Literature DB >> 24818637

The timing and amount of vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training affect poststroke recovery of forelimb strength.

Seth A Hays1, Navid Khodaparast, Andrea Ruiz, Andrew M Sloan, Daniel R Hulsey, Robert L Rennaker, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

Loss of upper arm strength after stroke is a leading cause of disability. Strategies that can enhance the benefits of rehabilitative training could improve motor function after stroke. Recent studies in a rat model of ischemic stroke have demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitative training substantially improves recovery of forelimb strength compared with extensive rehabilitative training without VNS. Here we report that the timing and amount of stimulation affect the degree of forelimb strength recovery. Similar amounts of Delayed VNS delivered 2 h after daily rehabilitative training sessions resulted in significantly less improvement compared with that on delivery of VNS that is paired with identical rehabilitative training. Significantly less recovery also occurred when several-fold more VNS was delivered during rehabilitative training. Both delayed and additional VNS confer moderately improved recovery compared with extensive rehabilitative training without VNS, but fail to enhance recovery to the same degree as VNS that is timed to occur with successful movements. These findings confirm that VNS paired with rehabilitative training holds promise for restoring forelimb strength poststroke and indicate that both the timing and the amount of VNS should be optimized to maximize therapeutic benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24818637      PMCID: PMC4039714          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  25 in total

Review 1.  Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors and neuronal functions.

Authors:  Raul R Gainetdinov; Richard T Premont; Laura M Bohn; Robert J Lefkowitz; Marc G Caron
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  S C Schachter; C B Saper
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Plasticity in cat visual cortex restored by electrical stimulation of the locus coeruleus.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; K Watabe; P Heggelund; E Schöller
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke--a controlled trial.

Authors:  J Sivenius; K Pyörälä; O P Heinonen; J T Salonen; P Riekkinen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  R J Nudo; K M Friel
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke.

Authors:  Navid Khodaparast; Seth A Hays; Andrew M Sloan; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity.

Authors:  Colleen G Canning; Louise Ada; Roger Adams; Nicholas J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 8.  Therapeutic mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas R Henry
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Post-training unilateral vagal stimulation enhances retention performance in the rat.

Authors:  K B Clark; S E Krahl; D C Smith; R A Jensen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case series.

Authors:  Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2013-11-20
View more
  39 in total

1.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Delivered with Motor Training Enhances Recovery of Function after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Lily J Kim; Caroline M Abe; Jenny L Trieu; Connie Choua; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Varying Stimulation Parameters to Improve Cortical Plasticity Generated by VNS-tone Pairing.

Authors:  Kristofer W Loerwald; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training improves functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Seth A Hays; Navid Khodaparast; Daniel R Hulsey; Andrea Ruiz; Andrew M Sloan; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The Interval Between VNS-Tone Pairings Determines the Extent of Cortical Map Plasticity.

Authors:  Michael S Borland; Crystal T Engineer; William A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Navzer D Engineer; Sven Vanneste; Pryanka Sharma; Meghan C Pantalia; Mark C Lane; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Norepinephrine and serotonin are required for vagus nerve stimulation directed cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Temporal plasticity in auditory cortex improves neural discrimination of speech sounds.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Jai A Shetake; Navzer D Engineer; Will A Vrana; Jordan T Wolf; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  A limited range of vagus nerve stimulation intensities produce motor cortex reorganization when delivered during training.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; David T Pruitt; Katherine S Adcock; Jobin K Mathew; Stephanie T Abe; Dina M Abdulla; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The supination assessment task: An automated method for quantifying forelimb rotational function in rats.

Authors:  Eric Meyers; Anil Sindhurakar; Rachel Choi; Ruby Solorzano; Taylor Martinez; Andrew Sloan; Jason Carmel; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth Hays
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Plasticity in Pathways Relevant for Extinction Learning.

Authors:  Jessica E Childs; Amanda C Alvarez-Dieppa; Christa K McIntyre; Sven Kroener
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitative Training Enhances Motor Recovery After Bilateral Spinal Cord Injury to Cervical Forelimb Motor Pools.

Authors:  Michael J Darrow; Miranda Torres; Maria J Sosa; Tanya T Danaphongse; Zainab Haider; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.