| Literature DB >> 35915423 |
Aiah A El-Rashidy1, Rasha M Abdelraouf2, Nour A Habib2.
Abstract
The long-term color stability and gloss retention of resin composites are among the crucial factors that affect the clinical longevity of esthetic restorations, especially in anterior teeth. This study evaluated the effect of artificial aging by immersion in different storage media and thermocycling on color and gloss of dental single-shade resin composite (Omnichroma) versus multi-shade one (Filtek Z350XT). One hundred resin-composite disc-shaped specimens were used, 50 from each group, Omnichroma and Filtek Z350XT. Ten specimens from each material acted as control group (incubated in saliva). For each material, 40 specimens were divided according to the artificial-aging protocol (immersion at 37 °C for 12 days or thermocycling for 10,000 cycles) and storage media (tea, red wine). Color and gloss were measured before and after artificial aging. Color difference (∆E00) was compared with perceptibility threshold and acceptability threshold. Data were statistically analyzed; independent t test was used to compare results between two tested materials, while two-way ANOVA was used to compare results among the different immersion media within the same material. Artificial aging (immersion or thermocycling) in tea and red wine led to significant color changes and gloss reduction in both materials (P < 0.05), in contrast to control group. Red wine produced highest color differences. Both dental resin-composites; the single-shade (Omnichroma) and multi-shade (Filtek Z350XT) displayed unacceptable discoloration and gloss reduction after artificial-aging in tea and red-wine by immersion or thermocycling simulating one-year clinical-service.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial aging; Color; Gloss; Immersion; Single-shade resin composite; Thermocycling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35915423 PMCID: PMC9341039 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02351-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Materials used in this study
| Product | Manufacturer | Filler type | Filler content | Matrix composition | Shade | Lot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt% | vol% | ||||||
| Omnichroma | Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan | Uniform sized supra-nano spherical filler (260 nm spherical SiO2-ZrO2) and composite filler | 79% | 68% | UDMA*, TEGDMA** | Universal | 016E21 |
| Filtek Z350 XT | 3 M ESPE, Minnesota, USA | non-agglomerated/non-aggregated 20 nm silica filler, non-agglomerated/non-aggregated 4 to 11 nm zirconia filler, and aggregated zirconia/silica cluster filler (comprised of 20 nm silica and 4 to 11 nm zirconia particles) | 78.5% | 63.3% | Bis-GMA***, UDMA, TEGDMA, Bis-EMA(6)† PEGDMA†† | A2B | NC93014 |
*UDMA urethane dimethacrylate, **TEGDMA triethylene glycol dimethacrylate,***BisGMA bisphenol A diglycidildimethacrylate, †Bis-EMA Ethoxylatedbisphenol A dimethacrylate. ††PEGDMA polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate
Specimens grouping
| Staining solution | Condition | Temperature | Duration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gp1 | Saliva | Constant temperature immersion | 37 °C | 12 days |
| Gp2 | Tea | Constant temperature immersion | 37 °C | 12 days |
| Gp3 | Red wine | Constant temperature immersion | 37 °C | 12 days |
| Gp4 | Tea | Thermocycling | 37–57 °C | 10,000 cycles |
| Gp5 | Red wine | Thermocycling | 12–37 °C | 10,000 cycles |
Fig. 1Photograph of representative specimens from each group
Mean and standard deviation of ∆E00 after immersion of both materials within each storage medium
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Saliva | 0.86a | 0.07 | 0.88a | 0.08 | |
| Tea | 4.5b | 0.2 | 3.64b | 0.27 | |
| Red wine | 8.12c | 0.29 | 6.52c | 0.22 | |
| < 0.001* | < 0.001* | ||||
Means with different letters in the same column indicate statistically significance difference while means in the same row has no letters as they are two groups only. *Corresponds to statistically significant difference
Mean and standard deviation of ∆E00 after thermocycling of both materials within each storage medium
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Tea | 3.24a | 0.2 | 3.39a | 0.19 | |
| Red wine | 4.3b | 0.26 | 4.4b | 0.21 | |
Means with different letters in the same column indicate statistically significance difference while means in the same row has no letters as they are two groups only. *Corresponds to statistically significant difference
Mean and standard deviation of ∆E00 after aging of both materials within each storage medium:
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After immersion | After thermocycling | After immersion | After thermocycling | |||||||
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Tea | 4.5 | 0.2 | 3.24 | 0.2 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.39 | 0.19 | ||
| Red wine | 8.12 | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.26 | 6.52 | 0.22 | 4.4 | 0.21 | ||
*Corresponds to statistically significant difference
Fig. 2Changes in hue across the red-green axis (Δa)
Fig. 3Changes in hue across the yellow-blue axis (Δb)
Fig. 4Changes in lightness (ΔL)
Mean and standard deviation of gloss of both materials with each storage medium before and after immersion
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before immersion | After immersion | Before immersion | After immersion | |||||||
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Saliva | 31.96a | 2.26 | 32.36a | 2.26 | 37.64a | 1.4 | 38.29a | 1.39 | ||
| Tea | 31.21a | 2.76 | 28.23b | 2.82 | 37.61a | 3.29 | 33.82b | 3.1 | ||
| Red wine | 31.74a | 1.66 | 28.25b | 1.68 | 36.5a | 2.72 | 32.23b | 2.7 | ||
Means with different letters in the same column indicate statistically significance difference while means in the same row has no letters as they are two groups only. *Corresponds to statistically significant difference
Mean and standard deviation of gloss of both materials with each storage medium before and after thermocycling
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After immersion | After thermocycling | After immersion | After thermocycling | |||||||
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Tea | 28.23 | 2.8 | 30.69 | 2.08 | 33.8 | 3.1 | 35.02 | 3.8 | ||
| Red wine | 28.25 | 1.7 | 29.74 | 2.96 | 32.2 | 2.7 | 37.2 | 2.9 | ||
Means with different letters in the same column indicate statistically significance difference while means in the same row has no letters as they are two groups only. *Corresponds to statistically significant difference
Mean and standard deviation of gloss after aging of both materials within each storage medium
| Intervention | Omnichroma | Filtek Z350 XT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After immersion | After thermocycling | After immersion | After thermocycling | |||||||
| Storage medium | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Tea | 28.23 | 2.8 | 30.69 | 2.08 | 33.8 | 3.1 | 35.02 | 3.8 | ||
| Red wine | 28.25 | 1.7 | 29.74 | 2.96 | 32.2 | 2.7 | 37.2 | 2.9 | ||
*Corresponds to statistically significant difference