| Literature DB >> 29118320 |
Golam Mezbah Uddin1, Neil A Youngson1, Bronte M Doyle1, David A Sinclair1,2, Margaret J Morris3.
Abstract
Maternal overnutrition increases the risk of long-term metabolic dysfunction in offspring. Exercise improves metabolism partly by upregulating mitochondrial biogenesis or function, via increased levels of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). We have shown that the NAD+ precursor, nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) can reverse some of the negative consequences of high fat diet (HFD) consumption. To investigate whether NMN can impact developmentally-set metabolic deficits, we compared treadmill exercise and NMN injection in offspring of obese mothers. Five week old lean and obese female C57BL6/J mice were mated with chow fed males. Female offspring weaned onto HFD were given treadmill exercise for 9 weeks, or NMN injection daily for 18 days. Maternal obesity programmed increased adiposity and liver triglycerides, with decreased glucose tolerance, liver NAD+ levels and citrate synthase activity in offspring. Both interventions reduced adiposity, and showed a modest improvement in glucose tolerance and improved markers of mitochondrial function. NMN appeared to have stronger effects on liver fat catabolism (Hadh) and synthesis (Fasn) than exercise. The interventions appeared to exert the most global benefit in mice that were most metabolically challenged (HFD-consuming offspring of obese mothers). This work encourages further study to confirm the suitability of NMN for use in reversing metabolic dysfunction linked to programming by maternal obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29118320 PMCID: PMC5678092 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14866-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Diet and intervention effects on body weight and GTT of female offspring. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 11–16 per group. The first letter represents the maternal diet and the second letter post-weaning diet; chow (C) or HFD (H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S), exercise (X) or NMN (N). Abbreviations: GTT, Glucose tolerance test; AUC, Area under curve. To explore the impact of maternal and post-weaning diet on body weight and GTT in the sedentary offspring groups CCS (open circle dotted line), CHS (closed circle dotted line), HCS (open circle solid line) and HHS (closed circle solid line) were analysed by three-way mixed ANOVA (A,D). To explore the impact of exercise or NMN on body weight over time, separate repeated one-way ANOVAs were performed in the offspring of obese mothers that consumed chow (B) or HFD (C). A separate two-way ANOVA was performed to analyse the AUC in these animals (E). To explore the impact of interventions (exercise and NMN) on GTT in the offspring consuming chow (F) and HFD (G), separate repeated one-way ANOVAs were performed. The significant effects are: † P < 0.05, †† P < 0.01, ††† P < 0.001 overall maternal HFD effect. ***P < 0.001 overall post-weaning diet effect. XP < 0.05, XXP < 0.01, XXXP < 0.001 simple main effect of exercise. ^P < 0.05, ^^^P < 0.001 simple main effect of NMN.
Body weight and organ mass in offspring of lean and obese mothers that consumed chow or HFD post-weaning
