| Literature DB >> 25853572 |
Mukesh Raipuria1, Hasnah Bahari2, Margaret J Morris1.
Abstract
Obesity during pregnancy contributes to the development of metabolic disorders in offspring. Maternal exercise may limit gestational weight gain and ameliorate these programming effects. We previously showed benefits of post-weaning voluntary exercise in offspring from obese dams. Here we examined whether voluntary exercise during pregnancy influences lipid and glucose homeostasis in muscle and fat in offspring of both lean and obese dams. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed chow (C) or high fat (F) diet for 6 weeks before mating. Half underwent voluntary exercise (CE/FE) with a running wheel introduced 10 days prior to mating and available until the dams delivered; others remained sedentary (CS/FS). Male and female pups were killed at postnatal day (PND)19 and retroperitoneal fat and gastrocnemius muscle were collected for gene expression. Lean and obese dams achieved similar modest levels of exercise. At PND1, both male and female pups from exercised lean dams were significantly lighter (CE versus CS), with no effect in those from obese dams. At PND19, maternal obesity significantly increased offspring body weight and adiposity, with no effect of maternal exercise. Exercise significantly reduced insulin concentrations in males (CE/FE versus CS/FS), with reduced glucose in male FE pups. In males, maternal obesity significantly decreased muscle myogenic differentiation 1 (MYOD1) and glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) mRNA expressions (FS vs CS); these were normalized by exercise. Maternal exercise upregulated adipose GLUT4, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC1α) mRNA expression in offspring of dams consuming chow. Modest voluntary exercise during pregnancy was associated with lower birth weight in pups from lean dams. Maternal exercise appeared to decrease the metabolic risk induced by maternal obesity, improving insulin/glucose metabolism, with greater effects in male than female offspring.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25853572 PMCID: PMC4390148 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Maternal body weight, fat and muscle mass, blood glucose, plasma insulin, triglyceride concentrations and maternal exercise level.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS (10) | CE (7) | FS (11) | FE (7) | |
| Body Weight (g) | 306.2 ± 8.4 | 301.4 ± 9.4 | 358.6 ± 10.5 | 358.2 ± 5.9 |
| Retroperitoneal WAT (g) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.34 | 3.5 ± 0.4 |
| Total WAT (g) | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 9.4 ± 0.9 |
| Total muscle (g) | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.02 |
| Blood glucose (mmol.l-1) | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.3 |
| Plasma insulin (ng.ml-1) | 0.45 ± 0.2 | 0.49 ± 0.2 | 0.79 ± 0.2 | 0.91 ± 0.3 |
| Plasma TG (mmol.l-1) | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 22.6 ± 4.3 | 14.2 ± 2.6 |
| Exercise level (km) | - | 8.1 ± 4.5 | - | 5.1 ± 1.5 |
Body weight, retroperitoneal WAT, total WAT, muscle mass, blood glucose, plasma insulin and triglyceride concentrations of lean and obese dams at 4 weeks post-partum. Total fat represents the sum of retroperitoneal, gonadal and visceral fat pads. Muscle mass represents the sum of gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity; sedentary (S) or exercise (E). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc LSD comparison.
**P < .01, maternal HFD effect.
Fig 1Maternal blood glucose concentration during the lactation period, at postpartum day 12.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity; sedentary (S) or exercise (E). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc LSD. **P< .01 maternal HFD effect; †† P < .01 maternal exercise effect.
Fig 2Body weight of male and female pups at postnatal day 1.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity; sedentary (S) or exercise (E). Data in male and female offspring were analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA with maternal diet and maternal activity as factors, followed by post hoc LSD. **P < .01 maternal HFD effect; ††P < .01 maternal exercise effect.
