Literature DB >> 34324980

CometChip analysis of human primary lymphocytes enables quantification of inter-individual differences in the kinetics of repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Le P Ngo1, Simran Kaushal2, Isaac A Chaim3, Patrizia Mazzucato4, Catherine Ricciardi5, Leona D Samson6, Zachary D Nagel7, Bevin P Engelward8.   

Abstract

Although DNA repair is known to impact susceptibility to cancer and other diseases, relatively few population studies have been performed to evaluate DNA repair kinetics in people due to the difficulty of assessing DNA repair in a high-throughput manner. Here we use the CometChip, a high-throughput comet assay, to explore inter-individual variation in repair of oxidative damage to DNA, a known risk factor for aging, cancer and other diseases. DNA repair capacity after H2O2-induced DNA oxidation damage was quantified in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). For 10 individuals, blood was drawn at several times over the course of 4-6 weeks. In addition, blood was drawn once from each of 56 individuals. DNA damage levels were quantified prior to exposure to H2O2 and at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120-min post exposure. We found that there is significant variability in DNA repair efficiency among individuals. When subdivided into quartiles by DNA repair efficiency, we found that the average t1/2 is 81 min for the slowest group and 24 min for the fastest group. This work shows that the CometChip can be used to uncover significant differences in repair kinetics among people, pointing to its utility in future epidemiological and clinical studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CometChip; DNA damage; DNA repair; Repair kinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34324980      PMCID: PMC8477454          DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   8.101


  84 in total

1.  Attempted base excision repair of ionizing radiation damage in human lymphoblastoid cells produces lethal and mutagenic double strand breaks.

Authors:  Ning Yang; Heather Galick; Susan S Wallace
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-10-05

2.  Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays.

Authors:  David K Wood; David M Weingeist; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Does vitamin D protect against DNA damage?

Authors:  Visalini Nair-Shalliker; Bruce K Armstrong; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins; Vikki Harrington; Janice Drew; Rachel Melvin
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  A modified alkaline comet assay for measuring DNA repair capacity in human populations.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  An oligonucleotide microarray for the monitoring of repair enzyme activity toward different DNA base damage.

Authors:  Sylvie Sauvaigo; Valérie Guerniou; Delphine Rapin; Didier Gasparutto; Sylvain Caillat; Alain Favier
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 7.  An Overview of PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Cortesi; Hope S Rugo; Christian Jackisch
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Parp1 protects against Aag-dependent alkylation-induced nephrotoxicity in a sex-dependent manner.

Authors:  Jennifer A Calvo; Mariacarmela Allocca; Kimberly R Fake; Sureshkumar Muthupalani; Joshua J Corrigan; Roderick T Bronson; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-19

Review 9.  Nutrition Can Help DNA Repair in the Case of Aging.

Authors:  Julia Kaźmierczak-Barańska; Karolina Boguszewska; Boleslaw T Karwowski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Deep multi-region whole-genome sequencing reveals heterogeneity and gene-by-environment interactions in treatment-naive, metastatic lung cancer.

Authors:  Tracy L Leong; Velimir Gayevskiy; Daniel P Steinfort; Marc R De Massy; Alvaro Gonzalez-Rajal; Kieren D Marini; Emily Stone; Venessa Chin; Adrian Havryk; Marshall Plit; Louis B Irving; Barton R Jennings; Rachael A McCloy; W Samantha N Jayasekara; Muhammad Alamgeer; Vishal Boolell; Andrew Field; Prudence A Russell; Beena Kumar; Daniel J Gough; Anette Szczepny; Vinod Ganju; Fernando J Rossello; Jason E Cain; Anthony T Papenfuss; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Mark J Cowley; D Neil Watkins
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reduced DNA Repair Capacity in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Phenotypic Approach Using the CometChip.

Authors:  Carmen Ortiz-Sánchez; Jarline Encarnación-Medina; Jong Y Park; Natasha Moreno; Gilberto Ruiz-Deya; Jaime Matta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Human Variation in DNA Repair, Immune Function, and Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Ana Cheong; Zachary D Nagel
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for oxidative DNA damage leading to mutations and chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  Eunnara Cho; Ashley Allemang; Marc Audebert; Vinita Chauhan; Stephen Dertinger; Giel Hendriks; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Kristina Trenz; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.579

4.  A high-throughput 384-well CometChip platform reveals a role for 3-methyladenine in the cellular response to etoposide-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Jianfeng Li; Alison Beiser; Nupur B Dey; Shunichi Takeda; Liton Kumar Saha; Kouji Hirota; L Lynette Parker; Mariah Carter; Martha I Arrieta; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Cell survival after DNA damage in the comet assay.

Authors:  Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu; Carolin Schuele; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.