Literature DB >> 29137077

Quality of life and complications at the different stages of bone transport for treatment infected nonunion of the tibia.

Hu Wang1, Xing Wei, Ping Liu, Ya-Hui Fu, Peng-Fei Wang, Yu-Xuan Cong, Bin-Fei Zhang, Zhong Li, Jin-Lai Lei, Kun Zhang, Yan Zhuang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Mos 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, and the virtual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain during the treatment period and the complication rate associated with infected nonunion of the tibia managed surgically by bone transport.This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a consecutive patient cohort. Patients suffering from infected nonunion of the tibia were treated by bone transport from 2012 to 2014. Follow-up was for at least 2 years after complete osseous consolidation. Standardized treatment included bacterial eradication by segmental resection, bone transport using Ilizarov apparatus, and docking maneuver. The main outcome measurements consisted of the quality of life (PCS and MCS scores) and the VAS of pain during the different stages of therapy. In addition, all complications were documented.Our series comprised 12 men and 3 women with an average age of 36.9 years (range: 20-55 years). All patients previously undergone an average of 2.9 operations (range: 1-6 operations). In all patients, bone defects were present with a mean size of 7.5 cm (range: 3-12 cm), and all patients were suffering from soft tissue defects (range: 5-17 cm). The mean external fixator time (EFT) was 48 weeks (range: 30-62 weeks) and the mean external fixation index was 43.1 days/cm (range: 33-62 days/cm). All patients achieved bone union, and no recurrence of infection was observed. According to the Paley classification, patients suffered 15 minor and 13 major complications. The average complication rate per patient comprised of 1.0 minor and 0.9 major complications. Bone grafting was required in 6 cases at the docking site. One patient suffered from equinus deformity, and refused any further surgical procedures. We performed 28 operations in 15 patients (average 1.9 operations per patient). After the period of bone transport, PCS and MCS scores increased continuously. After completed consolidation, the average MCS score was comparable to a normal collective, and the average VAS score was 1.87 (range: 0-3).Bone transport is a safe option for the treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia despite the high complication rate. The arduous and demanding nature of this treatment subjects patient to considerable the pain, mental, and physical stress. The average VAS scores, PCS, and MCS scores significantly improve at final follow-up. It is essential to communicate this fact to the patients and their relatives before the application of the frame in order to increase their compliance with the long and emotionally draining treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29137077      PMCID: PMC5690770          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Infected nonunion of the tibia is usually associated with deformity, bone loss, persistent infection at the fracture site, and severe adverse effects on health-related quality of life.[ This is a challenge for orthopedic surgeons and patients. Several surgical treatment options have been proposed. The Ilizarov method can overcome all associated problems simultaneously; therefore, it has evolved to become the main treatment for infected nonunion. Although lots of studies showed high rates of successful with surgical treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia by bone transport,[ but the pain, long treatment process, and prolonged external fixation are considered to be the main and unavoidable shortcomings[; this results in a significant physical and mental burden for the patient. The previous studies[ mainly evaluated the physiological outcomes at final follow-up, whereas psychological burdens and pain did not receive enough investigation at final follow-up and during the long treatment process. The treatment strategy of distraction osteogenesis consists of 4 distinctive phases of treatment, including bacterial eradication, bone transport following construction of the Ilizarov apparatus and corticotomy, docking maneuver with osseous consolidation, and patients’ rehabilitation after removal of the construct. This study reviewed outcomes of 15 patients who underwent bone transport for infected nonunion of the tibia. We evaluated external fixation time, external fixation index, and complications from chart review. In addition, it was our goal to assess Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS) of SF-36 score, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of for pain measurement during the different treatment periods. We also analyzed the complication rate associated with this technique.

Patients and methods

Patients

We performed a retrospective analysis of data in a consecutive patient series with infected nonunion of the tibia. All patients underwent bone transport from 2012 to 2014. The inclusion criterion for this study was a patient with infected nonunion of the tibia. Other inclusion criteria comprised at least one positive microbiological culture from an intraoperative tissue specimen, requirement to perform bone transport with bone defects of at least 3 cm, angiography without signs of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, normal sensory and motor function, and the absence of nicotine abuse. Patients suffering from intraarticular fractures and fractures with vascular compromise, age > 65 years, pathological fractures, and any medical or skeletal illness affecting bone healing were excluded. Demographic data, hospitalization, and procedure details were recorded (Table 1), and follow-up was for at least 2 years after complete osseous consolidation.
Table 1

Clinical data from 15 patients.

