| Literature DB >> 29135954 |
Pavol Tisovský1, Róbert Šandrik2, Miroslav Horváth3, Jana Donovalová4, Juraj Filo5, Martin Gáplovský6, Klaudia Jakusová7, Marek Cigáň8, Róbert Sokolík9, Anton Gáplovský10.
Abstract
FiveEntities:
Keywords: FTIR; NMR spectroscopy; UV–Vis; azanion aggregation; counterion effect; isatin azanions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29135954 PMCID: PMC6150331 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22111961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Molecular structures of studied isatin derivatives A–E. Isatin D is a new compound, and so far, it has not yet been described in literature.
Figure 1(a) Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra A–E (1 × 10−4 mol·dm−3) and (b) corresponding azanions in the presence of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (1 × 10−2 mol·dm−3).
Scheme 2The charge distribution in the studied molecules.
Scheme 3Resonance structure of the studied azanions (A–E).
UV–Vis spectra of A–E and their azanions (1 × 10−4 mol·dm−3) in DMSO and CH3CN.
| Compound | DMSO | CH3CN | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | λmax/logε | |
| 259/3.43 | 298/3.53 | 415/2.93 | - | 242/4.37 | 295/3.55 | 408/2.91 | - | |
| 266/4.30 | 297P/3.46 | - | 569/2.82 | 255/4.41 | 292P/3.41 | - | 555/2.75 | |
| 278/3.93 | 329/3.89 | - | - | 275/4.24 | 316/4.02 | - | - | |
| 294P/3.63 | 296P/3.61 | 417/4.20 | 531P/3.34 | 290P/3.74 | - | 410/4.36 | 508/3.48 | |
| - | 348/3.92 | 409P/3.11 | - | - | 343/3.92 | 400P/3.11 | - | |
| 269/4.43 | 340/3.72 | - | 509/2.89 | 265/4.41 | 338/3.67 | - | 512/2.82 | |
| - | 309/3.89 | 461/3.38 | - | 278P/3.56 | 320P/3.12 | 443/2.90 | - | |
| 277/4.46 | 322/3.99 | 421/3.08 | 610/3.24 | 274/3.86 | 320/3.35 | 405/2.47 | 597/2.60 | |
| - | 329/3.52 | 421/3.22 | - | - | 327/3.41 | 416/3.18 | - | |
| 290P/4.01 | 341P/3.26 | - | 576/2.95 | 284P/3.98 | 331P/3.22 | - | 554/2.90 | |
* Saturated solution, P: Shoulder. λmax: maximum absorption, ε: molar attenuation coefficient.
Figure 2Effect of water (cH2O = 1 × 1.85 mol·dm−3) on A-azanion UV–Vis spectrum in acetonitrile, (cA = 1 × 10−4 mol·dm−3; cTBAF = 1 × 10−3 mol·dm−3).
Scheme 4Mechanism of azanion formation.
Rate constants to characterize VI or V (A–E) formation (1 × 10−4 mol·dm−3) in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) (1 × 10−2 mol·dm−3) in DMSO.
| DMSO | 10−2
|
|---|---|
| 5.98 | |
| 2.84 | |
| 1.77 | |
| 1.34 | |
| 0 |
Calculation of k from loss of azanion absorbance (formation of V). ** Calculation of k from the increase in the open-form absorbance (formation of VI).
Figure 3B UV–Vis spectra change (1 × 10−4 mol·dm−3) in the presence of (a) alkali metal acetates (b) other metal acetates in DMSO.
Position of the absorption maxima A–E isatin derivative carbonyls (ν, ν and their azanions (A–E).
| Compound * | ATR/(cm−1) | CH3CN/(cm−1) | CHCl3/(cm−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1724 | 1744 | 1743 | ||
| 1746 | 1761 | 1760 | ||
| 1716 | 1720 | 1719 | ||
| 1645 | 1632 | 1645 | ||
| 1723 | - | - | ||
| 1570 | - | - | ||
| 1733 | - | - | ||
| 1676 | - | - | ||
| 1749, 1732 | 1757 | 1754 | ||
| 1770 | 1768 | 1774p | ||
| 1735 | 1735 | 1734 | ||
| 1674 | 1677 | 1672 | ||
| 1743 | - | - | ||
| 1654, 1597 | - | - | ||
| 1745p,1734 | - | - | ||
| 1696, 1605 | - | - | ||
| 1730 | - | - | ||
| 1748 | - | - | ||
| 1716 | - | - | ||
| 1646 | - | - | ||
| 1714 | - | - | ||
| 1634 | - | - | ||
| 1732 | - | - | ||
| 1763 | - | - | ||
| 1681 | - | - | ||
| 1650p | - | - | ||
| 1705 | - | - | ||
| 1685p | - | - | ||
| 1731 | - | - | ||
| 1743 | - | - | ||
| 1727 | - | - | ||
| 1652 | - | - | ||
| 1710 | - | - | ||
| 1634 | - | - |
Attenuated total reflection (ATR); * Vibrational modes: ν-Stretching.
Figure 4Change of the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of B (1 × 10−2 mol·dm−3) in CH3CN depending on concentration of TBAF.
Scheme 5Resonance structure of the B-azanion.
Figure 5Change of FTIR spectra of A (1 × 10−2 mol·dm−3) in CHCl3 depending on the TBAF concentration.
