Literature DB >> 31088883

James A Dickinson1, Roland Grad2, Brenda J Wilson3, Neil R Bell4, Harminder Singh5, Olga Szafran6, Guylène Thériault7.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID: 31088883      PMCID: PMC6516691     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  24 in total

1.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Screening: when things go wrong.

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Nicholas Pimlott; Roland Grad; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Brenda J Wilson; Stéphane Groulx; Guylène Thériault; Neil R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  New Breast Cancer Screening Technologies in Older Women-Is It Time to Pump the Brakes?

Authors:  Ilana B Richman; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  False-positive screening mammograms and biopsies among women participating in a Canadian provincial breast screening program.

Authors:  Andrew J Coldman; Norm Phillips
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-06

5.  Shared decision making in preventive health care: What it is; what it is not.

Authors:  Roland Grad; France Légaré; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Danielle Kasperavicius; Kaylyn L Kretschmer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening.

Authors:  Eddy Lang; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Danielle Kasperavicius; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Brenda J Wilson; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Alberta Family Physician Electronic Endoscopy study: Quality of 1769 colonoscopies performed by rural Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Michael R Kolber; Nicole Olivier; Oksana Babenko; Ryan Torrie; Lee Green
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The association of colonoscopy quality indicators with the detection of screen-relevant lesions, adverse events, and postcolonoscopy cancers in an asymptomatic Canadian colorectal cancer screening population.

Authors:  Robert J Hilsden; Catherine Dube; Steven J Heitman; Ronald Bridges; S Elizabeth McGregor; Alaa Rostom
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Roerecke; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 44.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.