Literature DB >> 33710878

High-Throughput Screening Platform for Nanoparticle-Mediated Alterations of DNA Repair Capacity.

Sneh M Toprani1, Dimitrios Bitounis2, Qiansheng Huang2,3, Nathalia Oliveira2, Kee Woei Ng2,4,5, Chor Yong Tay4,6, Zachary D Nagel1, Philip Demokritou2.   

Abstract

The potential genotoxic effects of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) may occur through the induction of DNA damage or the disruption of DNA repair processes. Inefficient DNA repair may lead to the accumulation of DNA lesions and has been linked to various diseases, including cancer. Most studies so far have focused on understanding the nanogenotoxicity of ENM-induced damages to DNA, whereas the effects on DNA repair have been widely overlooked. The recently developed fluorescence multiplex-host-cell reactivation (FM-HCR) assay allows for the direct quantification of multiple DNA repair pathways in living cells and offers a great opportunity to address this methodological gap. Herein an FM-HCR-based method is developed to screen the impact of ENMs on six major DNA repair pathways using suspended or adherent cells. The sensitivity and efficiency of this DNA repair screening method were demonstrated in case studies using primary human small airway epithelial cells and TK6 cells exposed to various model ENMs (CuO, ZnO, and Ga2O3) at subcytotoxic doses. It was shown that ENMs may inhibit nucleotide-excision repair, base-excision repair, and the repair of oxidative damage by DNA glycosylases in TK6 cells, even in the absence of significant genomic DNA damage. It is of note that the DNA repair capacity was increased by some ENMs, whereas it was suppressed by others. Overall, this method can be part of a multitier, in vitro hazard assessment of ENMs as a functional, high-throughput platform that provides insights into the interplay of the properties of ENMs, the DNA repair efficiency, and the genomic stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA repair; FM-HCR; engineered nanomaterials; genotoxicity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33710878      PMCID: PMC8111687          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c09254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  132 in total

Review 1.  The holy grail in genetic toxicology: follow-up approaches for positive results in the Ames assay.

Authors:  Marilyn J Aardema
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Toxicological effects of ingested nanocellulose in in vitro intestinal epithelium and in vivo rat models.

Authors:  Glen M DeLoid; Xiaoqiong Cao; Ramon M Molina; Daniel Imbassahy Silva; Kunal Bhattacharya; Kee Woei Ng; Say Chye Joachim Loo; Joseph D Brain; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019-06-18

3.  In vivo measurements of interindividual differences in DNA glycosylases and APE1 activities.

Authors:  Isaac A Chaim; Zachary D Nagel; Jennifer J Jordan; Patrizia Mazzucato; Le P Ngo; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Engineering Two-dimensional Nanomaterials to Enable Structure-Activity Relationship Studies in Nanosafety Research.

Authors:  Dorsa Parviz; Dimitrios Bitounis; Philip Demokritou; Michael Strano
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-04-18

Review 5.  Nanotechnology to the rescue: using nano-enabled approaches in microbiological food safety and quality.

Authors:  Mary Eleftheriadou; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Comparison of the DNA damage response in BEAS-2B and A549 cells exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  M Biola-Clier; D Beal; S Caillat; S Libert; L Armand; N Herlin-Boime; S Sauvaigo; T Douki; M Carriere
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Summary of complementation groups of UV-sensitive CHO cell mutants isolated by large-scale screening.

Authors:  D Busch; C Greiner; K Lewis; R Ford; G Adair; L Thompson
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing.

Authors:  E van der Pol; F A W Coumans; A E Grootemaat; C Gardiner; I L Sargent; P Harrison; A Sturk; T G van Leeuwen; R Nieuwland
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 9.  The Toxicity of Nanoparticles Depends on Multiple Molecular and Physicochemical Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yue-Wern Huang; Melissa Cambre; Han-Jung Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Defective DNA base excision repair in brain from individuals with Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Lior Weissman; Dong-Gyu Jo; Martin M Sørensen; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; William R Markesbery; Mark P Mattson; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Experimental and Computational Nanotoxicology-Complementary Approaches for Nanomaterial Hazard Assessment.

Authors:  Valérie Forest
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 2.  Nanosafety: An Evolving Concept to Bring the Safest Possible Nanomaterials to Society and Environment.

Authors:  Filipa Lebre; Nivedita Chatterjee; Samantha Costa; Eli Fernández-de-Gortari; Carla Lopes; João Meneses; Luís Ortiz; Ana R Ribeiro; Vânia Vilas-Boas; Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 3.  Human Variation in DNA Repair, Immune Function, and Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Ana Cheong; Zachary D Nagel
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 8.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.