Literature DB >> 29122935

In vivo measurements of interindividual differences in DNA glycosylases and APE1 activities.

Isaac A Chaim1,2, Zachary D Nagel1,2, Jennifer J Jordan1,2, Patrizia Mazzucato1,2, Le P Ngo1,2, Leona D Samson3,2,4,5.   

Abstract

The integrity of our DNA is challenged with at least 100,000 lesions per cell on a daily basis. Failure to repair DNA damage efficiently can lead to cancer, immunodeficiency, and neurodegenerative disease. Base excision repair (BER) recognizes and repairs minimally helix-distorting DNA base lesions induced by both endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging agents. Levels of BER-initiating DNA glycosylases can vary between individuals, suggesting that quantitating and understanding interindividual differences in DNA repair capacity (DRC) may enable us to predict and prevent disease in a personalized manner. However, population studies of BER capacity have been limited because most methods used to measure BER activity are cumbersome, time consuming and, for the most part, only allow for the analysis of one DNA glycosylase at a time. We have developed a fluorescence-based multiplex flow-cytometric host cell reactivation assay wherein the activity of several enzymes [four BER-initiating DNA glycosylases and the downstream processing apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1)] can be tested simultaneously, at single-cell resolution, in vivo. Taking advantage of the transcriptional properties of several DNA lesions, we have engineered specific fluorescent reporter plasmids for quantitative measurements of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, alkyl-adenine DNA glycosylase, MutY DNA glycosylase, uracil DNA glycosylase, and APE1 activity. We have used these reporters to measure differences in BER capacity across a panel of cell lines collected from healthy individuals, and to generate mathematical models that predict cellular sensitivity to methylmethane sulfonate, H2O2, and 5-FU from DRC. Moreover, we demonstrate the suitability of these reporters to measure differences in DRC in multiple pathways using primary lymphocytes from two individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA glycosylase; DNA repair; apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1; base excision repair; transcriptional mutagenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29122935      PMCID: PMC5715766          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712032114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

1.  Effects of endogenous DNA base lesions on transcription elongation by mammalian RNA polymerase II. Implications for transcription-coupled DNA repair and transcriptional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Isao Kuraoka; Masaki Endou; Yuki Yamaguchi; Tadashi Wada; Hiroshi Handa; Kiyoji Tanaka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Repair of oxidized bases in DNA bubble structures by human DNA glycosylases NEIL1 and NEIL2.

Authors:  Hong Dou; Sankar Mitra; Tapas K Hazra
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Overview of base excision repair biochemistry.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Kim; David M Wilson
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.339

4.  Mechanism of transcriptional stalling at cisplatin-damaged DNA.

Authors:  Gerke E Damsma; Aaron Alt; Florian Brueckner; Thomas Carell; Patrick Cramer
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-11       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation.

Authors:  F S Collins; L D Brooks; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Elevated N3-methylpurine-DNA glycosylase DNA repair activity is associated with lung cancer.

Authors:  Philip A J Crosbie; Amanda J Watson; Raymond Agius; Philip V Barber; Geoffrey P Margison; Andrew C Povey
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Novel activities of human uracil DNA N-glycosylase for cytosine-derived products of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  M Dizdaroglu; A Karakaya; P Jaruga; G Slupphaug; H E Krokan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Interindividual variation in the activity of O6-methyl guanine-DNA methyltransferase and uracil-DNA glycosylase in human organs.

Authors:  B Myrnes; K E Giercksky; H Krokan
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Minor Changes in Expression of the Mismatch Repair Protein MSH2 Exert a Major Impact on Glioblastoma Response to Temozolomide.

Authors:  José L McFaline-Figueroa; Christian J Braun; Monica Stanciu; Zachary D Nagel; Patrizia Mazzucato; Dewakar Sangaraju; Edvinas Cerniauskas; Kelly Barford; Amanda Vargas; Yimin Chen; Natalia Tretyakova; Jacqueline A Lees; Michael T Hemann; Forest M White; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Human uracil-DNA glycosylase deficiency associated with profoundly impaired immunoglobulin class-switch recombination.

Authors:  Kohsuke Imai; Geir Slupphaug; Wen-I Lee; Patrick Revy; Shigeaki Nonoyama; Nadia Catalan; Leman Yel; Monique Forveille; Bodil Kavli; Hans E Krokan; Hans D Ochs; Alain Fischer; Anne Durandy
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 25.606

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescent Probes of DNA Repair.

Authors:  David L Wilson; Eric T Kool
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  High-Throughput Screening Platform for Nanoparticle-Mediated Alterations of DNA Repair Capacity.

Authors:  Sneh M Toprani; Dimitrios Bitounis; Qiansheng Huang; Nathalia Oliveira; Kee Woei Ng; Chor Yong Tay; Zachary D Nagel; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Excision of mutagenic replication-blocking lesions suppresses cancer but promotes cytotoxicity and lethality in nitrosamine-exposed mice.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Joshua J Corrigan; Amanda L Armijo; Ilana S Nazari; Ishwar N Kohale; Dorothea K Torous; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Robert G Croy; Dushan N Wadduwage; Sebastian E Carrasco; Stephen D Dertinger; Forest M White; John M Essigmann; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Signal-on/signal-off bead-based assays for the multiplexed monitoring of base excision repair activities by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Guillaume Gines; Charlotte Brusa; Christine Saint-Pierre; Didier Gasparutto
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Large-scale preparation of fluorescence multiplex host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) reporters.

Authors:  C G Piett; T J Pecen; D J Laverty; Z D Nagel
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 17.021

6.  A panel of colorimetric assays to measure enzymatic activity in the base excision DNA repair pathway.

Authors:  Eleanor Healing; Clara F Charlier; Lisiane B Meira; Ruan M Elliott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.

Authors:  Martyn T Smith; Kathryn Z Guyton; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Alexandre Borrel; Andres Cardenas; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dean W Felsher; Catherine F Gibbons; William H Goodson; Keith A Houck; Agnes B Kane; Michele A La Merrill; Herve Lebrec; Leroy Lowe; Cliona M McHale; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Linda Rieswijk; Martha S Sandy; Hideko Sone; Amy Wang; Luoping Zhang; Lauren Zeise; Mark Fielden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Fluorescence Sheds Light on DNA Damage, DNA Repair, and Mutations.

Authors:  Norah A Owiti; Zachary D Nagel; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-11-14

9.  CometChip analysis of human primary lymphocytes enables quantification of inter-individual differences in the kinetics of repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Le P Ngo; Simran Kaushal; Isaac A Chaim; Patrizia Mazzucato; Catherine Ricciardi; Leona D Samson; Zachary D Nagel; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.101

10.  EGFP Reporters for Direct and Sensitive Detection of Mutagenic Bypass of DNA Lesions.

Authors:  Marta Rodriguez-Alvarez; Daria Kim; Andriy Khobta
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.