Literature DB >> 29120225

Descriptive Values for Dancers on Baseline Concussion Tools.

Lauren McIntyre1, Marc Campo2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Capturing baseline data before a concussion can be a valuable tool in individualized care. However, not all athletes, including dancers, have access to baseline testing. When baseline examinations were not performed, clinicians consult normative values. Dancers are unique athletes; therefore, describing values specific to dancers may assist those working with these athletes in making more informed decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To describe values for key concussion measures of dancers. Our secondary aim was to examine whether differences existed between sexes and professional status. Finally, we explored factors that may affect dancers' scores.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Professional dance companies and a collegiate dance conservatory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 238 dancers (university = 153, professional = 85; women = 171; men = 67; age = 21.1 ± 4.8 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We calculated the total symptom severity from the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3rd edition; the Standardized Assessment of Concussion score; the modified Balance Error Scoring System score; and the King-Devick score for each participant. Group differences were analyzed with Mann-Whitney or t tests, depending on the data distribution. We used bivariate correlations to explore the effects of other potential influencing factors.
RESULTS: Participants demonstrated the following baseline outcomes: symptom severity = 16.6 ± 12.8; Standardized Assessment of Concussion = 27.5 ± 1.8; modified Balance Error Scoring System = 3.2 ± 3.1 errors; and King-Devick = 41.5 ± 8.2 seconds. A Mann-Whitney test revealed differences in King-Devick scores between female (40.8 ± 8.0 seconds) and male (43.4 ± 8.4 seconds) dancers ( P = .04). An independent-samples t test also demonstrated a difference in modified Balance Error Scoring System scores between female (2.95 ± 3.1 errors) and male (3.8 ± 3.1 errors) dancers ( P = .02). Age, hours of sleep, height, and history of concussion, depression, or injury did not display moderate or strong associations with any of the outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Dancers' symptom severity scores appeared to be higher than the values reported for other athletes. Additional studies are needed to establish normative values and develop a model for predicting baseline scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  concussion baseline examinations; concussion-management modifiers; traumatic brain injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29120225      PMCID: PMC5737039          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.10.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  33 in total

1.  Personality factors and symptom reporting at baseline in collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Victoria C Merritt; Amanda R Rabinowitz; Peter A Arnett
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  The utility of post-concussion neuropsychological data in identifying cognitive change following sports-related MTBI in the absence of baseline data.

Authors:  Ruben J Echemendia; Jared M Bruce; Christopher M Bailey; James Forrest Sanders; Peter Arnett; Gray Vargas
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Comparing post-concussive neurocognitive test data to normative data presents risks for under-classifying "above average" athletes.

Authors:  Philip Schatz; Stacey Robertshaw
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.813

4.  Sex and age differences in depression and baseline sport-related concussion neurocognitive performance and symptoms.

Authors:  Tracey Covassin; Robert J Elbin; Elizabeth Larson; Anthony P Kontos
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.638

5.  Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Wei-Han Chua; Ching-Ye Hong; Hui-Min Wu; Kee-Seng Chia; Richard A Stone; Donald Tan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Sport and team differences on baseline measures of sport-related concussion.

Authors:  Adam Zimmer; Kyle Piecora; Danielle Schuster; Frank Webbe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-2: baseline values for high school athletes.

Authors:  Thomas M Jinguji; Viviana Bompadre; Kimberly G Harmon; Emma K Satchell; Kaiulani Gilbert; Jennifer Wild; Janet F Eary
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Reliability and Validity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT3) in High School and Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Esther Y Chin; Lindsay D Nelson; William B Barr; Paul McCrory; Michael A McCrea
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.

Authors:  Kimberly G Harmon; Jonathan A Drezner; Matthew Gammons; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Mark Halstead; Stanley A Herring; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Andrea Pana; Margot Putukian; William O Roberts
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Normative data for the balance error scoring system in adults.

Authors:  Grant L Iverson; Michael S Koehle
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  The King-Devick test in an outpatient concussion clinic: Assessing the diagnostic and prognostic value of a vision test in conjunction with exercise testing among acutely concussed adolescents.

Authors:  Justine B Lawrence; Mohammad N Haider; John J Leddy; Andrea Hinds; Jeffery C Miecznikowski; Barry S Willer
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 3.181

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.