Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.

Literature DB >> 31088870

Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.

James A Dickinson¹, Roland Grad², Brenda J Wilson³, Neil R Bell⁴, Harminder Singh⁵, Olga Szafran⁶, Guylène Thériault⁷.

Abstract

Year: 2019 PMID： 31088870 PMCID： PMC6516683

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Fam Physician ISSN： 0008-350X Impact factor: 3.275

× No keyword cloud information.

24 in total

1. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors: Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391

2. Screening: when things go wrong.

Authors: James A Dickinson; Nicholas Pimlott; Roland Grad; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Brenda J Wilson; Stéphane Groulx; Guylène Thériault; Neil R Bell
Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.275

3. New Breast Cancer Screening Technologies in Older Women-Is It Time to Pump the Brakes?

Authors: Ilana B Richman; Cary P Gross
Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873

4. False-positive screening mammograms and biopsies among women participating in a Canadian provincial breast screening program.

Authors: Andrew J Coldman; Norm Phillips
Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2012-11-06

5. Shared decision making in preventive health care: What it is; what it is not.

Authors: Roland Grad; France Légaré; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Danielle Kasperavicius; Kaylyn L Kretschmer
Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.275

6. Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening.

Authors: Eddy Lang; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Danielle Kasperavicius; Ainsley Elizabeth Moore; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Brenda J Wilson; Dawn Stacey
Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.275

7. Alberta Family Physician Electronic Endoscopy study: Quality of 1769 colonoscopies performed by rural Canadian family physicians.

Authors: Michael R Kolber; Nicole Olivier; Oksana Babenko; Ryan Torrie; Lee Green
Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.275

8. The association of colonoscopy quality indicators with the detection of screen-relevant lesions, adverse events, and postcolonoscopy cancers in an asymptomatic Canadian colorectal cancer screening population.

Authors: Robert J Hilsden; Catherine Dube; Steven J Heitman; Ronald Bridges; S Elizabeth McGregor; Alaa Rostom
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9. Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors: Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 3.039

10. Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors: Michael Roerecke; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers
Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 44.409

6 in total