| Literature DB >> 29118975 |
Tamer M Hamdy1,2.
Abstract
Background: The newly introduced self-adhering flowable resin-composites decrease the required time for application by incorporation of an acidic adhesive monomer, thus reducing the number of steps, but its bonding is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis at the resin-dentin interface of a self-adhering flowable resin composite (Vertise™Flow Self-Adhering Flowable Composite, Kerr Dental, USA) versus a total-etch (Te-Econom Plus) resin composite, using an etching agent (Eco-Etch gel) and bonding agent (Single Bond Universal).Entities:
Keywords: Self-adhering; bonding system; gap distance; resin composite; resin-dentin interface; total-etch
Year: 2017 PMID: 29118975 PMCID: PMC5649117 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12306.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: F1000Res ISSN: 2046-1402
Marginal gap formation (µm) between groups of teeth restored with different composites.
Group A, treated with total-etch technique; Group B, treated with self-adhering resin composite. Mean and standard deviation (SD) values and results of Student’s t-test for the comparison between gap distances are shown (n=8/group).
| Group A | Group B | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 0.3 | <0.001
[ |
*: Significant at P ≤ 0.05
Figure 1. Selected scanning electron microscopy shows absence of gap formation in dentin for teeth treated with total-etch technique.
Image representative of 8 teeth.
Figure 2. Selected scanning electron microscopy shows presence of gap formation in dentin for teeth treated with a self-adhering resin composite.
Image representative of 8 teeth.
Chemical analysis of the interface between groups of teeth restored with self-adhering resin composite.
Group A, treated with total-etch technique; Group B, treated with self-adhering resin composite. Mean and standard deviation (SD) values and results of Student’s t-test for the comparison between silver atomic % values are shown (n=8/group).
| Group A | Group B |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 8.2 | 0.4 | 12.2 | 0.7 | <0.001
[ |
*: Significant at P ≤ 0.05
Figure 3. Selected scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray analysis at the resin-superficial dentin interfaces in teeth treated with total-etch technique.
Image representative of 8 teeth.
Figure 4. Selected scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray analysis at the resin-superficial dentin interface in teeth treated with self-adhering resin composite.
Image representative of 8 teeth.