| Literature DB >> 29118402 |
Xiaodong Qu1,2, Ze Ren3, Haiping Zhang2, Min Zhang2, Yuhang Zhang1,4, Xiaobo Liu1,2, Wenqi Peng5,6.
Abstract
Stream ecosystems are the primary receivers of nutrieEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29118402 PMCID: PMC5678132 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15624-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study area and sample sites. The map was created in ArcGIS 14.0 (http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/) using ASTER GDEM data download from USGS (ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA).
Nutrient variations in stream water and benthic biofilms of upstream sites and downstream sites (Means ± SD, abbreviations as in text).
| Upstream | Downstream | P (t-test) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TN (μg/L) | 268.6 ± 65.61 | 900.0 ± 376.41 | 0.006 |
| NO3 − (μg/L) | 208.0 ± 59.01 | 689.8 ± 413.12 | 0.033 |
| NH4 + (μg/L) | 14.6 ± 6.50 | 16.0 ± 4.64 | 0.705 |
| TP (μg/L) | 36.4 ± 8.99 | 50.8 ± 11.73 | 0.061 |
| SRP (μg/L) | 21.8 ± 8.70 | 31.6 ± 7.06 | 0.086 |
| DOC (mg/L) | 1.1 ± 0.36 | 1.6 ± 0.38 | 0.101 |
| Bio-C (nmol/mm2) | 50.52 ± 28.82 | 152.02 ± 93.38 | 0.049 |
| Bio-N (nmol/mm2) | 1.6 ± 1.35 | 8.5 ± 6.04 | 0.037 |
| Bio-P (nmol/mm2) | 0.45 ± 0.18 | 1.42 ± 0.85 | 0.036 |
Correlations between nutrient concentrations in stream water and benthic biofilms (abbreviations as in text).
| TN | NO3 − | NH4 + | TP | SRP | DOC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio-C | −0.465 | −0.486 | −0.224 | −0.153 | −0.049 | −0.375 |
| Bio-N | 0.854** | 0.712* | 0.211 | 0.651* | 0.625 | −0.383 |
| Bio-P | 0.582 | 0.345 | 0.168 | 0.856** | 0.790** | −0.722* |
Note: “*” indicates level of statistical significance at P < 0.05, “**” indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 2Relative abundance of microorganisms at the phylum level in stream biofilms. Only the phyla with a relative abundance >1% are shown. “Others” represent the unsigned OTUs and the phyla with a relative abundance <1%. Only the relative abundance of proteobacteria was significant between the upstream and downstream sites (“*” indicates level of statistical significance at P < 0.05).
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of the dissimilarities among microbial communities using the Bray-Curtis distances. (a) Bray-Curtis distances were calculated using the relative abundance of OTUs. (b) Bray-Curtis distances were calculated using the relative abundance of the functional genes predicted by PICRUSt.
Figure 4Redundancy analysis (RDA) reveals the association of microbial communities in relation to nutrient factors based on relative abundances of (a) OTUs and (b) functional genes. Abbreviations as in the text.
Figure 5Plots of Mantel tests showing the relationships between the functional gene and OTU dissimilarities. One dot represents one sample pair. Blue dots and line denote downstream sites. Red dots and line denote upstream sites.
Figure 6The co-occurrence network of bacterial communities in (a) upstream sites and (b) downstream sites. Edges represent correlation relationships. The gray solid line indicates positive associations and the cyan dashed line indicate negative associations. Only strong and significant relationships (Spearman R > 0.95 or R < −0.95, P < 0.01) are shown. Circle nodes represent the 1000 most abundant OTUs in upstream and downstream samples. The different colors of the nodes represent bacterial phyla.
Topological parameters of microbial networks in the upstream and downstream sites.
| Topological Parameter | Upstream | Downstream |
|---|---|---|
| Network Diameter | 20 | 19 |
| Network Centralization | 0.107 | 0.058 |
| Network Heterogeneity | 0.831 | 0.692 |
| Characteristic Path Length | 7.222 | 6.075 |
| Clustering Coefficient | 0.745 | 0.693 |
| Modularity | 0.693 | 0.779 |
Figure 7Nitrogen metabolic pathways (map00910) performed by KEGG mapper (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/mapper)[42]. The red box indicates the enzyme that had a significantly high relative abundance in upstream sites. The blue box indicates the enzyme that had a significant high relative abundance in downstream sites.
Figure 8Relative abundances of functional genes encoding the enzymes that catalyze nitrogen cycling pathways. Only the relative abundances of anammox and assimilatory nitrate reduction were significantly different between upstream and downstream (“*” indicates level of statistical significance at P < 0.05).
Relationships between the relative abundance of functional genes in benthic biofilms associated with nitrogen cycle pathways and nutrients in stream water and benthic biofilms (abbreviations as in text).
| TN | NO3 − | NH4 + | TP | SRP | DOC | Bio-C | Bio-N | Bio-P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anammox | 0.835** | 0.772** | 0.288 | 0.562 | 0.625 | 0.494 | 0.892** | 0.930** | 0.705* |
| Assimilatory Nitrate Reduction | −0.678* | −0.647* | 0.185 | −0.155 | −0.245 | −0.393 | −0.645* | −0.603 | −0.454 |
| Denitrification | 0.422 | 0.357 | 0.309 | 0.505 | 0.519 | 0.173 | 0.831** | 0.782** | 0.695* |
| Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction | 0.003 | 0.033 | −0.735* | −0.520 | −0.453 | −0.082 | −0.206 | −0.248 | −0.257 |
| Nitrification | 0.253 | 0.166 | 0.157 | 0.430 | 0.377 | 0.059 | 0.729* | 0.628 | 0.665* |
| Nitrogen Fixation | 0.295 | 0.198 | 0.048 | 0.302 | 0.086 | 0.409 | 0.630 | 0.544 | 0.416 |
Note: “*” indicates level of statistical significance at P < 0.05, “**” indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 9Carbon metabolism pathways (map01200) performed by KEGG mapper (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/mapper)[42]. The red line indicates the pathway that had significantly high relative abundance in upstream sites. The blue line indicates the pathway that had significantly high relative abundance in downstream sites.