Literature DB >> 2403498

Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique.

D Paley1.   

Abstract

Difficulties that occur during limb lengthening were subclassified into problems, obstacles, and complications. Problems represented difficulties that required no operative intervention to resolve, while obstacles represented difficulties that required an operative intervention. All intraoperative injuries were considered true complications, and all problems during limb lengthening that were not resolved before the end of treatment were considered true complications. The difficulties that occurred during limb lengthening include muscle contractures, joint luxation, axial deviation, neurologic injury, vascular injury, premature consolidation, delayed consolidation, nonunion, pin site problems, and hardware failure. Late complications are those of loss of length, late bowing, and refracture. Joint stiffness may also be a permanent residual complication. Pain and difficulty sleeping are other problems that arise during limb lengthening, especially in the more extensive cases. Forty-six patients had 60 limb segments lengthened between 1.0 and 16.0 cm, with a mean of 5.6 cm. The average treatment time was approximately one month per centimeter for single-level lengthenings with no deformity and 1.2 months per centimeter with deformity correction. The lengthening index for double-level lengthening was 0.57 month per centimeter with no deformity and 0.90 month per centimeter with correction of deformity. In adults, the lengthening index was 1.7 months per centimeter for single-level and 1.1 months per centimeter for double-level lengthening. There were 35 problems that had to be resolved in the outpatient clinic. There were 11 obstacles that required additional operative intervention to resolve. There were 27 true complications, of which 17 were considered minor and ten were considered major complications. Of the major complications, three interfered with achieving the original goals of treatment. All three required further operative intervention to achieve the original goal. These were nonunion in one and late bowing in two. Despite these problems, obstacles, and complications, the original goals of surgery were achieved in 57 of the 60 limb segments treated. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 94% of 46 cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2403498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  286 in total

1.  Gradual correction of idiopathic genu varum deformity using the Ilizarov technique.

Authors:  Young Eun Park; Sang Heon Song; Hyeok Nam Kwon; Mohamed Ahmed Refai; Kwang Won Park; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial lengthening over humeral and tibial intramedullary nails in patients with sequelae of poliomyelitis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Daoyun Chen; Jianmin Chen; Yao Jiang; Fanggang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Principles of callus distraction].

Authors:  S Hankemeier; L Bastian; T Gosling; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Does lengthening and then plating (LAP) shorten duration of external fixation?

Authors:  Ryhor Harbacheuski; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of ultrasound in detection and treatment of nerve compromise in a case of humeral lengthening.

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Craig Fryman; Daniel Bigman; Ronald Adler
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-08-26

6.  Femoral lengthening with lengthening over a nail has fewer complications than intramedullary skeletal kinetic distraction.

Authors:  Shahab Mahboubian; Matthew Seah; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Surgical technique: Lower limb-length equalization by periosteal stripping and periosteal division.

Authors:  Noppachart Limpaphayom; Pairatch Prasongchin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Ilizarov fixator combined with an intramedullary nail for tibial nonunions with bone loss: is it effective?

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Mehmet Erdem; Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Cem Coskun Avci; Necdet Saglam; Fevzi Saglam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Diverse muscle architecture adaptations in a rabbit tibial lengthening model.

Authors:  Mitsuhiko Takahashi; Natsuo Yasui; Tetsuya Enishi; Nori Sato; Takatoshi Mizobuchi; Yukako Homma; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.