Clinical data from 15 patients. Bone loss was located in the middle third of the diaphysis (7 cases) and at the distal diaphyseal-metaphyseal level (8 of 15 cases). Eight patients (53%) suffered an open fracture classified according to Gustilo et al,[ including 6 Type II cases and 2 Type III cases. A total of 3 fractures were initially stabilized using external fixation, 8 using plate osteosynthesis and 4 by intramedullary nailing.

Surgical technique

In cases of infected nonunion, the devitalized bone was transversely resected at the limit of apparently healthy bleeding bone. The infected scarred soft tissues and sinus tracts were debrided adequately. In order to ascertain the vitality of the residual bone, we drilled several holes into the bone ends and observed bleeding with the tourniquet deflated. The bone transport segment end was cut till coverage of skin was possible so that bone transport segment was covered by soft tissue and skin during distraction. In all cases, 3 swab samples were taken for culture during surgery. Bacterial species grown in culture are summarized in Table 1. All patients received a course of antibiotics for at least 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively according to sensitivity tests. After debridement, we conducted bone transport with the circular external fixator. The assembly comprised of 6 rings: 2 proximal rings, 1 for transport, 2 distal, and 1 ring at the foot for preventing foot drop. Two Kirschner wires were inserted and tensioned for each of the rings. The site of the corticotomy was made at the proximal metaphysis. The osteotomy was performed with a Gigli saw after the fixator was applied. For coverage of the soft-tissue defects, we applied the vacuum-assisted closure device. After reaching the docking site, moving the ring continued for 3 or 4 days to compress the bone at this site. If progress to union was not observed 3 months after docking or if malalignment was evident at the docking site, the treatment was changed to radical surgical debridement. If small residual gaps were seen between the 2 bone ends, we removed cancellous bone from the ipsilateral iliac crest and grafted the docking site. In 3 cases, due to lack of consolidation and ossification of the regenerate column, we replaced the fixator with an intramedullary nail. The frame was dynamized before removal in order to assess the mechanical stability of the regenerated bone. When radiographs showed solid docking-site union and the regenerate area had a minimum of 3 complete cortices, the Ilizarov external fixator was removed. After frame removal, a functional brace (patellar tendon bearing) was applied for at least 4 weeks, and we encouraged full weight bearing to protect the bone. In the postoperative period, joint motion and partial weight bearing mobilization with crutches or walker was encouraged depending on patient's compliance and status of pain. Bone transport was commenced 5 days after osteotomy at an average rate of 1/4 mm every 6 hours. Radiologic assessment of the alignment was undertaken to ensure adequate docking. If necessary, the frame was adjusted under anesthesia to correct malalignment. Patients were kept hospitalized in the first week postoperative to facilitate training about wound and frame care and to learn how to make gradual lengthening of the distraction rod in the Ilizarov frame.

Data collection

Radiographs were obtained every 2 weeks during the distraction period and monthly during the consolidation period. External fixation time, external fixation index, and the number of operations were all recorded. The external fixation index was calculated as the number of days the fixator was in situ divided by the distance of bone transported in centimeters. All complications that occurred between the application of the frame and the final follow-up were registered. According to the Paley[ classification, complications were grouped as minor, major without residual sequelae, and major with residual sequelae. Minor complications generally required nonoperative treatment or a minor operative procedure that did not have an impact on the final result. Major complication without residual sequelae generally involved a more complex operative procedure that corrected the problem. We divided the treatment process into 4 stages: stage I (preoperative phase), stage II (bone transport until the gap disappeared), stage III (docking maneuver until removal of external fixation), and stage IV (follow-up until 2 years after removal of external fixation). Functional results were evaluated according to PCS, MCS of SF-36 score, and the VAS for pain was obtained.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics were conducted for all variables. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation. Friedman test was used to examine mean differences in PCS, MCS, and the VAS scores of pain during the different stages of therapy. Statistically significant difference was defined as P value of < .05.