| Overall Effects | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCS | CHS | HCS | HHS | Maternal diet | Post Weaning Diet | Interaction | ||
| Final BW (g) | 18.1 ± 0.2 | 20.9 ± 0.1*** | 19.5 ± 0.3 | 28.04 ± 1.2†††/*** | F(1,52) = 62.33,P < 0.001 | F(1,52) = 110.37, P < 0.001 | F(1,52) = 27.24, P < 0.001 | |
| Liver (mg) | 765 ± 14 | 693 ± 13* | 779 ± 43 | 852 ± 27††† | F(1,48) = 11.9, P < 0.001 | ns | F(1,48) = 8.4, P < 0.01 | |
| Muscle (mg) | Quad | 236 ± 10 | 256 ± 11 | 247 ± 10 | 295 ± 8 | F(1,50) = 5.7, P < 0.05 | ns | |
| AT | 82 ± 4 | 88 ± 3 | 87 ± 3 | 98 ± 5 | F(1,52) = 4.2, P < 0.05 | F(1,52) = 4.9, p < 0.05 | ns | |
| Soleus | 12.4 ± 0.7 | 15.9 ± 0.7 | 15.1 ± 0.7 | 19.6 ± 0.6 | F(1,51) = 21.6, P < 0.001 | F(1,51) = 34.7, p < 0.001 | ns | |
| WAT (mg) | Gonadal | 141 ± 8 | 601 ± 89*** | 231 ± 22 | 1348 ± 164†††/*** | F(1,51) = 22.3, P < 0.001 | F(1,51) = 79.1, P < 0.001 | F(1,51) = 13.7, P < 0.001 |
| Inguinal | 165 ± 11 | 463 ± 57*** | 207 ± 13 | 823 ± 108†††/*** | F(1,49) = 12.4, P < 0.001 | F(1,49) = 63.7, P < 0.001 | F(1,49) = 7.7, P < 0.01 | |
| RP | 26.1 ± 2.3 | 143.0 ± 25.2*** | 44.5 ± 4.2 | 347.5 ± 33.5†††/*** | F(1,52) = 29.9, P < 0.001 | F(1,52) = 106.5, P < 0.001 | F(1,52) = 20.9, P < 0.001 | |
| Plasma Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.085 ± 0.020 | 0.154 ± 0.016*** | 0.166 ± 0.020 | 0.420 ± 0.0.038†††/*** | F(1,32) = 38.2, P < 0.001 | F(1,32) = 33.2, P < 0.001 | F(1,32) = 10.9, P < 0.01 | |
| Plasma Triglycerides (mg/mL) | 2.82 ± 0.24 | 3.21 ± 0.16** | 2.94 ± 0.11 | 3.62 ± 0.22** | ns | F(1,36) = 7.8, P < 0.01 | ns | |
Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 11–16 per group. The first letter indicates maternal HFD, chow (C) or HFD (H); second letter indicates post-weaning diet (C or H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S). To explore the impact of maternal and post-weaning diet on body weight and tissue phenotypes in the sedentary offspring groups CCS, CHS, HCS and HHS were analysed by two-way mixed ANOVA. Abbreviations: BW, body weight; WAT, white adipose tissue. Main effects are presented in the right hand panel. The significant effects are:
††† P < 0.001 overall maternal HFD effect.
* P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 overall post-weaning diet effect.
ns, no significant difference.
Body weight and organ mass in sedentary or exercised or NMN treated offspring of obese mothers that consumed chow or HFD post-weaning.
| CCS | CHS | HCS | HCX | HCN | HHS | HHX | HHN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final BW (g) | 18.1 ± 0.2 | 20.9 ± 0.1 | 19.5 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3X | 18.7 ± 0.2^ | 28.04 ± 1.2 | 24.3 ± 0.9XX | 24.8 ± 0.7^ |
| Liver (mg) | 765 ± 14 | 693 ± 13 | 779 ± 43 | 758 ± 23 | 811 ± 18 | 852 ± 27 | 779 ± 26 | 763 ± 22 |
| Muscle (mg) | ||||||||
| Quad | 236 ± 10 | 256 ± 11 | 247 ± 10 | 254 ± 12 | 272 ± 6 | 295 ± 8 | 303 ± 5 | 304 ± 7 |
| AT | 82 ± 4 | 88 ± 3 | 87 ± 3 | 86 ± 3.21 | 87 ± 3 | 98 ± 5 | 110 ± 4 | 100 ± 5 |
| Soleus | 12.4 ± 0.7 | 15.9 ± 0.7 | 15.1 ± 0.7 | 15.0 ± 0.5 | 16.3 ± 1.1 | 19.6 ± 0.6 | 20.2 ± 0.5 | 19.2 ± 0.7 |
| WAT (mg) | ||||||||
| Gonadal | 141 ± 8 | 601 ± 89 | 231 ± 22 | 231 ± 14 | 202 ± 15 | 1348 ± 16 | 946 ± 149X | 923 ± 92^ |
| Inguinal | 165 ± 11 | 463 ± 57 | 207 ± 13 | 232 ± 14 | 196 ± 5 | 823 ± 108 | 512 ± 66XXX | 532 ± 58^^ |
