Literature DB >> 29113956

Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system.

Rachel L Winer1, Jasmin A Tiro2, Diana L Miglioretti3, Chris Thayer4, Tara Beatty5, John Lin6, Hongyuan Gao7, Kilian Kimbel8, Diana S M Buist9.   

Abstract

Women who delay or do not attend Papanicolaou (Pap) screening are at increased risk for cervical cancer. Trials in countries with organized screening programs have demonstrated that mailing high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kits to under-screened women increases participation, but U.S. data are lacking. HOME is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial set within a U.S. integrated healthcare delivery system to compare two programmatic approaches for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in under-screened women (>3.4years since last Pap) aged 30-64years: 1) usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach by clinics) and 2) usual care plus mailed hrHPV self-screening kits. Over 2.5years, eligible women were identified through electronic medical record (EMR) data and randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control arm. Women in the intervention arm were mailed kits with pre-paid envelopes to return samples to the central clinical laboratory for hrHPV testing. Results were documented in the EMR to notify women's primary care providers of appropriate follow-up. Primary outcomes are detection and treatment of cervical neoplasia. Secondary outcomes are cervical cancer screening uptake, abnormal screening results, and women's experiences and attitudes towards hrHPV self-sampling and follow-up of hrHPV-positive results (measured through surveys and interviews). The trial was designed to evaluate whether a programmatic strategy incorporating hrHPV self-sampling is effective in promoting adherence to the complete screening process (including follow-up of abnormal screening results and treatment). The objective of this report is to describe the rationale and design of this pragmatic trial.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Human papillomavirus; Pragmatic clinical trial; Screening; Self-sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113956      PMCID: PMC5742021          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  53 in total

1.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia.

Authors:  Farhana Sultana; Dallas R English; Julie A Simpson; Kelly T Drennan; Robyn Mullins; Julia M L Brotherton; C David Wrede; Stella Heley; Marion Saville; Dorota M Gertig
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Experience with high-risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush-based self-samples of non-attendees of the cervical screening program.

Authors:  Murat Gök; Folkert J van Kemenade; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Johannes Berkhof; Lawrence Rozendaal; Johan W M Spruyt; Jeroen A M Beliën; Milena Babovic; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; C Y Wang; Kathryn Horner; Sheryl Catz; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon; David Carrell; Jessica Chubak; Cynthia Ko; Sharon Laing; Andy Bogart
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Absolute risk of a subsequent abnormal pap among oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA-positive, cytologically negative women.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Sholom Wacholder; Mark E Sherman; Attila T Lorincz; Andrew G Glass; David R Scott; Brenda B Rush; Franklin Demuth; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.

Authors:  Wendy A Leyden; M Michele Manos; Ann M Geiger; Sheila Weinmann; Judy Mouchawar; Kimberly Bischoff; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Joyce Gilbert; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Implementation of systems strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening services in health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  Karin Valentine Goins; Jane G Zapka; Ann M Geiger; Leif I Solberg; Stephen Taplin; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Joyce Gilbert; Judy Mouchawar; Carol P Somkin; Sheila Weinmann
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Short-time repeat high-risk HPV testing by self-sampling for screening of cervical cancer.

Authors:  U Gyllensten; K Sanner; I Gustavsson; M Lindell; I Wikström; E Wilander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Five-year experience of human papillomavirus DNA and Papanicolaou test cotesting.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Ruth Shaber; Walter Kinney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White; Trevor D Thompson; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Wendy E Barrington; Amy DeGroff; Stephanie Melillo; Thuy Vu; Allison Cole; Cam Escoffery; Natoshia Askelson; Laura Seegmiller; Sarah Koopman Gonzalez; Peggy Hannon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Reactions of women underscreened for cervical cancer who received unsolicited human papillomavirus self-sampling kits.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana Sm Buist; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Kilian Kimbel; Hongyuan Gao; Chris Thayer; Diana L Miglioretti; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?

Authors:  Hitomi Kariya; Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Linda K Ko; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs.

Authors:  Sarah Gupta; Christina Palmer; Elisabeth M Bik; Juan P Cardenas; Harold Nuñez; Laurens Kraal; Sara W Bird; Jennie Bowers; Alison Smith; Nathaniel A Walton; Audrey D Goddard; Daniel E Almonacid; Susan Zneimer; Jessica Richman; Zachary S Apte
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-09

5.  Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rachel L Winer; John Lin; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana L Miglioretti; Tara Beatty; Hongyuan Gao; Kilian Kimbel; Chris Thayer; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01

6.  Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Mailed self-sample HPV testing kits to improve cervical cancer screening in a safety net health system: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Matthew L Anderson; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Scott B Cantor; Susan L Parker; Maria Daheri; Shaun Bulsara; Betsy Escobar; Ashish A Deshmukh; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Mohammed Zare; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.