Results

Our series comprised 12 men and 3 women with an average age of 36.9 years (range: 20–55 years). Patients had previously undergone an average of 2.9 operations (range: 1–6 operations). Bone defect was present in all patients. The mean distance of the bone defect after resection measured 7.5 cm (range: 3–12 cm), and all patients suffered from soft tissue defects (range: 5–17 cm2). The mean EFT was 48 weeks (range: 30–62 weeks) and the mean external fixation index was 43.1 days/cm (range: 33–62 days/cm). All patients achieved bone union, and we observed neither a neurovascular complication nor a recurrence of infection. According to the Paley classification, patients suffered 15 minor and 13 major complications (Table 2). The average complication rate per patient consisted of 1.0 minor and 0.9 major complications. One patient with sequela suffered from equinus deformity, and refused any further surgical procedures. Pin tract infection and loosening of pins were the most commonly observed complications. Pin tract infections occurred in 6 patients and were successfully treated by local care and administration of oral antibiotics.
Table 2

Complications and sequela.

Complications and sequela. Docking site united primarily (Fig. 1) in 5 cases (33%) and the most frequently encountered complication was failure of the tibial docking site to consolidate (10 cases). Bone grafting was required in 6 cases at the docking site and external fixation pressure in 1 case. We noted lack of maturation of the bone of the regenerate column in 3 patients, and we replaced the fixator with an intramedullary nail.
Figure 1

(A, B) X-rays show this patient with infected nounion after treatment by monorail external fixator. (C, D) After reaching docking site and ossification of the regenerate column, and the clinical view of the circular external fixator. (E, F) At the final follow-up, docking site union and correct alignment of the tibia. (G) The clinical view of the lower extremity at 2 years after external fixator removal.

(A, B) X-rays show this patient with infected nounion after treatment by monorail external fixator. (C, D) After reaching docking site and ossification of the regenerate column, and the clinical view of the circular external fixator. (E, F) At the final follow-up, docking site union and correct alignment of the tibia. (G) The clinical view of the lower extremity at 2 years after external fixator removal. The follow-up rate was 100% until 2 years after external fixator removal. The combined physical and mental component scores were 13.8 ± 4.0 and 37.5 ± 4.5, respectively, during the distraction period. After the period of bone transport, PCS and MCS scores increased continuously. When consolidation was completed, the MCS of the SF-36 at final follow-up was 72.5 ± 5.5 and therefore higher than during the distraction period (T = 24.145, P = .000) (Table 3). We observed a mean PCS of 13.8 ± 4.0 during the distraction period and mean PCS increased to 44.1 ± 5.3 at the final examination (T = 20.247, P = .000). All the patients had a feeling of pain during the distraction period, and the average VAS scores was 6.1 (range: 5–8), but they were able to tolerate pain with the administration of oral analgesics. This significantly improved to 1.9 (range: 0–3) at the final follow-up (T = 11.039, P = .000).
Table 3

MCS, PCS, and VAS scores.

MCS, PCS, and VAS scores.