| RP | 26.1 ± 2.3 | 143.0 ± 25.2 | 44.5 ± 4.2 | 43.1 ± 2.4 | 40.5 ± 2.2 | 347.5 ± 33.5 | 252.0 ± 38.2XX | 220.5 ± 22.1^^^ |
| Plasma Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.085 ± 0.020 | 0.154 ± 0.016 | 0.166 ± 0.020 | 0.224 ± 0.037 | 0.317 ± 0.030^ | 0.420 ± 0.0.038 | 0.469 ± 0.033 | 0.588 ± 0.064^^ |
| Plasma Triglycerides (mg/mL) | 2.82 ± 0.24 | 3.21 ± 0.16 | 2.94 ± 0.11 | 3.38 ± 0.23 | 2.31 ± 0.41 | 3.62 ± 0.22 | 3.83 ± 0.24 | 3.14 ± 0.26 |
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Kill BW (g) | F(2,64) = 6.7, P < 0.01 | F(1,64) = 135.5, P < 0.001 | ns | |||||
| Liver (mg) | ns | ns | ns | |||||
| Muscle (mg) | Quad | ns | F(1,63) = 39.4, P < 0.001 | ns | ||||
| AT | ns | F(1,64) = 26.1, P < 0.001 | ns | |||||
| Soleus | ns | F(1,62) = 49.5, p < 0.001 | ns | |||||
| WAT (mg) | Gonadal | F(1,65) = 3.1, P < 0.05 | F(1,65) = 110.7, P < 0.001 | ns | ||||
| Inguinal | F(1,62) = 3.7, P < 0.05 | F(1,62) = 74.9, P < 0.001 | F(1,62) = 4.3, P < 0.05 | |||||
| RP | F(1,63) = 4.6, P < 0.05 | F(1,63) = 157.3, P < 0.001 | F(1,63) = 4.1, P < 0.05 | |||||
| Plasma Insulin (ng/mL) | F(1,49) = 7.2, P < 0.01 | F(1,49) = 54.7, P < 0.001 | ns | |||||
| Plasma Triglycerides (mg/mL) | F(1,50) = 5.9, P < 0.01 | F(1,50) = 9.6, P < 0.01 | ns | |||||
Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 11–12 per group. The first letter indicates maternal diet, chow (C) or HFD (H); second letter indicates post-weaning diet (C or H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S), exercise (X) or NMN (N). To explore the impact of post-weaning diet and intervention (exercise and NMN) on body weight and tissue phenotypes, the offspring groups HCS, HCX, HCN and HHS, HHX, HHN were analysed by a two-way mixed ANOVA presented upper section of the table. Offspring from lean mothers (CCS & CHS) are shown for comparison. Abbreviations: BW, body weight; WAT, white adipose tissue. Overall effects are presented in the bottom section of the table. The significant effects are:
XP < 0.05, XXP < 0.01, XXXP < 0.001 simple main effect of exercise.
^P < 0.05, ^^P < 0.01, ^^^P < 0.001 simple main effect of NMN.
Figure 2Effects of maternal diet, post-weaning diet, exercise and NMN on Hepatic NAD+ - NADH, citrate synthase activity and triglyceride content. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 5–12 per group. The first letter represents maternal and second letter represents post-weaning diet; chow (C) or HFD (H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S), exercise (X) or NMN (N). To investigate the effects of maternal and post-weaning diets on CCS, CHS, HCS and HHS groups on NAD+ (A), NADH (C), citrate synthase activity (E) and triglyceride (G) contents two-way ANOVAs were performed. To investigate the effects of post-weaning diet and intervention (exercise and NMN) on NAD+ (B), NADH (D) citrate synthase activity (F) and triglyceride (H) contents of the offspring from obese mothers consuming chow or HFD, HCS, HCX, HCN and HHS, HHX, HHN groups were compared by two-way ANOVA. The significant effects are: †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01 and †††P < 0.001 overall maternal HFD effect. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 overall post-weaning diet effect. #P < 0.05 and ###P < 0.001 overall intervention effect. XP < 0.05 simple main effect of exercise. ^P < 0.05, ^^P < 0.01 and ^^^P < 0.001 simple main effect of NMN.
