Justine B Lawrence1, Mohammad N Haider2, John J Leddy3, Andrea Hinds3, Jeffery C Miecznikowski4, Barry S Willer5. 1. Department of Neuroscience, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. Electronic address: jblawren@buffalo.edu. 2. Department of Neuroscience, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States; UBMD Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. 3. UBMD Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the King-Devick (K-D) test in conjunction with treadmill testing in adolescents after sport-related concussion (SRC) in an outpatient concussion management clinic without baseline measures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: The K-D test was administered pre- and post-exercise on a graded treadmill test to acutely concussed (AC, <10 days from injury, n = 46, 15.4 ± 2.1 years) participants for 2 clinic visits (1 week apart) and to matched controls (MC, n = 30, 15.8 ± 1.4 years) for 2 visits (1 week apart). Initial K-D test times were compared between MC and AC. Changes in times from pre- to post- exercise during a treadmill test were compared for MC and AC and from Visit 1 to Visit 2. Smooth pursuits and repetitive saccades were compared with initial visit K-D test performance. RESULTS: Comparison of pre-exercise K-D test times at Visit 1 distinguished MC from AC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 53.7 ± 13.0 s, p = .007). Comparison of pre- and post-exercise K-D test times revealed significant improvements for MC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 43.1 ± 8.5 s, p < .001) and AC who recovered by Visit 2 (Fast Recovery Group [FRG], n = 23, 50.4 ± 10.0 s vs. 47.3 ± 9.8 s, p = .002). No significant difference was seen in pre- and post-exercise K-D test times on Visit 1 for AC who took longer than 2 weeks to recover (Slow Recovery Group [SRG], n = 23, 57.0 ± 15.0 s vs. 56.0 ± 16.3 s, p = .478). At Visit 1, AC had more abnormal smooth pursuits than MC (17% vs. 3%, non-significant, p = .064). AC, however, had significantly more abnormal repetitive saccades than MC (37% vs. 3%, p = .001) and AC with abnormal repetitive saccades took significantly longer to complete the Visit 1 pre-exercise K-D test than AC with normal repetitive saccades (58.6 ± 16.0 s vs 50.8 ± 10.2 s, p = .049). CONCLUSION: The study supports utility of the K-D test as part of outpatient concussion assessment. Lack of improvement in K-D test performance after an exercise test may be an indicator of delayed recovery from SRC.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the King-Devick (K-D) test in conjunction with treadmill testing in adolescents after sport-related concussion (SRC) in an outpatient concussion management clinic without baseline measures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: The K-D test was administered pre- and post-exercise on a graded treadmill test to acutely concussed (AC, <10 days from injury, n = 46, 15.4 ± 2.1 years) participants for 2 clinic visits (1 week apart) and to matched controls (MC, n = 30, 15.8 ± 1.4 years) for 2 visits (1 week apart). Initial K-D test times were compared between MC and AC. Changes in times from pre- to post- exercise during a treadmill test were compared for MC and AC and from Visit 1 to Visit 2. Smooth pursuits and repetitive saccades were compared with initial visit K-D test performance. RESULTS: Comparison of pre-exercise K-D test times at Visit 1 distinguished MC from AC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 53.7 ± 13.0 s, p = .007). Comparison of pre- and post-exercise K-D test times revealed significant improvements for MC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 43.1 ± 8.5 s, p < .001) and AC who recovered by Visit 2 (Fast Recovery Group [FRG], n = 23, 50.4 ± 10.0 s vs. 47.3 ± 9.8 s, p = .002). No significant difference was seen in pre- and post-exercise K-D test times on Visit 1 for AC who took longer than 2 weeks to recover (Slow Recovery Group [SRG], n = 23, 57.0 ± 15.0 s vs. 56.0 ± 16.3 s, p = .478). At Visit 1, AC had more abnormal smooth pursuits than MC (17% vs. 3%, non-significant, p = .064). AC, however, had significantly more abnormal repetitive saccades than MC (37% vs. 3%, p = .001) and AC with abnormal repetitive saccades took significantly longer to complete the Visit 1 pre-exercise K-D test than AC with normal repetitive saccades (58.6 ± 16.0 s vs 50.8 ± 10.2 s, p = .049). CONCLUSION: The study supports utility of the K-D test as part of outpatient concussion assessment. Lack of improvement in K-D test performance after an exercise test may be an indicator of delayed recovery from SRC.
Authors: Mohammad Nadir Haider; John J Leddy; Sonja Pavlesen; Melissa Kluczynski; John G Baker; Jeffrey C Miecznikowski; Barry S Willer Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Esther Y Chin; Lindsay D Nelson; William B Barr; Paul McCrory; Michael A McCrea Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mohammad N Haider; Phillip R Worts; Kaitlin B Viera; Brendan Villarrubia; Charles G Wilber; Barry S Willer; John J Leddy Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 2.860