Discussion

The treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia is challenging. Bone transport is an alternative option[; it has the following advantages: this is a minimally invasive surgical technique that can correct deformities and shortening at the same process, even with poor soft tissue coverage. There are many published papers describing outcomes and complications of bone transport treatment for long bone defects,[ but the pain, long treatment process, and prolonged external fixation are considered to be the main and unavoidable shortcomings[; this results in a significant physical and mental burden for the patient. The previous studies[ mainly evaluated the physiological outcomes at final follow-up, whereas psychological burdens and pain did not receive enough investigation at final follow-up and during the long treatment process. The purpose of this work was to assess PCS, MCS of SF-36 score, and the VAS of pain during the different treatment period and the complication rate associated with this technique. The majority of patients had suffered from complications during the long treatment period. The average complication rate per patient consisted of 1.0 minor and 0.9 major complications. Yu et al[ conducted a systematic review of tibia bone defect treated by Ilizarov method between January 1995 and April 2013; their results showed that the mean number of complications per patient was 1.47, the mean external fixation index was 1.46 months/cm, and the mean size of bone defect was 6.01 cm. In our study, the mean external fixation index was 1.43 months/cm, and the complications was 1.9 per patient; this was quite similar with the results by Paley and Maar[; their study consisted of 19 patients, the result showed 22 minor and 19 major complications, and the complications were 2.2 per patient. Our results showed an obviously higher complication rate when compared with previous literature,[ whereas all of patients in this study suffered tibial infected nonunion, experienced with multiple previous treatment failures, even in the presence of poor soft tissue coverage; this was an obvious difference from aforementioned studies. Pin-track infection was the most frequently observed complication in the course of bone transport in previous reports,[ and this complication was also noted frequently in our study without a negative impact on the final outcome. In the study by Paley and Maar,[ cases of tibial nonunion were treated with Ilizarov fixators, which resulted in that persistent infection in 3 cases (10.7%). Spiegl et al[ investigated the complication rate associated with distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of chronic tibial osteitis. Their results showed that infectious recurrences were detected in 7 cases (28%). In our study, all patients achieved bone union, and no recurrence of infection was observed. All required excision of a segment of bone with a mean length of 7.5 cm, which was then regrown from regions of good vascularity. It is possible that such radical treatment excised some bone unnecessarily, but we had no failures and consider that the risk was justified. There is a controversial view on regular bone grafting at the docking site.[ Most authors currently recommend routine staged docking site revisions during bone transport.[ We applied bone grafting at the docking site in 9 of 15 patients. This is similar to the results published by Tetsworth et al.[ The patient group of Paley and Maar[ consisted of 19 patients, and docking site union was achieved without open resection of scar tissue and osteosynthesis in the majority of patients. In addition, data by Krappinger et al[ showed that patients with multiple surgical interventions showed a significant lower satisfaction. It is therefore crucial to perform a thorough debridement of the bone to decrease the number of staged surgical docking site procedures. We perform routine docking site revision with bone grafting only when axial deviations occurred. In order to provide the greatest opportunity for the most reliable and rapid union at docking site, attention should be paid to the following points: Ilizarov external fixator should be assembled under fluoroscopy monitoring before resection of infected bone. X-ray films should be reviewed every 2 weeks during the bone transport period in order to detect malalignment early and to correct immediately. A further focus of this study was to analyze the MCS, PCS, and VAS of pain during the different treatment periods. Treatment by bone transport reduced physical and mental well-being, and patients suffered from severe pain for long periods of time. At the final follow-up, the scores of physical functioning and pain were still significantly lower when compared with the normal population, and MCS scores were slightly lower comparable to the general population. Although with a long treatment process and the severe pain, the final clinical outcomes have improved significantly. Nevertheless, the final outcomes of this group are still not equal to the normal population, which may be due to muscle atrophy, ankle joint stiffness, and these had a difficultly recovery within a short time. There is a selection bias. In general, young patients are more likely to choose reconstruction of lower extremity, while older patients are more likely to choose amputation. Our series comprised 12 men and 3 women with an average age of 36.9 years (range: 20–55 years), and these patients are extremely motivated and cooperative. This may explain that the MCS scores are equivalent compared with the general population. The majority of complications had been resolved without a negative impact on the final outcome. Our results showed that despite patients suffered the severe pain, significant low MCS and PCS scores in the course of treatment, the final outcome was significantly improved, and even MCS was close to normal. Out study provides more information for patients and surgeons in treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia by bone transport; this will be contribute to decrease in the patients’ fear, increase their compliance with the long treatment period, and improve confidence both for surgeons and patients. There are lots of limitations for this study. One of the main limitations of the present study is the small sample size. This is due to the low incidence of patients with infected nonunion of the tibia in whom treatment by bone transport is required. This study is unique in regard to assessment of quality of life at different stages of the treatment.

Conclusion

Bone transport is a safe option for the treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia despite the high complication rate. The arduous and demanding nature of the clinical course subjects the patient to severe pain, mental, and physical stress. Thankfully, the average VAS scores, PCS, and MCS scores significantly improve within 2 years after the end of treatment. It is essential to explain this to the patients and their relatives before the application of the frame to increase their compliance with the long and emotionally draining treatment.

