Literature DB >> 20617892

Spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.

Gui Xue1, Leilei Mei, Chuansheng Chen, Zhong-Lin Lu, Russell Poldrack, Qi Dong.   

Abstract

Spaced learning usually leads to better recognition memory as compared with massed learning, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. One open question is whether the spacing effect is achieved by reducing neural repetition suppression. In this fMRI study, participants were scanned while intentionally memorizing 120 novel faces, half under the massed learning condition (i.e., four consecutive repetitions with jittered interstimulus interval) and the other half under the spaced learning condition (i.e., the four repetitions were interleaved). Recognition memory tests afterward revealed a significant spacing effect: Participants recognized more items learned under the spaced learning condition than under the massed learning condition. Successful face memory encoding was associated with stronger activation in the bilateral fusiform gyrus, which showed a significant repetition suppression effect modulated by subsequent memory status and spaced learning. Specifically, remembered faces showed smaller repetition suppression than forgotten faces under both learning conditions, and spaced learning significantly reduced repetition suppression. These results suggest that spaced learning enhances recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20617892      PMCID: PMC3297428          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  33 in total

1.  Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks.

Authors:  Riccardo Russo; Nicola Mammarella; S E Avons
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming.

Authors:  R N Henson; A Rylands; E Ross; P Vuilleumeir; M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Evidence for neural effects of repetition that directly correlate with behavioral priming.

Authors:  Luigi Maccotta; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Robust group analysis using outlier inference.

Authors:  Mark Woolrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient-processing theory.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory.

Authors:  R Russo; A J Parkin; S R Taylor; J Wilks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

9.  Handedness, sex, and familial sinistrality effects on spatial tasks.

Authors:  P J Snyder; L J Harris
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Preserved neural correlates of priming in old age and dementia.

Authors:  Cindy Lustig; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  33 in total

1.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Kathleen M Arnold; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.

Authors:  Emily J Ward; Marvin M Chun; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Brain regions that show repetition suppression and enhancement: A meta-analysis of 137 neuroimaging experiments.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Repetition and brain potentials when recognizing natural scenes: task and emotion differences.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Marie Karlsson; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Network structure underlying resolution of conflicting non-verbal and verbal social information.

Authors:  Takamitsu Watanabe; Noriaki Yahata; Yuki Kawakubo; Hideyuki Inoue; Yosuke Takano; Norichika Iwashiro; Tatsunobu Natsubori; Hidemasa Takao; Hiroki Sasaki; Wataru Gonoi; Mizuho Murakami; Masaki Katsura; Akira Kunimatsu; Osamu Abe; Kiyoto Kasai; Hidenori Yamasue
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Repetition related changes in activation and functional connectivity in hippocampus predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Christopher A Paynter; Mark E Wheeler; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces.

Authors:  Leilei Mei; Gui Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Feng Xue; Mingxia Zhang; Qi Dong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A Program to Prepare Clinical Pharmacy Faculty Members to Use Entrustable Professional Activities in Experiential Education.

Authors:  Anastasia Rivkin; Lillian Rozaklis; Sasha Falbaum
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Facilitating memory for novel characters by reducing neural repetition suppression in the left fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Leilei Mei; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Russell A Poldrack; Qi Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.