mRNA expression of fat metabolism and gluconeogenesis markers in offspring of lean and obese mothers that consumed chow or HFD post-weaning.
| Gene | CCS | CHS | HCS | HHS | Maternal diet | Post weaning diet | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.28 ± 0.07** | 1.27 ± 0.09†† | 1.16 ± 0.08 | ns | ns | F (1, 34) = 7.522, p < 0.01 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.05 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.10 | ns | ns | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.08 | 1.48 ± 0.13 | 1.55 ± 0.16 | F (1,33) = 8.982, p < 0.01 | F(1,33) = 4.231, p < 0.05 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.13 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | ns | F(1,31) = 23.58, p < 0.001 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | ns | F(1,31) = 6.1, p < 0.05 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.45 ± 0.07 | 1.31 ± 0.08 | 1.53 ± 0.11 | F (1,33) = 5.435, p < 0.05 | F(1,31) = 16.285, p < 0.001 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.32 ± 0.18 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | 0.97 ± 0.07 | ns | F(1,33) = 6.051, p < 0.05 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.22 | 1.49 ± 0.23 | 1.00 ± 0.19 | 1.27 ± 0.26 | ns | F(1,31) = 4.710, p < 0.05 | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.14 | 1.09 ± 0.19 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | 0.99 ± 0.24 | ns | ns | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.56 ± 0.06** | 1.82 ± 0.24††† | 2.82 ± 0.48†††/*** | F (1, 30) = 20.9, p < 0.001 | F (1, 30) = 4.6, p < 0.05 | |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.04 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | ns | ns | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.10 ± 0.06 | 1.15 ± 0.07 | ns | ns | ns |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 1.12 ± 0.10 | 1.00 ± 0.07 | ns | ns | ns |
Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 9–10 per group. The first letter indicates maternal diet, chow (C) or HFD (H); second letter indicates post-weaning diet (C or H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S). To explore the impact of maternal and post-weaning diet on body weight and tissue phenotypes in the sedentary offspring groups CCS, CHS, HCS and HHS were analysed by two-way mixed ANOVA. Overall effects are presented in the right hand panel. Data are presented as fold changes compared to the CCS group. Abbreviations: Acc: Acetyl CoA Carboxylase; Cd36: Cluster of differentiation 36 / fatty acid translocase; Fasn: fatty acid synthase; Pparg: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; Mpc1: mitochondrial pyruvate career; Sirt1: silent mating type information regulation; PC: Pyruvate carboxylase; Pck1: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; G6pc: Glucose-6-phosphatase.
The significant effects are:
†† P < 0.01, ††† P < 0.001 overall maternal HFD effect.
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 overall post-weaning diet effect.
ns, no significant difference.
Figure 3Effect of NMN and exercise on expression of genes involved in fat transport, synthesis and β-oxidation in liver. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 9–10 per group. The first letter represents maternal and second letter represents post-weaning diet; chow (C) or HFD (H); the third letter represents intervention; sedentary (S), exercise (X) or NMN (N). Data are presented as fold changes compared to the CCS group. To investigate the effects of post-weaning diets and intervention (exercise and NMN) on mRNA expression of Cd36 (A), Fasn (B), Acc1 (C), Acc2 (D), Pparg (E), Mpc1 (F), Hadh (G) of the offspring of obese mothers consuming chow or HFD, HCS, HCX, HCN and HHS, HHX, HHN were compared by separate two-way ANOVAs. The significant effects are: ***P < 0.001 overall post-weaning diet effect. #P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 overall intervention effect. XP < 0.05 and XXXP < 0.001 simple main effect of exercise. ^P < 0.05; ^^P < 0.01 and ^^^P < 0.01 simple main effect of NMN.