Literature DB >> 29113973

Maximising the impact of your work using infographics.

I R Murray1, A D Murray2, S J Wordie1, C W Oliver1, A W Murray3, A H R W Simpson4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113973      PMCID: PMC5717072          DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint Res        ISSN: 2046-3758            Impact factor:   5.853


× No keyword cloud information.
‘Science advances only if knowledge is shared’ (Warnick[1]) Medical science is a cumulative process. Its progress and benefits to society rely on scientists and clinicians building on each other’s work. Scientists and clinicians unaware of practice changing literature cannot change their practice. As a science community, we spend long hours ensuring the highest standards in our research, but frequently fall short in efforts to ensure the resulting data is presented in an engaging fashion, and is shared widely. Presenting information with graphics enhances understanding.[2] This is not a new concept. Florence Nightingale’s graphical representation of causes of mortality amongst British forces in the Crimean war illustrated forcefully that death from preventable disease outnumbered other causes including battle wounds. Our ability to process and recall information is superior if learnt with visual inputs.[3] Visual instructions for building flat-pack furniture is more effective than text-based instructions,[4] and a text only powerpoint is of limited appeal to most. Information graphics or infographics utilise images and data visualisations (pie charts, bar graphs, line graphs) to present research in an engaging way. Infographics add value by increasing understanding and the reach of research. Information is more likely to be retained if it was learnt from an infographic than from text alone.[5] Articles associated with a visual abstract are three times more likely to be viewed than articles published with text-only abstracts and significantly increase alternative metrics or ‘altmetrics’.[6,7] It is well worth investing the time to get an infographic right. Researchers should take ownership of the content and design of their infographic. However, there are an increasing number of software packages that can help in the production of infographics, most requiring only limited computing ability. Online libraries of graphics and illustrations are also available through websites such as Shutterstock and Pixabay. For specialist support, there is a well-established industry in the production of infographics, many of whom have particular expertise in scientific research communication. Here we discuss some principles of infographic design and make some suggestions for creating engaging infographics:

(i) Target your audience

It is important to be clear for whom the infographic is intended to reach. Visuals that are created for a scientific, but non-specialist, audience can make the research more accessible to a broader audience. Providing context and removing technical jargon, will ensure that your work is accessible to the widest possible audience.

(ii) Use a compelling title to attract readers

Consider the “breaking news headline” of your research. This is often the most impactful finding of the study, and is frequently shorter than the full article headline.

(iii) Provide a narrative

Effective infographics frequently use lines and arrows to guide readers through the information on a graphic. Having a clear start and end ensures that the readers process the information in the order you intend and make sure that no information is missing. Consider “nodes” of information that may relate to specific experiments or chapters in the research story. The ‘no text test’ can be used to establish whether the key messages are conveyed when the text is removed.[8]

(iv) Emphasise key messages

Key messages can be prioritised by increasing the size of the relevant component as well as increasing text size and using striking colours. Like traditional abstracts, infographics are used to provide an overview of research, but are not intended to be a substitute for reading a full research paper.

(v) Balance images, charts and text

It is important to balance data visualisations, images and words. Try to limit text to striking titles, brief annotations and bullet points. In general, text-light, image-dense infographics are most successful.[9]

(vi) Limit the number of colours and fonts

Use three to five complementary colours and limit the number of font types to a maximum of three.[8,10] The success of any infographic depends on a well-thought-out dissemination plan. Social media is now a much used and helpful tool for the dissemination of new research and the visual appeal of infographics are particularly suited to these platforms. Infographics are shared eight times more on social media compared with text-only summaries,[7] and research articles accompanied by an infographic are accessed more frequently than those without. We urge authors and readers to start using infographics.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Research on Social Media: A Prospective, Case-control Crossover Study.

Authors:  Andrew M Ibrahim; Keith D Lillemoe; Mary E Klingensmith; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  How to make an engaging infographic?

Authors:  Hilary Scott; Samantha Fawkner; Christopher W Oliver; Andrew Murray
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Why healthcare professionals should know a little about infographics.

Authors:  Hilary Scott; Samantha Fawkner; Chris Oliver; Andrew Murray
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  The impact of social media promotion with infographics and podcasts on research dissemination and readership.

Authors:  Brent Thoma; Heather Murray; Simon York Ming Huang; William Ken Milne; Lynsey J Martin; Christopher M Bond; Rohit Mohindra; Alvin Chin; Calvin H Yeh; William B Sanderson; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 5.  Visualizing uncertainty about the future.

Authors:  David Spiegelhalter; Mike Pearson; Ian Short
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating a high-quality infographic.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; Andrew M Ibrahim; Lynsey J Martin; Yusuf Yilmaz; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Audit changes practice-a simple education intervention can lead to better outcome in ankle fracture surgery.

Authors:  Amin Kheiran; Veronica Roberts; Balvinder Rana; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-08

3.  eB4CAST Approach Improves Science Communication With Stakeholders in a College-Based Health Program.

Authors:  Melissa D Olfert; Makenzie L Barr; Rebecca L Hagedorn; Rachel A Wattick; Wenjun Zhou; Tanya M Horacek; Anne E Mathews; Kendra K Kattelmann; Tandalayo Kidd; Adrienne A White; Onikia N Brown; Jesse Stabile Morrell; Lisa Franzen-Castle; Karla P Shelnutt; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Terezie Tolar-Peterson; Geoffrey W Greene; Sarah E Colby
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-07

4.  Improving mesothelioma follow-up care in the UK: a qualitative study to build a multidisciplinary pyramid of care approach.

Authors:  Zoe Davey; Catherine Henshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Reporting characteristics of journal infographics: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Giovanni E Ferreira; Mark R Elkins; Caitlin Jones; Mary O'Keeffe; Aidan G Cashin; Rosa E Becerra; Andrew R Gamble; Joshua R Zadro
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Identifying and adapting interventions to reduce documentation burden and improve nurses' efficiency in using electronic health record systems (The IDEA Study): protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Gillian Strudwick; Lianne Jeffs; Jessica Kemp; Lydia Sequeira; Brian Lo; Nelson Shen; Petroiya Paterson; Noelle Coombe; Lily Yang; Kara Ronald; Wei Wang; Sonia Pagliaroli; Tania Tajirian; Sara Ling; Damian Jankowicz
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-08-04

7.  How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Joshua R Zadro; Giovanni E Ferreira; Mary O'Keeffe; Will Stahl-Timmins; Mark R Elkins; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.263

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.