Scheme 6Cation can affect the charge distribution in the isatin anion.
Figure 6Effect of TBA+ and Ag+ on A-azanion FTIR spectrum (ATR spectra).
Figure 7Effect of the counter ion on the B-azanion FTIR spectrum (ATR).
Figure 8FTIR spectra of D in the presence of TBA+ and Ag+ (ATR spectra).
Chemical shifts of the A–E isatin derivatives and their azanions in 1H-NMR in DMSO.
| Compound/Hydrogen | A (ppm) | Aazanion (ppm) | B (ppm) | Bazanion (ppm) | C (ppm) | Cazanion (ppm) | D (ppm) | Dazanion (ppm) | E (ppm) | Eazanion (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 11.03 | - | 11.63 | - | 10.94 | - | 12.25 | - | 11.10 | - |
| H4 | 7.48 | 7.11 | 8.20 | 7.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| H5 | 7.05 | 6.64 | - | - | 6.15 | 6.06 | - | - | 6.99 | 6.29 |
| H6 | 7.57 | 7.27 | 8.43 | 8.04 | - | - | - | - | 7.58 | 7.11 |
| H7 | 6.89 | 6.62 | 7.06 | 6.55 | 5.98 | 6.06 | - | - | 6.87 | 6.36 |
| - | - | - | - | 3.85 | 3.83 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | 3.83 | 3.82 | - | - | - | - | |
| H10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9.14 | 8.45 | - | - |
| H11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.04 | 7.43 | 7.53 | 7.40 |
| H12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9.03 | 8.49 | - | - |
| H15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9.38 | 9.06 | - | - |
| H16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.09 | 7.65 | - | - |
| H17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.97 | 8.64 | - | - |
| H18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7.43 | 7.35 |
| H19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7.43 | 7.30 | |
| H20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7.43 | 7.35 |
| H21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7.53 | 7.40 |
Chemical shifts of the A–E isatin derivatives and their azanions in 13C-NMR in DMSO.
| Compound/Carbon | A (ppm) | Aazanion (ppm) | B (ppm) | Bazanion (ppm) | C (ppm) | Cazanion (ppm) | D (ppm) | Dazanion (ppm) | E (ppm) | Eazanion (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2 | 159.79 | 166.16 | 160.32 | 172.76 | 162.00 | 162.87 | 160.90 | 175.05 | 159.46 | 170.67 |
| C3 | 184.81 | 192.92 | 182.80 | 194.93 | 178.86 | 179.88 | 182.16 | 193.00 | 183.40 | 197.10 |
| C4 | 125.12 | 123.86 | 120.02 | 119.07 | 160.71 | 160.55 | 124.88 | 126.94 | 141.94 | 140.13 |
| C5 | 123.19 | 119.76 | 143.05 | 137.92 | 92.44 | 92.08–92.19 | 138.28 | 140.75 | 124.76 | 118.93 |
| C6 | 138.80 | 138.30 | 133.50 | 134.08 | 170.17 | 170.13 | 146.58 | 151.16 | 138.31 | 137.52 |
| C7 | 112.63 | 114.65 | 112.94 | 115.88 | 91.95 | 92.08–92.19 | 118.76 | 124.48 | 111.52 | 115.48 |
| C8 | 151.15 | 164.16 | 155.62 | 178.84 | 155.08 | 156.93 | 155.90 | 182.50 | 151.90 | 174.99 |
| C9 | 118.26 | 119.65 | 118.59 | 119.34 | 100.97 | 101.08 | 104.76 | 102.42 | 114.65 | 116.87 |
| C4-OCH3 | - | - | - | - | 57.98 | 57.96 | - | - | - | - |
| C6-OCH3 | - | - | - | - | 56.69 | 56.33 | - | - | - | - |
| C10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 134.84 | 127.89 | 136.77 | 138.32 |
| C11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 126.72 | 124.65 | 129.28 | 128.91 |
| C12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 146.15 | 144.23 | - | - |
| C13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| C14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| C15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 154.79 | 153.58 | - | - |
| C16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 125.72 | 123.23 | - | - |
| C17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 134.00 | 133.04 | - | - |
| C18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 128.49 | 128.09 |
| C19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 129.06 | 128.09 |
| C20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 128.49 | 128.09 |
| C21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 129.28 | 128.91 |
Calculated values of deprotonation energies for isatin derivatives A–E, absorption maxima values from calculated UV–Vis spectra, and experimentally determined pKa values.
| ∆ | p | λmax | λmax(azanion) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1206.7 | 8.59 | 374; 261; 218 | 488; 237 | |
| 1181.1 | 6.38 | 357; 256; 211 | 461; 344; 231 | |
| 1213.1 | 8.67 | 312; 213 | 446; 297; 241 | |
| 1196.0 | 6.65 | 420; 240 | 529; 352p; 261 | |
| 1205.6 | 8.57 | 376; 312; 229 | 500; 266; 234 |
* ∆E: overall Gibb’s free energy change after deprotonation; ∆E (kJ·mol−1) = Emolecule − Eazanion.
Figure 9Linear dependence of the calculated deprotonation energies of A–E determined from experimental pKa values of isatin derivatives.
Figure 10Graphical representation of the bond length differences. (a) Comparison of the isatin derivatives and their respective azanions; (b) depiction of the most and least distinct bond length changes caused by deprotonation of the isatine derivatives A–E.