Literature DB >> 21474501

Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.

Emily Brennan1, Sarah J Durkin, Trish Cotter, Todd Harper, Melanie A Wakefield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Australia, introduction of pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets was supported by a televised media campaign highlighting illnesses featured in two of the warning labels--gangrene and mouth cancer.
METHODS: Two studies examined whether the warnings and the television advertisements complemented one another. Population telephone surveys of two cross-sections of adult smokers measured changes in top-of-mind awareness of smoking-related health effects from before (2005; n=587) to after the pack warnings were introduced (2006; n=583). A second study assessed cognitive and emotional responses and intentions to quit after smokers watched one of the campaign advertisements, comparing outcomes of those with and without prior pack warning exposure.
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2006, the proportion of smokers aware that gangrene is caused by smoking increased by 11.2 percentage points (OR=23.47, p=0.000), and awareness of the link between smoking and mouth cancer increased by 6.6 percentage points (OR=2.00, p=0.006). In contrast, awareness of throat cancer decreased by 4.3 percentage points, and this illness was mentioned in the pack warnings but not the advertisements. In multivariate analyses, smokers who had prior exposure to the warnings were significantly more likely to report positive responses to the advertisements and stronger post-exposure quitting intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: Television advertisements and pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets may operate in a complementary manner to positively influence awareness of the health consequences of smoking and motivation to quit. Jurisdictions implementing pictorial warnings should consider the benefits of supportive mass media campaigns to increase the depth, meaning and personal relevance of the warnings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21474501     DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.039321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  49 in total

1.  The association between exposure to point-of-sale anti-smoking warnings and smokers' interest in quitting and quit attempts: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Lin Li; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Sara C Hitchman; Melanie A Wakefield; Karin A Kasza; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Kathy Z Tang; Valentina Souprountchouk; Dana Campetti; Joseph N Cappella; Lynn T Kozlowski; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Seth M Noar; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Laura E Bach; Sean Hanley; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Longer term impact of cigarette package warnings in Australia compared with the United Kingdom and Canada.

Authors:  Lin Li; Ron Borland; Hua Yong; Kenneth M Cummings; James F Thrasher; Sara C Hitchman; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

5.  Monárrez-Espino and Galanti respond.

Authors:  Joel Monárrez-Espino; Rosaria Galanti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Public Understanding of Cigarette Smoke Chemicals: Longitudinal Study of US Adults and Adolescents.

Authors:  Michelle Jeong; Seth M Noar; Dongyu Zhang; Jennifer R Mendel; Robert P Agans; Marcella H Boynton; M Justin Byron; Sabeeh A Baig; Leah M Ranney; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Steven B Lowen; Daniel Romer; Mario Giorno; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research.

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Emily Anne McDonald; Sohrab Sidhu; Rachel Barry; Tracey A Richers Maruyama; Nicolas M Sheon; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Does tobacco-control mass media campaign exposure prevent relapse among recent quitters?

Authors:  Melanie A Wakefield; Steven J Bowe; Sarah J Durkin; Hua-Hie Yong; Matthew J Spittal; Julie A Simpson; Ron Borland
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.