Acknowledgment

We extend our thanks to the following individuals for their participation in the study: Yang-Jun Zhu, MD, Zhong Li, MD.
  23 in total

1.  The devastating effects of tibial nonunion on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Bryan D Hanus; Milan Sen; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Bone transport combined with locking bridge plate fixation for the treatment of tibial segmental defects: a report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Paul J Girard; Kevin M Kuhn; James R Bailey; John A Lynott; Michael T Mazurek
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Clinical strategies at the docking site of distraction osteogenesis: are open procedures superior to the simple compression of Ilizarov?

Authors:  Giovanni Lovisetti; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique.

Authors:  D Paley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical course, complication rate and outcome of segmental resection and distraction osteogenesis after chronic tibial osteitis.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; Robert Pätzold; Jan Friederichs; Sven Hungerer; Matthias Militz; Volker Bühren
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Outcome of distraction osteogenesis by ring fixator in infected, large bone defects of tibia.

Authors:  Rajesh Rohilla; Karan Siwach; Ashish Devgan; Roop Singh; Jitendra Wadhwani; Naseem Ahmed
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-04-20

7.  Chronic osteomyelitis. The effect of the extent of surgical resection on infection-free survival.

Authors:  A H Simpson; M Deakin; J M Latham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

8.  Autologous bone marrow grafting combined with demineralized bone matrix improves consolidation of docking site after distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Ippokratis Hatzokos; Stavros I Stavridis; Eirini Iosifidou; Dimitrios Karataglis; Anastasios Christodoulou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Is acute compression and distraction superior to segmental bone transport techniques in chronic tibial osteomyelitis ? Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis Techniques.

Authors:  L Eralp; M Kocaoglu; M Celiktas; M Gülşen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  Infected nonunion of tibia and femur treated by bone transport.

Authors:  Peng Yin; Lihai Zhang; Tongtong Li; Licheng Zhang; Guoqi Wang; Jiantao Li; Jianheng Liu; Jianfeng Zhou; Qun Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Trifocal bone transport by using monolateral rail system in treatment of bone defects caused by post-traumatic tibial osteomyelitis].

Authors:  Peng Ren; Chuang Ma
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Surgical treatment outcomes of the Ilizarov and internal osteosynthesis methods in posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the tibia-a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Łukasz Szelerski; Sławomir Żarek; Radosław Górski; Karol Mochocki; Ryszard Górski; Piotr Morasiewicz; Paweł Małdyk
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Impact of Ilizarov Fixation Technique on the Limb Functionality and Self-esteem of Patients with Unilateral Tibial Fractures.

Authors:  Adeel A Siddiqui; Faiza Siddiqui; Masharib Bashar; Mariyam Adeel; Irfan Muhammad Rajput; Muhammad Soughat Katto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-16

4.  Complications of bone transport technique using the Ilizarov method in the lower extremity: a retrospective analysis of 282 consecutive cases over 10 years.

Authors:  Yanshi Liu; Maimaiaili Yushan; Zhenhui Liu; Jialin Liu; Chuang Ma; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial bone defects: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongjie Wen; Shouyan Zhu; Canzhang Li; Yongqing Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The outcomes of Ilizarov treatment in aseptic nonunions of the tibia stratified by treatment strategies and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Łukasz Szelerski; Andżelika Pajchert-Kozłowska; Sławomir Żarek; Radosław Górski; Paweł Małdyk; Piotr Morasiewicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Assessment of Gait after Treatment of Tibial Nonunion with the Ilizarov Method.

Authors:  Łukasz Pawik; Felicja Fink-Lwow; Andżelika Pajchert Kozłowska; Łukasz Szelerski; Sławomir Żarek; Radosław Górski; Malwina Pawik; Wiktor Urbanski; Paweł Reichert; Piotr Morasiewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique?

Authors:  Runguang Li; Guozheng Zhu; Chaojie Chen; Yirong Chen; Gaohong Ren
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia.

Authors:  Łukasz Szelerski; Andżelika Pajchert Kozłowska; Sławomir Żarek; Radosław Górski; Karol Mochocki; Maciej Dejnek; Wiktor Urbański; Paweł Reichert; Piotr Morasiewicz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey.

Authors:  Shuhei Ugaji; Hidenori Matsubara; Satoshi Kato; Yasuhisa Yoshida; Tomo Hamada; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2021 Jan-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.