Literature DB >> 29118130

What have humans done for evolutionary biology? Contributions from genes to populations.

Michael Briga1, Robert M Griffin1, Vérane Berger1, Jenni E Pettay1, Virpi Lummaa2.   

Abstract

Many fundamental concepts in evolutionary biology were discovered using non-human study systems. Humans are poorly suited to key study designs used to advance this field, and are subject to cultural, technological, and medical influences often considered to restrict the pertinence of human studies to other species and general contexts. Whether studies using current and recent human populations provide insights that have broader biological relevance in evolutionary biology is, therefore, frequently questioned. We first surveyed researchers in evolutionary biology and related fields on their opinions regarding whether studies on contemporary humans can advance evolutionary biology. Almost all 442 participants agreed that humans still evolve, but fewer agreed that this occurs through natural selection. Most agreed that human studies made valuable contributions to evolutionary biology, although those less exposed to human studies expressed more negative views. With a series of examples, we discuss strengths and limitations of evolutionary studies on contemporary humans. These show that human studies provide fundamental insights into evolutionary processes, improve understanding of the biology of many other species, and will make valuable contributions to evolutionary biology in the future.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  demography; ecology; menopause; phenotypic plasticity; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29118130      PMCID: PMC5698635          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  76 in total

1.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep.

Authors:  T Coulson; E A Catchpole; S D Albon; B J Morgan; J M Pemberton; T H Clutton-Brock; M J Crawley; B T Grenfell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  General theory of mortality and aging.

Authors:  B L STREHLER; A S MILDVAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Max Wolf; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Why evolutionary biologists should be demographers.

Authors:  C Jessica E Metcalf; Samuel Pavard
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals.

Authors:  T Uller; S Nakagawa; S English
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Separate and combined effects of nutrition during juvenile and sexual development on female life-history trajectories: the thrifty phenotype in a cockroach.

Authors:  Emma L B Barrett; John Hunt; Allen J Moore; Patricia J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Culture in whales and dolphins.

Authors:  L Rendell; H Whitehead
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  The dynamics of a quantitative trait in an age-structured population living in a variable environment.

Authors:  Tim Coulson; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women.

Authors:  Mirkka Lahdenperä; Virpi Lummaa; Samuli Helle; Marc Tremblay; Andrew F Russell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Humans as a model for understanding biological fundamentals.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Erik Postma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Humans as model organisms.

Authors:  Kim Sterelny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  What have humans done for evolutionary biology? Contributions from genes to populations.

Authors:  Michael Briga; Robert M Griffin; Vérane Berger; Jenni E Pettay; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.