anthony D Slonim; Vidya Sharma; Samir S Shah; Susmita Pati; Crayton Fargason; Matt Hall Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Katherine A Auger; Tamara D Simon; David Cooperberg; James Gay; Dennis Z Kuo; Michele Saysana; Christopher J Stille; Erin Stucky Fisher; Sowdhamini Wallace; Jay Berry; Daniel Coghlin; Vishu Jhaveri; Steven Kairys; Tina Logsdon; Ulfat Shaikh; Rajendu Srivastava; Amy J Starmer; Victoria Wilkins; Mark W Shen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jay G Berry; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sara L Toomey; Alyna T Chien; Jisun Jang; Maria C Bryant; David J Klein; William J Kaplan; Mark A Schuster Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: James P Marcin; Patrick S Romano; Madan Dharmar; James M Chamberlain; Nanette Dudley; Charles G Macias; Lise E Nigrovic; Elizabeth C Powell; Alexander J Rogers; Meridith Sonnett; Leah Tzimenatos; Elizabeth R Alpern; Rebecca Andrews-Dickert; Dominic A Borgialli; Erika Sidney; Charlie Casper; Jonathan Michael Dean; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Stephanie Doupnik; Jonathan Rodean; Bonnie T Zima; Tumaini R Coker; Diana Worsley; Kris P Rehm; James C Gay; Matt Hall; Steve Marcus Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Katherine A Auger; Samir S Shah; Bin Huang; Patrick W Brady; Steven H Weinberg; Elyse Reamer; Kevin S Tanager; Katelin Zahn; Matthew M Davis Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.960