Offspring body weight, visceral fat, total fat, muscle mass, blood glucose, plasma insulin and triglyceride concentrations at PND19.
| Male | Female | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS (17) | CE (14) | FS (16) | FE (12) | CS (18) | CE (13) | FS (21) | FE (12) | |
| Body weight (g) | 33.4 ± 1.0 | 30.0 ± 0.6 | 49.7 ± 2.7 | 49.8 ± 2.6 | 31.5 ± 0.9 | 28.9 ± 0.5 | 47.3 ± 1.4 | 46.8 ± 1.4 |
| Visceral fat (mg) | 125.4 ± 5.3 | 107.5 ± 3.9 | 229.0 ± 17.3 | 250.0 ± 13.1 | 106.7 ± 6.3 | 90.3 ± 7.1 | 234.6 ± 10.8 | 213.5 ± 13.7 |
| Total WAT (mg) | 283.6 ± 24.8 | 223.1 ± 19.5 | 675.6 ± 66.9 | 713.9 ± 41.6 | 143.5 ± 8.8 | 122.3 ± 7.8 | 385.8 ± 2.4 | 387.0 ± 22.9 |
| Total muscle (mg) | 161.9 ± 7.6 | 137.3 ± 4.4 | 221.8 ± 19.6 | 236.3 ± 23.9 | 149.0 ± 7.0 | 141.8 ± 10.4 | 197.7 ± 14.4 | 209.7 ± 15.9 |
| Blood glucose (mmol.l-1) | 7.6 ± 0.3 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 7.6 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 |
| Plasma insulin (ng.ml-1) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 |
| Plasma TG (mmol.l-1) | 26.6 ± 2.7 | 20.8 ± 2.6 | 27.1 ± 3.4 | 32.7 ± 4.7 | 16.1 ± 1.2 | 15.0 ± 2.9 | 22.6 ± 2.3 | 21.9 ± 1.9 |
Body weight, visceral fat, total WAT, muscle mass, blood glucose, plasma insulin and triglyceride concentrations in male and female offspring at PND19.
Total fat represents the sum of retroperitoneal, gonadal and visceral fat pads. Muscle mass represents the sum of gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity. Data in male and female offspring were analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA with maternal diet and maternal activity as factors, followed by post hoc LSD.
*P < .05;
**P < .01 maternal HFD effect;
†P < .05 maternal exercise effect
Relative gene expression in gastrocnemius muscle of offspring at PND19.
| Male | Female | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS (17) | CE (14) | FS (16) | FE (12) | CS (18) | CE (13) | FS (21) | FE (12) | |
| GLUT4 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 1.04 ± 0.09 | 1.16 ± 0.13 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.97 ± 0.07 |
| MYOD1 | 1.05 ± 0.12 | 0.77 ± 0.17 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.84 ± 0.16 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 1.21 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.06 |
| SIRT3 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 1.06 ± 0.11 | 0.96 ± 0.10 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 1.06 ± 0.11 |
| IL6 | 1.23 ± 0.20 | 0.96 ± 0.21 | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.85 ± 0.18 | 1.06 ± 0.12 | 1.40 ± 0.13 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | 0.86 ± 0.05 |
| PGC1α | 1.12 ± 0.12 | 1.52 ± 0.10 | 1.09± 0.07 | 1.23 ± 0.11 | 1.09 ± 0.10 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 1.11 ± 0.06 |
| UCP3 | 1.01 ± 0.12 | 1.22 ± 0.20 | 1.11 ± 0.10 | 1.31 ± 0.15 | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 1.15 ± 0.09 | 1.23 ± 0.10 |
| TNFα | 1.20 ± 0.11 | 1.26 ± 0.15 | 1.67 ± 0.15 | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.16 | 1.47 ± 0.15 | 1.23 ± 0.10 | 1.30 ± 0.11 |
| GLUT4 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 1.21 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.06 |
Relative gene expression in gastrocnemius muscle in male and female offspring at PND19. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity. Data in male and female offspring were analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA with maternal diet and maternal activity as factors, followed by post hoc LSD.
*P < .05;
**P < .01 maternal HFD effect;
†P < .05 maternal exercise effect.
Fig 3Relative gene expression in RpWAT of male and female offspring at PND19.
Male: GLUT4 (A), PGC1α (C) and TNF-α (E), Female: GLUT4 (B), PGC1α (D) and TNF-α (F), gene expression. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The first letter describes maternal diet; chow (C) or HFD (F) and the second letter describes maternal activity; sedentary (S) or exercise (E). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with maternal diet and maternal activity as factors, followed by post hoc LSD comparison. *P < .05; **P < .01 maternal diet effect; †P < .05; ††P < .01 maternal exercise effect.