Literature DB >> 29131895

Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mattias Brunström1, Bo Carlberg1.   

Abstract

Importance: High blood pressure (BP) is the most important risk factor for death and cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide. The optimal cutoff for treatment of high BP is debated. Objective: To assess the association between BP lowering treatment and death and CVD at different BP levels. Data Sources: Previous systematic reviews were identified from PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect. Reference lists of these reviews were searched for randomized clinical trials. Randomized clinical trials published after November 1, 2015, were also searched for in PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials during February 2017. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials with at least 1000 patient-years of follow-up, comparing BP-lowering drugs vs placebo or different BP goals were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted from original publications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations assessment tool. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses with Knapp-Hartung modification. Results are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease.
Results: Seventy-four unique trials, representing 306 273 unique participants (39.9% women and 60.1% men; mean age, 63.6 years) and 1.2 million person-years, were included in the meta-analyses. In primary prevention, the association of BP-lowering treatment with major cardiovascular events was dependent on baseline systolic BP (SBP). In trials with baseline SBP 160 mm Hg or above, treatment was associated with reduced risk for death (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00) and a substantial reduction of major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). If baseline SBP ranged from 140 to 159 mm Hg, the association of treatment with mortality was similar (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), but the association with major cardiovascular events was less pronounced (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). In trials with baseline SBP below 140 mm Hg, treatment was not associated with mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06) and major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). In trials including people with previous CHD and mean baseline SBP of 138 mm Hg, treatment was associated with reduced risk for major cardiovascular events (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), but was not associated with survival (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07). Conclusions and Relevance: Primary preventive BP lowering is associated with reduced risk for death and CVD if baseline SBP is 140 mm Hg or higher. At lower BP levels, treatment is not associated with any benefit in primary prevention but might offer additional protection in patients with CHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29131895      PMCID: PMC5833509          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  98 in total

1.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  H H Parving; H Lehnert; J Bröchner-Mortensen; R Gomis; S Andersen; P Arner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria.

Authors:  Folkert W Asselbergs; Gilles F H Diercks; Hans L Hillege; Ad J van Boven; Wilbert M T Janssen; Adriaan A Voors; Dick de Zeeuw; Paul E de Jong; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Wiek H van Gilst
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effects of verapamil added-on trandolapril therapy in hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria: the BENEDICT-B randomized trial.

Authors:  Piero Ruggenenti; Anna Fassi; Aneliya Parvanova Ilieva; Ilian Petrov Iliev; Carlos Chiurchiu; Nadia Rubis; Giulia Gherardi; Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Flavio Gaspari; Annalisa Perna; Paolo Cravedi; Antonio Bossi; Roberto Trevisan; Nicola Motterlini; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Cardiovascular risk and risk factors in a randomized trial of treatment based on the beta-blocker oxprenolol: the International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension (IPPPSH). The IPPPSH Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomised trial.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Jan A Staessen; Fabio Angeli; Giovanni de Simone; Augusto Achilli; Antonello Ganau; Gianfrancesco Mureddu; Sergio Pede; Aldo P Maggioni; Donata Lucci; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The PHARAO study: prevention of hypertension with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients with high-normal blood pressure: a prospective, randomized, controlled prevention trial of the German Hypertension League.

Authors:  Stephan Lüders; Joachim Schrader; Jürgen Berger; Thomas Unger; Walter Zidek; Michael Böhm; Martin Middeke; Wolfgang Motz; Cornelia Lübcke; Andrea Gansz; Ludmer Brokamp; Roland E Schmieder; Peter Trenkwalder; Herrmann Haller; Peter Dominiak
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  92 in total

Review 1.  [Antihypertensive therapy in the elderly].

Authors:  J Schrader; B Schrader
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Brenda J Wilson; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3. 

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Brenda J Wilson; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Dangers of Overly Aggressive Blood Pressure Control.

Authors:  Faisal Rahman; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Antihypertensive medications and risk for incident dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Kendra L Davis-Plourde; Sanaz Sedaghat; Phillip J Tully; Wanmei Wang; Caroline Phillips; Matthew P Pase; Jayandra J Himali; B Gwen Windham; Michael Griswold; Rebecca Gottesman; Thomas H Mosley; Lon White; Vilmundur Guðnason; Stéphanie Debette; Alexa S Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; M Arfan Ikram; Osorio Meirelles; Christophe Tzourio; Lenore J Launer
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults: NICE guideline update 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas R Jones; Terry McCormack; Margaret Constanti; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Orthostatic Hypotension : A Systematic Review and Individual Participant-based Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Jiun-Ruey Hu; Jennifer L Cluett; Anthony Ishak; Carol Mita; Lewis A Lipsitz; Lawrence J Appel; Nigel S Beckett; Ruth L Coleman; William C Cushman; Barry R Davis; Greg Grandits; Rury R Holman; Edgar R Miller; Ruth Peters; Jan A Staessen; Addison A Taylor; Lutgarde Thijs; Jackson T Wright; Kenneth J Mukamal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  From Clinical Trials to Bedside: the Use of Antihypertensives in Aged Individuals. Part 2: Approach to Treatment.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Eric J MacLaughlin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Cardiovascular Risk Factor Burden in Veterans and Non-Veterans with Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Vikas Kotagal; Roger L Albin; Martijn L T M Müller; Nicolaas I Bohnen
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Aiming higher in hopes to achieve lower: the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension versus the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for diagnosis and management of hypertension.

Authors:  Harsh Goel; Hesham Tayel; Sunil K Nadar
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.