Literature DB >> 29136169

Disparagement of health warning labels on cigarette packages and cessation attempts: results from four countries.

Amira Osman1, James F Thrasher2, Hua-Hie Yong3, Edna Arillo-Santillán4, David Hammond5.   

Abstract

Health warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packs that use strong fear appeals may evoke defensive responses including acts of disparaging the warnings. Whether warning disparagement undermines HWL effectiveness remains unclear. We assessed correlates of one type of HWL disparagement and its association with subsequent cessation attempts. Longitudinal data (2012-14) on adult smokers from Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States (US) were analyzed. HWL disparagement was assessed as the frequency of making fun of HWLs in the past month. Using Generalized Estimating Equation models we estimated correlates of HWL disparagement and whether HWL disparagement predicted subsequent cessation attempts. In each country, across all waves, 24-31% of smokers reported making fun of the warnings at least once in the past month. More frequent disparagement was found among males, younger participants, those with higher education and greater addiction, and those who recently attempted to quit. Attention to, avoidance of and talking to others about HWLs were all positively associated with HWL disparagement. In all countries, except the US, this type of HWL disparagement was an independent predictor of subsequent cessation attempts. HWL disparagement among smokers may indicate greater warning relevance and processing and does not result in counterproductive effects on cessation efforts.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29136169      PMCID: PMC5914446          DOI: 10.1093/her/cyx065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  35 in total

1.  Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign.

Authors:  Tim McAfee; Kevin C Davis; Robert L Alexander; Terry F Pechacek; Rebecca Bunnell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Romer; Paul Slovic; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Leisha Wharfield; C K Mertz; Stephanie M Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents' smoking-related beliefs and behaviours?

Authors:  Victoria White; Bernice Webster; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Trish Cotter; Todd Harper; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  The U.S. National Tips From Former Smokers Antismoking Campaign: Promoting Awareness of Smoking-Related Risks, Cessation Resources, and Cessation Behaviors.

Authors:  Li-Ling Huang; James F Thrasher; Erika Nayeli Abad; K Michael Cummings; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Abraham Brown; Gera E Nagelhout
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Was the media campaign that supported Australia's new pictorial cigarette warning labels and plain packaging policy associated with more attention to and talking about warning labels?

Authors:  Gera E Nagelhout; Amira Osman; Hua-Hie Yong; Li-Ling Huang; Ron Borland; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Cigarette graphic warning labels and smoking prevalence in Canada: a critical examination and reformulation of the FDA regulatory impact analysis.

Authors:  Jidong Huang; Frank J Chaloupka; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey.

Authors:  Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Nick Wilson; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; K Michael Cummings; Warwick Hosking; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Cigarette package inserts can promote efficacy beliefs and sustained smoking cessation attempts: A longitudinal assessment of an innovative policy in Canada.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Kamala Swayampakala; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Dien Anshari; Dean M Krugman; James W Hardin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Laura E Bach; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Jennifer R Mendel; Seth M Noar; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Research on Youth and Young Adult Tobacco Use, 2013-2018, From the Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Effectiveness of Mental Health Warnings on Tobacco Packaging in People With and Without Common Mental Health Conditions: An Online Randomised Experiment.

Authors:  Katherine Sawyer; Chloe Burke; Ronnie Long Yee Ng; Tom P Freeman; Sally Adams; Gemma Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.435

4.  Testing Cessation Messages for Cigarette Package Inserts: Findings from a Best/Worst Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Farahnaz Islam; Rachel E Davis; Lucy Popova; Victoria Lambert; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi G Salloum; Jordan Louviere; David Hammond
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.